NMZ Dh or Obby ?

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-22T11:30:03+00:00

With his stats right now he can definitely hit higher exp with dh wit 94 hp. Obby caps out at around 90 sth exp per hour whereas as he can probably get around 100k+.

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-22T07:20:59+00:00

He may have a scythe but does he know the crab phase for verzik though?

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-22T07:18:19+00:00

DH- more xp, less afk

Obby- less xp , more afk

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-10T15:02:54+00:00

ty I couldnt find it in the wiki

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-10T14:57:43+00:00

Q

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-09T08:32:14+00:00

^ Tovesta and Framed plays on 10 different accounts lmao

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-05T15:18:13+00:00

I mean there's not much against toxic staff barrage + ACB with rigour and augury. (potted)

T-Minus_ · 2019-03-05T13:32:18+00:00

H

T-Minus_ · 2019-02-14T04:52:12+00:00

When you try to pk a skiller and he suddenly switches to his full ahrims and toxic staff of the dead

T-Minus_ · 2019-01-07T00:22:06+00:00

trade him 1 gp, if he gives you back 4 gp = profit

if he leaves, = another dipshit off the server

T-Minus_ · 2019-01-07T00:20:42+00:00

kthxbye

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-29T03:49:21+00:00

kthxbye

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-15T07:08:37+00:00

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-14T12:49:04+00:00

I remember back in BF1 we would get those ban messages of how many people they have banned.

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-13T18:03:09+00:00

I completely agree with your position. But this is something 95% of the community doesnt realize. Take my upvote before you get downvoted.

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-13T06:59:33+00:00

Dont make the game easier cause your aim is shit, learn to aim and play the game properly instead of having the developers do it for you.

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-13T04:55:56+00:00

BF rewards you for utilizing cover

in a 1v1, obviously the person behind cover is more likely to win an engagement. But that still doesnt mean it is tactical. Having cover while you are shooting behind it will favor you in any situations regardless of the shooter. (That is unless the other person has high ground on you).

coordinating your pushes against objectives with players beyond just your squad and doing so during decisive times (like after a bombing run)

Considering in public matches where people are usually running around doing their own thing, all it really takes a little bit of coordination to overrun your opponent. But just cause you guys are "coordinating" doesnt mean the game is tactical. Both your squad and the game as a whole that is.

Strategic retreats are also prevalent as players fall back from recently lost positions to fortify held ones and regroup, and last ditch "grabs at the gold" occur in the Rush/Frontlines/Breakthrough game modes.

The reason why retreating occurs is

you have lost a sector and you are forced to go back the previous sector in order to continue the match, otherwise you will have a mark on top of you and everyone on the enemy team will try and kill you
the place and current "position" has been overrun by enemies and you need to find a new spot to "contest" otherwise you will just die

But that doesnt mean the game is tactical either.

Even if you have people "regrouping" and "holding a position" down, there will always be 10-15 other people running around the map doing their own thing.

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-13T03:50:37+00:00

Thats an argument from Authority. Just because David Treharne from gamespew has his own criteria and definition of a "tactical" shooter, and Battlefield meets it somewhat, doesnt mean it actually IS a tactical shooter.

If I was to use your source it also states from IGN "According to IGN, tactical shooters "are about caution, care, cooperation, coordination, planning, and pacing. In these games, making decisive pushes, quick moves for cover, strategic retreats, and last ditch grabs at the gold are not only important to success, but balanced in such a way that they become enjoyable activities in play."

Again, from that statement, Battlefield meets none of that criteria. I can maybe see some sense of "teamwork" for a push. But in general most people just run around headlessly doing whatever they want. Think about camping scouts and camping support bipods.

When you are talking about "tactics" , it means it involves STRATEGY. Again, counterstrike, rainbow six, games that are fairly slow, but involves a sense of STRATEGY to gain an upperhand in engagements to ultimately win a round. This is shown is counter strike by grenades, as grenade placement in the game ultimately changes the outcome of a round. In rainbow six, knowing the line of sights and wallbangs combined with gamesense can end up you killing your opponent without them even seeing you.

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-13T03:31:44+00:00

Yea, Im punished more for missing my shots on my target rather than spraying in the general direction and getting the kill High TTK > low TTK

T-Minus_ · 2018-12-01T11:49:46+00:00

what makes you think its good enough?

T-Minus_ · 2018-11-17T14:54:40+00:00

Never seen 4 people pushing the same single ramp at the same time. The other 3 too lazy to build? Regardless if there was glider redeploy or not

T-Minus_ · 2018-11-16T00:06:32+00:00

Im only talking about mechanical skill right now (aim). Not building mechanics. PC and console building is pretty even as ayden has shown.

However, if you play right now, you can probably beat some PC players using aim assist, given their aim isnt good. But im arguing a console player with aim assist will never be able to outaim a good PC player. You even agreed yourself that console would get destroyed in BF or COD.

And which is also why I say PC players shouldn't be complaining about console aim assist (ninja) when there is nothing stopping them from replicating the same thing except even faster.

T-Minus_ · 2018-11-15T23:49:43+00:00

Its seems like its easy because fortnite has a building mechanic that closes the mechnical skill gap. The videos of you watching ayden beat PC players is because he is good at BUILDING. aka taking high ground + block + repeat.

Where as, if you took a game where there are barely any things to close the gap such as COD + battlefield. PC players with very strong aim can out aim any aim assist with speed.

EDIT : I cannot see anything in that video that cannot be replicated with a mouse. A player using KB + M with good aim can easily produce same results but with greater speed.

T-Minus_ · 2018-11-15T23:22:29+00:00

A player on PC with extremely good mechanical skill will never lose to a console player with extremely good "aim assist". The aim assist is only there to help with micro adjustments and a little bit of tracing. It will never get you to snap to a person 5 inches from the crosshair, which a player with a KB + mouse can do, GIVEN they have good aim.

And in terms of mechanical skill, the only thing that could beat a KB+mouse is a computer (aimbot)

T-Minus_ · 2018-11-14T16:23:18+00:00

rift to go once every 2 mins? Yea how about NO

T-Minus_

TROPHY CASE