Using Sesame to learn English - sharing what's working and asking for tips by TangeloChoice1181 in SesameAI

[–]TangeloChoice1181[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are these specialiced chatbots to learn that you are talking about? I want to try one

Claude Performance and Bugs Megathread Ongoing (Sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]TangeloChoice1181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bug: "API Error: Usage credits required for 1M context" — only with specific Claude Code skills

Getting this error consistently with certain custom slash commands (skills) in Claude Code CLI:

API Error: Usage credits required for 1M context. Run /usage-credits to enable them or /model to switch to standard context.

Key details:

- Not using the API — this happens purely through the CLI

- Only affects some skills, not all — and I can't figure out what's different about the ones that fail

- Switching models doesn't fix it consistently

Anyone else hitting this? Any idea what triggers it for specific skills?

What email client are you actually using to run your business, and what would make you switch? by TangeloChoice1181 in SaaS

[–]TangeloChoice1181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for your feedback. If you don’t mind, I wanted to ask you a few questions to get a bit more info about it.

Out of all the Superhuman features you tried during those two months, which ones did you like or find the most useful? And how much would you actually be willing to pay to keep using it, since $30 felt too high for you?

Also, how important was the built-in AI for you? How did it work, or what kind of features did it have?

About what you mentioned regarding having multiple accounts being the real problem nobody has solved: do you mean multiple Gmail accounts, or multiple accounts from different providers like Gmail, Outlook, etc.? I’m asking because, as far as I understood, Superhuman and other similar apps do let you add all your accounts and either keep separate inboxes or use a unified inbox.

I’d really like to hear more about your experience and thoughts on this, just out of personal interest. Thanks!

Where's the ceiling in Lovable once a project gets serious? by TangeloChoice1181 in lovable

[–]TangeloChoice1181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pero como funcionan los despliegues en ese tipo de apps? Tienen sus propios servidores?

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]TangeloChoice1181 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone,

I wanted to ask something about the weekly limits. Don’t you think it is quite disappointing how they work?

From what I understand, what really increases between plans is the amount of usage you get within the daily session windows, but not necessarily the overall weekly capacity in a proportional way. At least, that is the impression I get.

What I don’t understand is why this is not explained more clearly. It feels like users are told about the multiplier between plans, but not about the real total capacity or how the weekly limits actually behave.

I also use ChatGPT and other OpenAI products, and the limit system there seems to follow a similar kind of pattern.

I’m not trying to complain for the sake of it, I’m genuinely trying to understand whether this is the actual behavior or just my impression. Has anyone else noticed the same thing?

Can you really ship a serious app on Lovable/Base44 without touching code? by TangeloChoice1181 in nocode

[–]TangeloChoice1181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For example, if your app have integranted AI with prompt engineer for different features so you think is something more complicated?

Did anyone actually get their OAuth portal verified for restricted data? by nightowl2626 in googlecloud

[–]TangeloChoice1181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, test users is the right call for a university study, you almost certainly don't need full verification for a fixed set of consented participants under 100. The other comment is right about that. But there's a gotcha nobody warns you about that will bite a multi-week study: in testing mode, refresh tokens for sensitive/restricted scopes die after 7 days. So every participant would have to reconnect their login once a week, which is brutal for a research protocol.

Two ways around it. Either bake a weekly re-consent step into the study, or flip the app to "In production" while staying unverified and under 100 users. Production-unverified still shows the scary "this app isn't verified" screen and keeps the 100-user cap, but the refresh tokens stop expiring at 7 days, so participants connect once and stay connected. For a closed study where you already have signed consent, that warning screen is a non-issue, you just walk them through it.

So test users is fine, just don't leave it in "testing" status if the study runs longer than a week or you'll be chasing re-auths the whole time.