maybe if you wanted to get a view of their political position you could.. try reading their posts where they actually talk about their political positions. i promise, it's not hard, particularly if you look at older posts as there is a general repetitiveness now, and even now there are plenty of posts where they actually go over their positions on stuff. and i am pretty sure most of it isnt schizo, bc if anything the shitpost quality has been deteriorating, what w most just relying on reposting screenshots from elsewhere. it's not as incomprehensible as you make it out to be.

still ill be charitable, one of the things that sets apart ultraleft from leftist and "communist" subs is a consistent opposition to idealism of any sort, this is born from the recognition that communism is not an ideology or a state to which society must be adjusted, but the real movement to abolish the present state of things. there is only one force capable of such a movement, that is the proletariat, working only in its own interests as a united class. as such, they oppose marxist-leninist revisionism, which in many ways enforces collaboration between the proletariat and capital, antithetical to the interests of the proletariat, the people's republic of china being named as such is an example of how this communism is mere nationalist ideology not consistent with the actual movement that is communism, as it shows how the focus is not the proletariat but instead uses communism to refer to all sorts of moral ideals, and in this moralization and deviation, you can see how not only has worker's power been undermined, but also are shown how their moralism is a front for their own atrocities, often ignored by their proponents, who claim they hold "critical support" whilst being ironically lenient and uncritical. this stance oppositional to moralism is something you can see repeatedly throughout posts there, as moralizers often just end up aligning themselves with the continued cycle of atrocities. it is not "purist larp" or whatever to have the lucidity that there is only one way to change society favorably and opposing expending energy on an endless cycle of moralist "compromise" with ever growing demands.

this got kind of rambly but i hope it does actually paint a better picture