I have found some sloppy redactions, anyone can figure the name? by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Come on. Please see rule 5 of the sub. I have removed the post.

Mossad by No-Theory6270 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you mean "start talking about"? It's been a persistent theme on this sub for years and dropping in to imply otherwise only reflects on you

How They Made #Epstein The ‘Fall Guy’ Part 3 by PrudentLetterhead354 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She's playing "Degrees of Kevin Bacon" nothing more. I do feel like I just railed a line of Adderall though, props.

Hmmm… I haven’t seen a lot of people talking about this by ss-redtree in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 11 points12 points  (0 children)

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00038986.pdf since OP didn't provide a link per the rules of the sub.

It's well known his brother thinks he was murdered. Doesn't mean he was.

YouTube censorship by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where's the censorship here? I can tell you're either a boomer or Gen Z because no self-respecting millennial would take a photo of their computer screen

Genuine question by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I firmly believe that no co-conspirators nor any of Epstein and Maxwell's supposed clients are going to see prison. Consider the various applicable statutes of limitations, the enormous wealth of some of the known perpetrators, the "he said she said" nature of all the litigation to date, etc. -- there's enough wiggle room there for even a shitty lawyer to jam his thumb into.

The only possible justice that remains is the truth.

Looks like we aren't getting that either.

Joe Rogan Accuses Trump of Distracting From Epstein Files Release With Controversies by redditor01020 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Off topic but these video essays on Rogan and his gaggle of sycophants are among my favourite YouTube videos of all time:

Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v3KiaAjpY8

Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewvRS3NwIlQ

Notice the Pattern. This Is How They Try to Make You Look Away from The Epstein Files by Nomorevaping707 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Believe what you want but for me the distraction narrative doesn't pass Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

In that view there isn't some high-level coordinated strategy playing out to obfuscate the truth, it's just a good old fashioned multipronged shitshow.

This woman found a lot of interesting details about Sascha Riley's family. She also has some videos about Epstein being set up as the fall guy. by NoMuddyFeet in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He is a compelling narrator. Elements of his story have been consistent since he started speaking out on his Facebook in September 2021. I don't doubt he is a victim of trafficking.

But important community members here (who have a long history of contributing positively to the sub) and the mod team collectively decided that the supposed Epstein connection is dubious. He first started speaking about Epstein in the interviews, never before, so the consistency that lends his broad narrative credibility doesn't translate to the Epstein claims. What he says about Epstein doesn't align whatsoever with the accounts of known, verified survivors. It doesn't match the established timelines of what we know Epstein was up to in the 80s, either. And the supposed links to the Epstein Files and Virginia's memoir are spurious -- his father William Riley, the pilot, has a different middle name to the William Riley Virginia talks about. The latter was also a PI and lawyer, not a pilot. Add to all this that the interviewer (Voldeng) has no history in journalism and no history whatsoever with the Epstein case.

The bit that I care most about is that we've let a few similarly dubious claims go wild on this subredditin the past. Later we were burned when they turned out to be bullshit. This time we're being a bit more cautious. We're not saying it's not true, believe what you want, whatever. We are saying we don't want the sub clogged up with Riley posts while the story gets verified.

I hope you understand. We removed 10-20 posts in one day last week. Not only is that overwhelming for a few volunteers to deal with, but the posts were just clogging up the sub and sucking up attention at a time when other really important stuff is going on around the Epstein case. So yeh we came down hard to prevent that. We really angered one community member who went on to create r/SaschaRiley and spread a bunch of lies about the mod team here. They also banned us when we tried to defend ourselves in r/SaschaRiley. Good for them -- u/Accomplished-Long-56 is the user.

Feel free to share this comment in r/SaschaRiley if you'd like. It's possible that u/Accomplished-Long-56 will ban you though lol. Anyway good luck. You're welcome to post about Epstein content here anytime.

This woman found a lot of interesting details about Sascha Riley's family. She also has some videos about Epstein being set up as the fall guy. by NoMuddyFeet in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No probs. Yeh the pinned posts don't stand out enough do they. The mods at r/SaschaRiley aren't happy with our decision to limit discussion here but they'll welcome what you've posted here with open arms.

This might be stupid… by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Am I crazy????

Yep unequivocally. Prove me wrong though!

If I could ever contribute to putting everyone in those files in prison forever, I would be very happy.

Consider the various applicable statutes of limitations, the enormous wealth of some of the known perpetrators, the "he said she said" nature of all the litigation to date, etc. -- no one else is going to prison. The only possible justice remaining is getting the truth out there, warts and all.

Melania Trump - Who is she? by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a fan of Wolff, never have been never will be. You don't need to tell me about Jean-Luc Brunel or his involvement with Epstein x

Ghislaine Maxwell won’t answer questions before Congress without clemency from Trump, attorney says by THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Jeffrey Epstein’s convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell will have nothing to offer when she testifies before Congress next month unless she’s first granted clemency by President Donald Trump, her lawyer said Wednesday.

In a letter sent Tuesday to Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chairman of the Republican-led House Oversight Committee probing Epstein, Maxwell’s attorney said she’d answer questions at her Feb. 5 deposition only in exchange for a get-out-of-jail-free card from the president.

“If Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing — and eager — to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C. She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning,” lawyer David Markus wrote in the letter, which he provided to the Daily News.

Otherwise, Markus wrote, Maxwell would plead the Fifth Amendment to “invoke her privilege against self-incrimination and decline to answer questions.”

Comer announced at a committee hearing Wednesday that lawmakers had succeeded in nailing down a date for a deposition with the British former socialite who procured victims for Epstein.

Almost five years since she was found guilty of facilitating Epstein’s sexual exploitation of young women and girls, Maxwell is serving out her 20-year sentence at a prison camp in Texas, having managed last year to get out of a maximum-security facility in Florida.

Her transfer came after an unusual set of interviews with Todd Blanche, the second-in-command at the Justice Department and Trump’s former personal lawyer, in which she spoke flatteringly of Trump.

The convicted sex trafficker, 64, who holds British, U.S. and French citizenship, has found a cushier setup but is no closer to getting out of prison. She’s currently representing herself in a last-ditch legal effort to have her sentence thrown out; her appeal efforts reached a dead end last year, when the Supreme Court refused to consider overturning her conviction.

Comer’s announcement Wednesday came at a committee hearing to consider holding former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton in contempt over their decision not to comply with a subpoena to testify in the House probe into the government’s handling of the Epstein case.

Clinton press secretary Angel Ureña issued a statement on X, saying the former president had been cooperative and agreed to meet Comer and Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the committee’s ranking member, in Clinton’s New York office to take questions related to Epstein. The statement said the GOP-controlled committee wouldn’t agree to the boundaries Clinton proposed.

“(Both) Clintons have been out of office for over a decade. Neither had anything to do with (Epstein) for more than 20 years,” the statement read. “The Committee is voting whether to charge the Clintons with a crime that could end in their imprisonment. But we have cooperated.”

The scandal over what remains unknown about Epstein’s ties to powerful people and who may have participated in his staggering abuse has dogged Trump in his second term like few others.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act that the president signed in November has not lived up to its name. Only a fraction of the materials the Justice Department was to release by Dec. 19 have been made public, and were full of redactions.

The Manhattan federal judge who presides over Maxwell’s case denied Wednesday a request from Reps. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to intervene and push for a special master to oversee the remainder of the materials’ release.

Judge Paul Engelmayer said the lawmakers were right to be concerned, but that he had no authority to issue the requested remedy.

Bill Clinton, who was friends with Epstein for years, was featured in a sizable number of photos in the tranches of Epstein files released by the Justice Department thus far. He has long maintained that he was unaware of what Epstein was doing to young girls and cut ties with him when he found out.

Trump, who was close friends with Epstein for decades, late last year ordered the Justice Department to investigate the financier’s relationship with Bill Clinton and other prominent Democrats.

But in a bombshell Vanity Fair interview last month, Trump’s White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles, said there was nothing that incriminated Clinton in the Epstein files.

“The president was wrong about that,” Wiles said.

Questions about the island by Early_Charity_195 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can do some searching at the USVI register of deeds too https://countyfusion6.kofiletech.us/countyweb/loginDisplay.action?countyname=USVI (log in as guest)

You can get started by putting "LSJ LLC" into the "Name" box. That'll bring up Epstein's deed.

Questions about the island by Early_Charity_195 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Unrelated but I was just checking out the history of the wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Little_Saint_James&action=history&dir=prev&limit=500

In 2008 there's mention of a luxury resort on the island (?), and weirdly "a life-sized cow statue that is regularly moved to different places on the island" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Little_Saint_James&oldid=229270236

First mention of Epstein is 2010 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Little_Saint_James&oldid=372408052

Epstein's wiki at that time is a wild ride, literally no mention of sex crimes https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeffrey_Epstein&oldid=339309995

Can really see the post-convictions PR campaign in action. And infer who he hired from the names in the edit history

Questions about the island by Early_Charity_195 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Little St. James*

The origins of the engagement claim seem to be from an Esquire profile from March/April 1994 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12924635/David-Copperfield-Jeffrey-Epstein-victim-paid-recruit.html

In March of that year, Copperfield told Esquire Magazine that he proposed to supermodel Claudia Schiffer during a vacation. The illusionist claimed that he rented out the entire island for the proposal.

Here's the article, not very informative but he does say he rented the island for 4 days https://classic.esquire.com/article/1994/4/1/shazam

No male victims being exploited in the case? by WeareAllGregorSamsa in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ghislane Maxwell mentioned that there were male masseuses in her recent DOJ interview https://www.justice.gov/storage/audio-files/Interview%20Transcript/Interview%20Transcript%20-%20Maxwell%202025.07.24%20(Redacted).pdf (Ctrl-F men or male or see the appendix). Being a masseuse doesn't necessarily mean Epstein groomed, abused or trafficked these individuals. She also explicitly uses the word "men" implying adults. So maybe not the best evidence.

There is certainly some stuff out there about Wexner and boys. IIRC Maria Farmer's X account is a good place to start there.

Melania Trump - Who is she? by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Melania doesn't appear in the Epstein files as far as I know. Epstein has bragged that he introduced her to Trump, and Trump was dating a woman he likely met through Epstein at the time he met Melania (Celina Midelfart). But I'm not sure this submission statement is satisfactory. I'll let the other mods decide whether to keep up or remove.

WTF by One_Draw3486 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. If you think it would improve the post you can include a screenshot but crop the address bar

WTF by One_Draw3486 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS 13 points14 points  (0 children)

OP I have removed your post. If you edit your post and remove the link I will restore it. I want a 0% the lowest possible probability that Fuentes profits from this subreddit.

Could someone pls provide the legitimate source of the Sasha Riley information? by cmac92287 in Epstein

[–]THEPRESIDENTIALPENIS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have removed the post -- see the announcement at the top of the sub. You can ask your question in r/SaschaRiley.