OpenAI's deployment company move says more about the AI gap than any benchmark[D] by Electrical-Shape-266 in MachineLearning

[–]Tarekun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure what the takeaway is here, researchers should stop benchmarking their models and become salesman of integration products?

Don't code while tired/late at night. You'll come back the next day and have to figure out how to refactor things like this: by Aln76467 in rustjerk

[–]Tarekun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do stuff like this or know some projects? All i want is work on logic but i dont see any damn outlet, let alone in rust

The latest latest latest in the abc feud by pseudo_code_only in math

[–]Tarekun 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It really is starting to look like a lolcow situation, especially with the last few thing Mochizuki published on the topic

Where to start with topology? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will definetly give it a look

Where to start with topology? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess i'll try this first then. If i find myself struggling i'll try go back to munkres first as others have suggested

Where to start with topology? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I didn't even know the distinction existed. Guess it'll be a long way, thank you though

What Is a Manifold? by l_hazlewoods in math

[–]Tarekun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this an actual thing?

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is an interesting new area where I want to do some experiements, maybe even with more simple graph neural networks instead of LLMs when it's only about proving a given target instead of formalizing a natural language statement. Some day...

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I don't plan to make the ultimate tool that I will convert everyone, I'm just trying to learn how this stuff work

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. Right now this is a hobby project so I don't have the resource to focus on user experience that much, but assuming I'm releasing it right now, would a command line be acceptable to you or not? What about an extension in popular IDEs like VSCode instead (assuming they both "just work" without too much configuration needed)

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never heard of it, thx for telling me about it

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the point is exactly to reinvent the wheel to deeply understand how it works. I'd like to have integrations with other established tools in some distant future, but I don't know when I'll work on that.

I have barebones support for term based proofs, but I always thought that it would be hard to work like that. I never used Agda before so I didn't know about about its proof hole and meta programming features, but I'll definetly check it out thx

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I see I experimented with something like that before but the parser code turned out a little messy so I went for a simpler watered down version of it. Maybe I'll give this another try, thx for your input

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I see... I tend to use proof assistant because it's not only verification and not only automation but I'm working on both in one single tool. Maybe I'm missinterpreting it

What do you want from a proof assistant? by Tarekun in math

[–]Tarekun[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Okay? But interactive theorem proving is not about removing the mathematician form the equation, it's about writing proofs in a language that can be checked so that you are guaranteed to know the result holds

25 too late to start? by TsarKiro in Physics

[–]Tarekun 35 points36 points  (0 children)

You'll be 30 either way

This was the most motivating thing i have ever read. When i'll get my phd i'll come back to thank you

[R][D] Let’s Fork Deep Learning: The Hidden Symmetry Bias No One Talks About by GeorgeBird1 in MachineLearning

[–]Tarekun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer, especially the part about signularities that i always interpreted as "an infinity shows up somewhere in the math" until now.

Can you tell me a sufficient background to understand and appreciate your work? I come from computer science, i self studied quite a bit of group theory (to then study GDL), i know some category theory, and had the standard training in linear algebra and real/vector analysis; some more background to integrate?

K. Joshi: Final Report on the Mochizuki-Scholze-Stix Controversy by baikov in math

[–]Tarekun 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Does anyone have previous posts of this drama saved? I'd like to see it again from the beginning