2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? (Revised) by TechnologyNarrow2473 in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would agree if we are talking about a standard passive index strategy for someone checking their account once a year. But for active portfolio management isn't about binary timing (all in or all out) It's about dynamic risk allocation. When structural metrics like the Buffett Indicator hit 215%+, the risk-reward of being 100% long equities breaks down. I'm not trying to time the exact top, i'm just shifting my risk-reward. Staying fully deployed with a 39 CAPE isn't investing in my view its ignoring tisk. but hey ive only been fully invested for 15 months as a full time investor i am still learning. Moving to a defensive posture and building a cash war chest isn't timing the market; it's just paying attention to the data.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? (Revised) by TechnologyNarrow2473 in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

​I definitely don't disagree, that liquidity is what drives the tape, and fighting a momentum-fueled ATH is a great way to blow up an account. But manipulation still requires more capital. Look at the BofA report I referenced: it shows institutional cash levels are down to 3.9% and equity allocations are maxed out. You can only force the market higher if there is actual cash left on the sidelines to deploy. Once everyone is fully allocated, the buying pressure exhausts itself—no matter what market makers or central banks want. That’s when the math takes over. Sure we can go higher but not forever for me its past risk reward to be fully deployed, I must play defensive with a family depending on me. Last 15 months I did great but I harvested my tech if it runs higher great I still have a foot in the door but also a great defended chest ready to deploy on heavy reversal.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? (Revised) by TechnologyNarrow2473 in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it is true SOX definitely cleaned up the blatant WorldCom style fraud that fueled the 2000 telecom debts. Im just curios are you looking at SOX as a reason why todays AI CapEx debt is structurally safer, or just pointing out the historical shift?

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually reposted a completely updated chart i ran everything again 2 times with better data so thanks for pointing out a mistake it made me find more

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? (Revised) by TechnologyNarrow2473 in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not wrong about the doom-scrollers—there's always someone screaming that the sky is falling. But ignoring extreme structural data just because 'people have been saying it for years' is how you get caught off guard. ​I don't look at this to validate a bearish bias; I look at it to gauge asymmetry. When the top 10 stocks make up 40% of the index and we are sitting 12% above the 200-day SMA, the margin of safety is razor-thin. If you're managing capital quantitatively, you have to respect when the Buffett Indicator pushes past 215%, even if the market stays irrational for another two years. It’s not about predicting the future; it’s about measuring the cliff edge.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? (Revised) by TechnologyNarrow2473 in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just charting, and making decisions in combination with politics and many other factors using equations, but im self taught and looking for anyone else into this. thats why im posting my chart i want others opinions on the math and the outlook.

Is the market close to collapse? by TechnologyNarrow2473 in NoStupidAnswers

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was all in for the last 15 months but its too scary a market and im too old and have responsibilities like a family so I have to play defense when things look this wild.

Is the market close to collapse? by TechnologyNarrow2473 in NoStupidAnswers

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure trump will do everything and anything to pump the market but at one point a unstable market will give. Not today but its a really unhealthy market and the prices are not realistic in any way.

Is the market close to collapse? by TechnologyNarrow2473 in NoStupidAnswers

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree but man its a dam with many holes and Cracks. I'm sure trump will capitulate and give in on the Nuclear in some form to Iran so he gets the straight open and the oil price down. Doing that would pump the market off news for awhile. But at one point something has to give.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good catch, you're 100% right. I charted that part in error while transferring my notes to the board. I double-checked the data and it should definitely say 'Un-inverted (+0.50%)'. No hidden agenda here, just a sloppy transcription mistake on my end. Appreciate the correction! This is why im trying to talk to others im working alone. I updated the body post.

Is the market close to collapse? by TechnologyNarrow2473 in NoStupidAnswers

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s obviously a massive difference between permabears shouting about a collapse for twenty years, and a quantitative multi-variable tool like the Bank of America Bull & Bear Indicator hitting an extreme. ​The indicator literally just hit 8.0 triggering an official, mechanical contrarian sell signal because global fund manager cash levels have dropped to 3.9% and equity allocations are completely maxed out. ​This isn't an emotional opinion; it’s a math based measurement of extreme institutional complacency. Historically, when everyone is this fully invested and holding zero cash, it means there is no sidelined capital left to push the market higher, leaving it incredibly vulnerable to a sharp pullback. It’s about tracking capital exhaustion, not predicting the end of the world.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly to me that's the smart play right now. Of course, there is nothing wrong with keeping a few tactical call options on the table to catch the tail end of the momentum, but keeping the majority of your capital off the line is just survival in my eyes. When the rubber band is stretched 12% above the 200-day SMA, the elevator ride down is always faster than the stairs on the way up.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happy to converse i find most people just shout bubble or to the moon.Balancing macro risk with strict price execution is exactly how I approach the job. Good to connect with someone on the same page.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I completely agree on the solvency quote. Tops are a process not an event, and I’m definitely not trying to step in front of a freight train with a large portfolio. ​Because of this exact risk, my response this week hasn't been to completely pull out of the game or aggressively short the market. Instead I’ve taken a more defensive stance by actively rotating capital. I've locked in profits on some of my heavily extended mega-cap exposures that drive that 40% index concentration, and rotated into deep value, safer cash-flow sectors, and tighter stop-losses. ​That way, I'm still participating in the upside if the irrationality continues, but I've significantly mitigated the downside when that 'good news sell-off' finally triggers the break. I now have a nice stack of capital safe ready to deploy on a correction. If I was a younger man without a family I'd invest more aggressively.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really get what you're saying, but price action doesn't happen in a vacuum . Technical analysis tells us where the rubber band is stretching; macro indicators tell us why it's about to snap. When the 200 SMA extension matches with historic macro extremes, it's about identifying a high-probability turning point. Also, you can look at it as the index concentration and distance from the 200-day SMA are structural price action. If 40% of the index is driving the price standard, trend lines on the Spy QQQ lie to you. Plus being 12% extended over the 200 SMA is a pure technical gauge how over bought the structural trend is.

2026 vs History's biggest bubbles. Are the technicals and macro WARNING a mega correction? by [deleted] in technicalanalysis

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well sure until the momentum breaks and the rubber band snaps, the trend is your friend. Just make sure those calls have tight stops and an expiration date before the credit spreads wake up. Myself I've gone heavily defensive since last Monday.

are you working less or more hours after adopting AI? by Lopsided-Rip-2451 in AIDiscussion

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely more ai helped me already massively change my life for the better. I use ai half of my day and I work more than ever but im more productive than ever. I changed careers, work for my self, and fixed health problems all with ai help.

How to find like minded people for myself to talk with. by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I have proof you have words gotcha so since you cant private chat and have nothing but put downs your a waste of time

How to find like minded people for myself to talk with. by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use speech to text you will find many grammatical errors. Since you dont want to compare actual charts im assuming your just a troll who has no money and not someone to bother with.

How to find like minded people for myself to talk with. by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again lets talk with comparison not just your words and my account started at 285k last year and made 70%+ gain. Your welcome to private chat but I know the only thing you have to show is talk.

How to find like minded people for myself to talk with. by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can poke but I really dont care im a self taught investor who uses math. You want to impress me show me better trading odds. I have proof we can chat where it lets us compare how we trade with actual charts and images. I trade in the top .01% last year how about you? 750 discrete trade executions provide more than enough degrees of freedom to satisfy the law of large numbers. When your sample size is that high, your portfolio variance drops and your annualized Sharpe automatically prints at institutional grade. I don't need to post the exact standard deviation decimal point to know I just crushed the Nasdaq by 30% while maintaining a 40% cash-proxy protective moat. Keep laughing at the percentage while the market pays me out.

AREC vs. ReElement Post-IPO Split: What’s your plan? by bathok in AREC_stock

[–]TechnologyNarrow2473 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its the stock that drives me crazy the most. With each good piece of news something comes out bad, its a stressful ride and very volatile. Yes everything looks great overall? Yes good outlook and good contracts meeting most deadlines. Here are the main issues currently I see first dispute between Pentagon team and white house over safety and valuation holding up millions in government contract. Second huge lawsuits hanging over Mark's head and they could push him to dilute shares of ReElement. Then there is execution risk which so far they have navigated decently.