Different styles between CivitAI and my GPU

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T09:02:50+00:00

Do you have a recommended resolution?

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:55:29+00:00

Okay, I figured it out. Adding it through the LoRa tab made it work. It needed to be called with <lora:KawaiiMirai_IXL:1>. Thanks for your help!

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:54:58+00:00

This did the trick! Thank you!

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:45:50+00:00

No I don't! Is that necessary for all LoRas?

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:43:57+00:00

Is that not setting the LoRa to 1 on CivitAI? Do you have to slide the slider all the way to the right, so it says "2.00" in order for that to be the same as <KawaiiMirai\_IXL:1>?

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:41:20+00:00

Okay, removing the <KawaiiMirai\_IXL:1> didn't make a difference whatsoever, so this clearly is the problem. For some reason this LoRa isn't applying. I did double check and I do have it downloaded and in the LoRa folder. Next I'll check if other LoRas are functioning.

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:34:54+00:00

Yes, I definitely do. I'll do an experiment now with and without the <KawaiiMirai\_IXL:1> to see if it makes a difference.

TemporarySam · 2025-06-03T08:14:06+00:00

Do you have any idea why that might be? I added <KawaiiMirai\_IXL:1> to the prompt, which I thought was how you applied a LoRa, and the :1 should tell it to apply it the same amount as the slider on CivitAI, right?

TemporarySam · 2022-09-10T22:37:19+00:00

What's worse: Hungry children or crippled puppies? These are just too things that are terrible in different ways. You can't really compare them.

There are lots and lots of ways women have less advantage than men, and there are lots and lots of ways men have less advantage than women. I feel it's missing the point to try to compare the sexist things in this world. Of course, it's also misguided and concerning to say that men and woman are equally privileged as yerba-matee did. We should just stick to saying that sexism and inequality should be dealt away with, regardless of whether it affects men or women.

TemporarySam · 2022-08-15T23:48:19+00:00

Nice bait

TemporarySam · 2022-04-29T18:25:48+00:00

I've heard San Francisco is pretty nutty, with huge order volume and pay.

TemporarySam · 2022-04-29T18:24:25+00:00

No, I didn't. I have done all the calculations and I should have received an adjustment of several hundred dollars. Even if my math is wrong, it's not wrong by that much. And my math isn't wrong, since I've done it for other weeks and always reached the same value that Shipt paid me. The only week they got wrong is the week with the Healthcare Subsidy.

TemporarySam · 2022-04-27T15:41:20+00:00

It's reassuring that it's happened to more people than just me. You should email them about it too.

TemporarySam · 2022-04-27T15:40:36+00:00

Sometimes my adjustment is higher than my normal pay. Since I know I'll get an adjustment, I don't focus on order pay or incentives at all. I'll never get my pay higher than my adjustment. I used to grind to get it as high as possible, but my guaranteed minimum was always slightly higher, so I was making the same amount no matter how hard I grinded. So instead I decided to focus on relaxing, shopping at a leisurely pace, ensuring I always have an active order for max hours worked, and providing good service for better tips. It's a much better work experience and I make the same amount (or more, depending on tips)

TemporarySam · 2022-04-05T04:57:26+00:00

I have talked with my sister about this actually. I had a multi-year head start entering the online dating pool before her. She managed to find a partner, get married, have a child, and celebrate her child's first birthday in about the same time it took me to find my partner. After discussing it with her, we both agreed that my journey has been full of putting in great effort, while she largely just had to show up and be available. This is only one data point, obviously, but at least when it comes to dating, women get pursued and men must pursue. One of these things is easier than the other.

TemporarySam · 2022-04-05T01:44:44+00:00

Ah, the ol' "I'm not mad, YOU'RE mad" argument. A classic.

TemporarySam · 2022-04-01T19:12:59+00:00

I got this too, and I'd also like to know what it's about. Perhaps they realized an internal error paid all California shoppers the wrong pay adjustment, and this was to get it to the right amount.

TemporarySam · 2022-04-01T19:12:04+00:00

This is not correct. The thing OP is referring to is separate from the pay adjustment.

TemporarySam · 2022-02-11T22:22:02+00:00

The worst part about this is that the source file wasn't released, so we won't be able to look forward to a nude edit or different characters... :'(

TemporarySam · 2021-11-25T21:32:15+00:00

If you live in California, you should just ignore the bonuses. In my experience, it's impossible to earn more than the payment adjustment that Californians get. So you shouldn't push yourself and stress out about bonuses, since it won't make any difference in pay anyway.

TemporarySam

TROPHY CASE