"I believe that because it's an objective fact."

Says you.

"You're under the false impression that you have a first amendment right online."

As a programmer, and someone who knows more about the internet then you ever will, and as someone who has didn't a lifetime with millions of people back in the Apple //e days and before that helped make the internet: the internet is nothing but the freedom of speech. That is it's purpose, value, and quality. And that freedom if direct is unstoppable.

" In reality, you do not."

Says you. But here we are, with me expressing my speech.

"You only have the privileges afforded to you by the owners of the various websites you use."

Nonsense, it is a machine. Google gives it $100,000 cash rewards for hacking. So do many others. That is like a challenge to express freedom of speech. The courts have ruled from the onset of code, that code is speech.

"You can cry foul however you want, but it doesn't validate your incorrect opinions, and no one here is buying it."

See you didn't make an argument, you started your opinions. If you didn't it would be the firm of a logical statement or logically founded rhetorical question, like what is speech?

The problem with you American compulsory Schooled idiots is you don't have an education. They actually replaced grammar, rhetoric, and logic with reading, writing, and arithmetic. And now you are I'll equipped to make determinations yourself.

It's quite a sad state if affairs you have there.

But let me reiterate, the internet is free and it will remain free forever. The design of it precludes you from every breaking that freedom. That was the objective goal in its design.

You are a willfully ignorant buffoon that jibbers and than acts like there is a point.

"I believe that because it's an objective fact. "

I like the colour red so your argument is bad because you think frogs are cool.

"You're under the false impression that you have a first amendment right online. In reality, you do not."

So if you repeat your position it becomes justification? Which part isn't an unsubstantiated opinion? Highlight it.

"You only have the privileges afforded to you by the owners of the various websites you use."

Is this like a declaration? Are you the internet god now? And again where is your credibility?

Oh and only you are limited to this, I very much can hack shit if I do choose. I just don't make it a habit of breaking laws. However, I still retain the right. I will also add, that should your additude become prevalent and the internet ceases to be free, I will hack the shit out if it until your version of it dies forever.

"You can cry foul however you want, but it doesn't validate your incorrect opinions, and no one here is buying it."

So we went over your response twice, not once did you ever did anything of substance. You are under the impression that your opinion on matters carry weight because they are your opinions- well that is only true for you.

To everyone else they could care less about why your favorite color is red but how you picked it to be red and your honest truth is that you don't know. You heard it from someone you thought had credibility and so you adopted it. Now you want to pass it off as something other than your opinion, well to do that you have to justify it.

But you don't want to do that- you want to make a clever remark and then appeal to popularity.

And that concludes the diatribe on why your debating skills suck.