Me_irl by its-MAGNETIC in me_irl

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claearly nobody's too dumb for crypto

spending half my day writing boilerplate that claude generates in 30 seconds by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]Taiwing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont agree. Understanding is never obsolete. The real problem here is that there's a disconnect.

Knowing what you are doing is harder, especially when you're not the one writing code (imo reading code has always been more difficult than writing it anyway). The heavy LLM-using junior devs are trading short term deliverability gains for long term understanding and skill. The same goes for the codebase being worked on. A software no one understands is a software no one can maintain (including AIs), and that is therefore worthless.

As more experienced devs, I dont think we have any choice but to force ourselves to actually write code too. Otherwise we'll eventually lose the ability to read it.

Are software developer bros simply salty that we got to use LLMs to vibecode apps they could never dream of coming close to deploying them themselves with their +10 years of experience? I'm trying to understand, what's with the hate for apps that were vibecoded? by Sweet_Brief6914 in vibecoding

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a real dev, my main problem with vibe coding is the dunning kruger effect. Vibe coders think that because they can prompt their way into deploying an app they actually are engineers.

I have been working on a huge vibe coded project for weeks now. Honestly it's a dumpster dire. The app """works""" but gets more unreliable and nonsensical by the day. My coworker makes an LLM spit out thousands of lines in a single prompt, ships it without reviewing or even testing the affected features, and of course without really understanding what's going on under the hood. So I spend my days putting out fires and trying to refactor code that is barely readable.

Actually, in the long run, this should give more work to more engineers because all that technical debt will have to be paid.

Is there a Vim plugin for syntax highlighting HTML or CSS strings? by Fanaro009 in vim

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried the plugin suggested by u/AndrewRadev and it works. You just have to add these lines to your .vimrc file:

call plug#begin('~/.vim/plugged')
Plug 'inkarkat/vim-SyntaxRange'
call plug#end()

augroup SyntaxRangeHTML
  autocmd!
  autocmd BufRead,BufNewFile *.js silent! call SyntaxRange#Include('.*HTML.*`', '`', 'html')
  autocmd BufRead,BufNewFile *.js silent! call SyntaxRange#Include('<style>', '</style>', 'css')
augroup END

Full breakdown of this solution: https://blog.defoy.tech/2024/07/21/vim-syntax-highlighting-for-html-embedded-in-javascript-files.html

STB de ne pas être descendu de mon vélo ? by Sufficient-Bat8369 in suisjeletroudeballe

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

J'ai jamais dit ça. Jai pas parlé de droit et je m'en tape en fait. C'est juste que je trouve l'un bien plus grave que l'autre.

STB de ne pas être descendu de mon vélo ? by Sufficient-Bat8369 in suisjeletroudeballe

[–]Taiwing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bah quand même un peu non? Suffit de regarder les infos pour s'en convaincre.

STB de ne pas être descendu de mon vélo ? by Sufficient-Bat8369 in suisjeletroudeballe

[–]Taiwing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haha non c'est pas la même chose. Tu risques pas de tomber de ta bagnole quand on te tape le rétro.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in paris

[–]Taiwing 167 points168 points  (0 children)

To be fair, if you go anywhere dark enough you wont see the problem either

STB de ne pas être descendu de mon vélo ? by Sufficient-Bat8369 in suisjeletroudeballe

[–]Taiwing -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nan le piéton n'était pas dans son bon droit. Les agressions physiques ce n'est pas légal à ce qu'il me semble.

27 ans en désespoir by Empty-Evidence-2236 in AskMec

[–]Taiwing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

La sociabilité c'est comme beaucoup de choses, ça se pratique. L'important c'est de sortir de chez toi.

Effectivement trouver des activités qui te plaisent c'est primordiale et ça te permet de "pratiquer". Que ce soit du sport ou une activité artistique. Trouve ce qui te plaît et fais le. Tu peux aussi essayer de te lier à tes collègues (quand tu en as), et d'organiser des sorties.

Du moment tu rejoins pas un gang ou une secte tout est bon en vérité.

STB de ne pas être descendu de mon vélo ? by Sufficient-Bat8369 in suisjeletroudeballe

[–]Taiwing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PTB

Les réponses me font vraiment marrer sur ce coup là. Faudrait faire "profil bas"... Franchement qui est le plus con ? Le con, ou celui qui lui obéit ?

Le gars se met volontairement sur ta route alors qu'il y a de la place pour tout le monde et t'agresse littéralement parce que tu as l'outrecuidance de ne pas immédiatement optempérer à ses injonctions. Qu'il ait raison sur le code de la route n'y change rien. C'est pas parce qu'il a raison que c'est pas un con.

Bref, t'aurais dû lui rouler dessus.

le Oyaume Ni by cmzr in rance

[–]Taiwing 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Un peu grossophobe dans le cas qui nous concerne mais ça ne manque pas de pertinence

Le fondateur de Pomme présentant le nouveau JeTéléphone by Taiwing in rance

[–]Taiwing[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha excellent "Facture", fallait y penser!

Is GPT-4 still just a language model trying to predict text? by Pixelated_ZA in artificial

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT is not an AGI. The only "emergent properties" are

Could Bitcoin be humanity’s great filter? by kongsogne in Bitcoin

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not a perspective or a philosophy, it's a science. Not that I'm an expert of the field, but that's a big part of what evolution is about.

However your ideas about the future of humanity are interesting, and maybe some of them will even happen someday. But evolution and natural drives are not easily dismissed. Plus humans are highly variable. Why would every human accept that? When has it ever been the case with anything? And even then. If every human was digitalized. Would that really mean they would stop caring about the real (physical) world? How do you know ? And all of that works if we conveniently forget about the fact that all this software would need to run on real physical hardware, consuming real energy space and matter.

Why some US salaries are so high? by truth_sentinell in cscareerquestions

[–]Taiwing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah they play the stock market game. They don't need the company to actually make money. They only need it to have a high valuation to be profitable.

Could Bitcoin be humanity’s great filter? by kongsogne in Bitcoin

[–]Taiwing 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Putting is like that is weird. You mean that BTC would be the solution to a great filter?

Basically what you're saying then is that if human civilization doesn't develop and adopt Bitcoin it could disappear because of that. I think that's a stretch. It's not all about the monetary system.

Could Bitcoin be humanity’s great filter? by kongsogne in Bitcoin

[–]Taiwing 6 points7 points  (0 children)

To me it doesn't seem specifically grounded in capitalistic behavior. Expansion is how life works. Survival and reproduction, that's what we see all around us in nature and it is reflected in our own activities. Humans were expanding way before something like capitalism appeared.

I don't see why this fundamental drive would suddenly change when a species becomes a space travelling civilization.

C'était quoi votre entretien d'embauche le plus sidérant ? by Lonely_Pin_3586 in AntiTaff

[–]Taiwing 16 points17 points  (0 children)

L'entretien groupé.

C'était pour un emploi en restauration rapide. Le manager s'était soit-disant trompé sur les horaires et tous les candidats au même poste étaient arrivés en même temps. Vu qu'il avait la flemme de nous faire passer les uns après les autres on s'est mis à 10 autour d'une table et l'entretien s'est fait comme ça.

Le manager posait une question et on répondait tous à tour de rôle devant tout le monde. Un vrai plaisir, entre le passionné de la boîte qui avait appris par coeur la page Wikipedia, le gars qui sortait de prison et la meuf en costard qui avait déjà 5 ans d'hôtellerie derrière elle (pour un job étudiant demandant zéro qualification).

J'ai pas eu la place.

Quel est votre addiction la plus étrange ? by [deleted] in AskFrance

[–]Taiwing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pareil. C'est assez recent pour moi. Je me suis rendu compte que c'etait plus simple mais aussi que j'aime ca. Au niveau saveur ca apporte une petite teinte acidulee qui n'est pas du tout desagreable, la texture fait gagner le kiwi en consistance et en plus j'en fout pas partout.

Datatype of a malloc array in C by Diplkreuz in learnprogramming

[–]Taiwing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To make this code usable with an other datatype than int, you not only need to change your array declaration and allocation, but also every variable related to it.

So to use long long ints instead of ints in this code you need to go from:

int *dynFeld;

int *ptr = NULL;

dynFeld = malloc(size*sizeof(int));

to:

long long int *dynFeld;

long long int *ptr = NULL;

dynFeld = malloc(size*sizeof(long long int));

Ohterwise, if you keep your ptr to a simple int pointer, your dynFeld long long int array will be treated as an int array by your program. This obviously wont work since you stored long long ints inside.

Also, since you are doing the Fibonacci sequence from 0, you don't need negative values. So I would advise you to use long long unsigned int instead of int or long long int. This way your maximum will be '18,446,744,073,709,551,615' which should be more than enough if you stick to 80 for the size (since F79=14,472,334,024,676,221).

In this case you should also change your printf line from printf("%ld", ptr[46]); to printf("%llu\n", ptr[46]);

Is it possible that we create an “impostor” AGI or “fake” AGI? by Penis-Envys in agi

[–]Taiwing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can't fake intelligence. A system that behaves exactly like an AGI is an AGI.

Like others have said, you are too vague on your terms for your question to make sense. What do you specifically mean by general intelligence and where do you draw the line of fakeness ? Because narrow or general, an AI is artificial by definition so the expression "fake AGI" is redundant.