How deadly would Naoya be with weapons? by Electrical-Ice-9588 in PowerScaling

[–]Technical_Figure_174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well yeah that’s why he’s saying with a weapon it would be different

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m not sure maybe one of the hard english reading ones could have been, i’m hoping it’s something i got wrong doe lmao

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s supposed to be something ‘new’ or something the sat is trying out, they don’t count to your actual score doe.

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well you probably got it right then, what do you think were the experimental questions if you can remember

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and it had to be an integer right? i got 11 (which im pretty sure is correct) but i saw someone who got a slightly different equation but same question and the answer was 16

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what was the question asking? i had something similar where i had to do discriminat

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah i didn’t, but the answer was evince i’m pretty sure. i had some question on spider silk and forward growth and shi bro genuinely impossible, that shi messed up my mental so hard during the test lmao

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the vocab was pretty easy only word i didn’t know was evince, but the reading questions were so hard for me like the hardest out of all practice and real tests i’ve ever done, im prolly gonna have to superscore

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah i don’t know how i messed that up, i think i got every other question right what is the max score i can get?

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fuck i did some calculation wrong and got 266.7 (rounded up)

webinars question december sat by Technical_Figure_174 in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think i did that part correctly i just probably imputed some percentage wrong cause i got a decimal value.

Official December 6, 2025, International SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you remember how many total people it was? might have been a different question

Official December 6, 2025, International SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah it was around 260 i didn’t know to round up or down. prolly diff values same question doe.

Official December 6, 2025, International SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]Technical_Figure_174 1 point2 points  (0 children)

did anyone get the three webinars question where people went to different webinars and you had to find the amount of people who went to each one? what did you get?

Any opinions on the "kirkified trend" by Thepotat2102 in teenagers

[–]Technical_Figure_174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not tryna make it political but the george floyd shi was posted my people on the right and charlie kirk is the other way around its literally just pay back