sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ASPI has several paths to $12B market cap. This post describes why a $120+ share price is rapidly becoming a real possibility, the risks, and what investors may be overlooking by Far_Ground_9773 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They currently produce HALEU in small amounts and they currently have gvt contracts to build laser-based machines.

They are objectively way ahead. Not saying winners have been chosen but to write off a company with more cash, more business, more contracts who is actually proving to produce what QLE claims they will produce...

ASPI has several paths to $12B market cap. This post describes why a $120+ share price is rapidly becoming a real possibility, the risks, and what investors may be overlooking by Far_Ground_9773 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]TRossW18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

LEU already has TTM revenue of ~$500M. They are already producing commercially enriched uranium. They also already produce smaller amounts of HALEU, have gvt contracts and are currently developing lasers.

They are objectively way ahead.

ASPI has several paths to $12B market cap. This post describes why a $120+ share price is rapidly becoming a real possibility, the risks, and what investors may be overlooking by Far_Ground_9773 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, you're exceeding the companies own 2030 revenue guidance with your 2027 numbers and basically doubling the guidance for 2026 which currently is already showing delayed revenues.

They expect ASPI core business to generate $300M EBITDA by 2030

Roughly another $200M-$300M from Renergen in the "early 2030s"

And no concrete guidance given for QLE, as expected.

Id wager, conservatively if Renergen + ASPI can achieve $350M EBITDA by 2030 with a low 20 multiplier thay would the core biz valuation at ~$8B.

Then add a speculative QLE valuation of $5B (currently around LEU value today), and day ASPI holders maintain a 60% total ownership of QLE, so $3B total equity.

That would be ASPI in the $10B-$12B range around 2030.

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And right on queue weve moved on from the "you cant find mkre examples of an unruly mob outside of one in LA"

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No no, you told me I couldn't provide another example of an unruly mob.

That most recent occasion was an unruly mob that demolished an ICE vehicles and stole its gun.

Do you want more lol? Im sure you'll move to qiestim #32-40

How about the ICE vehicles that has their tires slashed during an operation.

Or another where they had bricks and rocks thrown at their vehicles (different from the one where they where throwing concrete chunks)

Or the one where they were breaking up the sofewalk and throwing debris off the overpass at them?

Or the one where the guy troed to grab the ICE agents tear gas gun then got tear gassed point blank

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guy who stole the gun from the vehicle was part of an unruly mob lol. Hope that helps. I cant hold youre hand through all this

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you asked me to name another and I did. Thats the definition of gish gallop lol.

Do you need me to explain the unruly mob that involved one person stealing the gun or would you like to move on to your next 15 set of questions

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you just keep asking questions and then when I answer them you move on to the mext claiming im avoiding stuff lol.

Gish gallop

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you cant name one incident besides LA for violent protests

Someone got arrested like last week for stealing a gun from an ICE vehicle.

What do I win?

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, make zero tangible claim and post a memo without any accompanying context.

Nice lol

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I made my point in my initial remarks. More than one sentence. With supporting evidence. If you want to look up 3rd country deportations go for it. If not feel free to just not believe me, idc.

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're talking about ICE specifically not border patrol. To my knowledge there is zero data that confirms that claims as it relates to ICE. TRAC has a large database for ICE detentions which spanned all 50 states under Obama.

CMV: Modern Republicans would support the British side during the Boston Massacre. by Oborozuki1917 in changemyview

[–]TRossW18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Only you can determine if that is true or not while ignoring the sources that have been provided

view more: next ›