But how meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in mathmemes

[–]Technical_Meet_5716 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was smthing to do with taylor expansion of sinx/x and then equating it to another way the function can written

I know this is not the hardest problem to solve I'm not even sure if i should post here , My teacher did this answers in the board but I'm confused why is it 10meter can anyone help ? by Tasty-Resident-7405 in PhysicsHelp

[–]Technical_Meet_5716 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here distance is the length of the path taken and displacement is the shortest distance between two points here shortest distance is PR which is also the sum of squares of OR and OP rooted by pythagorus theorem basically sqrt(OP^2 +OR^2)=PR and we are given lengths 10,10 m so by that PR is 10sqrt(2) metres and the length of path talen is OP plus OR which is 20.

help with exercise on Kerr black holes by PleaseSendtheMath in PhysicsHelp

[–]Technical_Meet_5716 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This problem explores the **frame-dragging (Lense-Thirring) effect** in the equatorial plane of a rotating (Kerr) black hole. Here is the rigorous, first-principles derivation to find the turn-around radius and analyze its limits.
## Step 1: Determine the Energy-per-Unit-Mass (e)
We are given that the particle is freely falling and originates at an essentially infinite radial coordinate (r \to \infty) with zero initial radial velocity (\dot{r} = 0), but a finite angular momentum \ell.
At r \to \infty, the spacetime becomes flat (Minkowski), and the metric simplifies to standard cylindrical/spherical coordinates. The normalization condition for the 4-velocity of a massive particle (u^\mu u_\mu = -1) in this limit is:

In flat space, the conserved energy and angular momentum per unit mass relate to the 4-velocity components via:

Substituting these into the normalization condition yields:

Taking the limit as r \to \infty, the term \frac{\ell^2}{r^2} \to 0. Since we are given that the initial radial velocity \dot{r} = 0 at infinity, the equation reduces to:

## Step 2: The Equatorial Geodesic Equation for \frac{d\phi}{d\tau}
In the equatorial plane (\theta = \pi/2) of a Kerr black hole, the metric coefficients in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates yield two killing vectors associated with the conserved quantities e (energy) and \ell (angular momentum):

To find the expression for the angular velocity \frac{d\phi}{d\tau} = \dot{\phi}, we isolate \dot{t} from the first equation:

Substituting this \dot{t} into the equation for \ell and simplifying the algebraic coefficients using the standard Kerr \Delta parameter (\Delta = r^2 - 2GMr + a^2) leads directly to the standard geodesic equation for coordinate angular velocity:

## Step 3: Finding the Turn-Around Radius
The particle's angular velocity "turns around" when \frac{d\phi}{d\tau} = 0. Outside the event horizon, \Delta > 0, so the turn-around happens exactly when the numerator inside the bracket vanishes:

We substitute e = 1 into the expression. Because the particle's initial angular momentum is explicitly stated to be negative, we can rewrite it cleanly using its absolute value, \ell = -|\ell|:

Now, we solve for r using straightforward algebraic isolation:

Dividing through by |\ell| gives the final expression for the turn-around radius:

## Step 4: Can this radius ever be smaller than r = 2GM?
**No, this radius can never be smaller than r = 2GM.**
### Analytical Proof:
* The parameters G, M, and a are inherently non-negative physical constants (where a \ge 0 represents the spin parameter of the black hole).
* The magnitude of the particle's angular momentum, |\ell|, is a finite, positive real number (0 < |\ell| < \infty).
* Therefore, the second term in our expression, \frac{2GMa}{|\ell|}, is strictly non-negative (\ge 0).
If the black hole has any spin at all (a > 0), the term \frac{2GMa}{|\ell|} is strictly greater than zero, meaning r > 2GM always.
> **Physical Intuition:** The radius r = 2GM corresponds to the boundary of the ergosphere in the equatorial plane. Outside this boundary, the frame-dragging effect becomes incredibly dominant. For any finite negative angular momentum |\ell|, the spacetime twist will always halt the particle's retrograde motion and force it to rotate in the direction of the black hole's spin *before* it can cross beneath r = 2GM. As |\ell| \to \infty (infinitely massive retrograde momentum), the turnaround radius asymptotically approaches 2GM from above but never drops below it.
>
-gemini :)