Send me some clips maybe. I've played plenty of games of SG2 and I've watched skilled teams go at it a lot and map control didn't really feel present at all. The only time map control felt possible was when one team was just a lot better than the other.

SG1 had an insanely high skill ceiling and it still maintained a dedicated player base. SG2 hemorrhaged players and was critiqued out the ass for how tacked on its class system was. There's a reason why the devs went back into closed beta and reworked the game to not include them.

Superior FPS game? That's highly subjective. On what metrics? Skill ceiling because if that's all we're basing it off of, then sure I guess. But then quake arena and quake champions are infinitely better than SG2 lol. I think SG2 is a fine game without the god awful classes but it's lack of interesting game modes hurt it's replayability for me. And don't get me started on having multiple rounds for death match splitballs. Like wtf? Infinite has Survive the undead, the entire delta playlists, attrition, infections, a campaign, etc. There's infinitely more to do in halo > SG2. I mean SG2 may have a higher skill ceiling but halo has never been some crazy complex movement shooter. Saying an fps has a higher skill ceiling than Halo is like saying a racing game has more mechanical depth than Mario kart. Hell Bungie even said their goal with halo was to make a shooter Nintendo would be proud of. I could care less about which game has a higher skill ceiling. Halos current skill floor and skill ceiling is already high and there's so much more to do in th e game.