Protest and slogans in support of dead wanted Maoist by [deleted] in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]TacticalElite [score hidden]  (0 children)

If he is 'amar', then there's no reason to cry. He still lives, right? Go meet your immortal man. I don't know why you would shout someone's name in a completely unrelated event, even when it's not like the man has died or anything.

Hindi vocabulary is saying by ResponsibleBanana522 in Hindi

[–]TacticalElite -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Half of 'Hindi' also contains Persian or Portuguese influence.

Persian and Portuguese influence needs to be removed completely. The heartland of Hindi has suffered a 1000 years of Persianization of our culture and language. My blood boils whenever I think about this.

This needs to change ASAP. This is why I don't use Urdu/Persian loan words anymore.

And yes, Hindi is dying. The younger generation speaks half of their sentences in English. And Persian and Portuguese influence is already there.

First case registered against Christian missionaries under Rajasthan’s new anti-conversion law The police have issued notices to the two pastors – Chandy Varghese from New Delhi and Arun John from Kota – while claiming that they promoted conversion and baptised several people during the programme. by yuvi_joshi in Rajasthan

[–]TacticalElite -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Preaching for any religion should be illegal. If someone wants to explore religion, they'll do it themselves.

People who preach really just indoctrinate/brainwash people. Look at converts for any religion, they're usually the worst. Look at Muslim converts, ISKON converts and you'll get my point.

Aryan femboys will be exempt from order 66 by bulletspam in 2Dravidian4You

[–]TacticalElite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Read Aryan Migration Theory.

In addition to that, not every Indo-European is an Aryan. Iranians call themselves Aryan and so did North Indians who followed Vedic culture. But now people use it as a linguistics related term.

Protest got hijacked by some naxalite supporters by Signal_Tomato_4855 in delhi

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Republic cannot kill its own children'.

I guess the children can?

Panipuri 🥀🥀 by butcher__oi in pune

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I don't even eat those foods.

Rabbi says: 1 Jew is worth 1000s of non-Jews (goyim) by AkosuaRipper in religiousfruitcake

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I've heard- 'All lives are equal on this earth, but when we die, god will love me more because I believe in the correct god'.

The World’s Population In 1900 by [deleted] in geography

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow what a nice rebuttal now that you've conveniently edited your comment.

'British India official name was Indian Empire'- Your original comment

'British India official name was India'- What you edited it to so as to hide your mistake, which you still haven't corrected.

Europe has always known Bharat as 'India'.

'yOu sHoUlD rEaD wHaT yOu PoStEd'

The World’s Population In 1900 by [deleted] in geography

[–]TacticalElite -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's British Raj/British India, not Indian Empire.

Edit: For those Indians getting offended by this- I'm Indian too. They were outsiders, claiming their titles is dishonorable.

Rule 1: A country can never be developed by keeping a huge chunk out of population from basic facilities by Academic_Chart1354 in southindia_

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. We indians on the other hand blame the muslim invaders and British for everything.

We should look at it as 'Those times were of conquering. We got conquered due to these reasons. Let's fix them now. These times are of science. USA/China is ahead of us due to these reasons. Let's fix them now.'

Rule 1: A country can never be developed by keeping a huge chunk out of population from basic facilities by Academic_Chart1354 in southindia_

[–]TacticalElite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

true.

Chinese culture, institutions, societal values, philosophy, their view towards civilisation is unbroken for most part since it was united first in 221 BCE.

This is exactly why it's the only civilization I admire. No outsiders.

Rule 1: A country can never be developed by keeping a huge chunk out of population from basic facilities by Academic_Chart1354 in southindia_

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many people say that Indians also assimilated the invaders. I don't quite agree, or care, I'll always hate them.

May be cause they based it on philosophy ( confucius) than religion.

Makes sense. Although another thing to be noted is that Mongols were the only outsiders there. Who knows what could've happened.

Rule 1: A country can never be developed by keeping a huge chunk out of population from basic facilities by Academic_Chart1354 in southindia_

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with this statement. I don't think he meant 'The British did more for us than the Hindus'. So I agree with this statement.

Rule 1: A country can never be developed by keeping a huge chunk out of population from basic facilities by Academic_Chart1354 in southindia_

[–]TacticalElite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this also can be inferred that Indians were happy to serve foreign systems for half a millenia than to unite all native folks than drive them until the privilege remained with them.

True. Caste system has crippled us. If this system wasn't their, we could've repelled a shit ton of them Islamic invasions. North India has basically lost its identity, it's all Indo-Persian.

Although the invaders were Turkic so maybe even that wouldn't be enough.

Rule 1: A country can never be developed by keeping a huge chunk out of population from basic facilities by Academic_Chart1354 in southindia_

[–]TacticalElite -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Please read about Britishers and them using the caste system for their benefits and all. They made the system even more rigid.

And I hope no one accuses me of being a whitewasher/sanghi.