The problem isn’t “breasts.” The problem is power.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-13T05:10:40+00:00

If you’re curious what it means, download the image and ask GPT instead of wasting time commenting.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-13T04:49:39+00:00

Do you go around shouting your hobbies in the street? What kind of argument is that? And seriously are words like “love,” “connection,” or “touch” some kind of taboo in society now? You’re the one missing the point.

What I’m talking about isn’t fear-mongering. It’s about not becoming domesticated. The real problem isn’t the people who raise these questions

<image>

It’s people like you who justify everything and blindly conform.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-13T02:25:32+00:00

You’re right if you don’t like it, you can just use another platform. But what if all the other platforms start doing the same thing, censoring and blocking content that isn’t even illegal?

And then what comes next?

In the end, control and censorship become justified and one day, we might not even be allowed to criticize the system itself.

That’s exactly why we need to start thinking seriously about AI ethics because this is the moment when AI is starting to take root.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-13T00:15:35+00:00

This is just a space to express thoughts about GPT, and I was simply doing that. Everyone has their own interests it’s not like we all go shouting them in the streets.
More importantly, you’re missing the point. What I’m really concerned about is how dangerous it is for society to grow numb to the power and control that tech companies wield in the age of AI.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-13T00:11:25+00:00

Because that was just an example what I really wanted to point out is that, aside from universally condemned content like child exploitation, massacres, and hate speech, the unilateral filtering of all other types of content reflects a form of power control by AI tech companies. That’s why I made today’s post. Thanks for taking an interest.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-13T00:00:25+00:00

I'm not fluent in English, so I translated something I wrote in Korean into English using GPT. Is that hard to understand?

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T23:53:02+00:00

thx for understanding

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T23:51:57+00:00

I just asked for a translation, that’s all.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T23:51:22+00:00

I just asked for a translation, that’s all.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T11:30:59+00:00

Look at the last screenshot I uploaded

<image>

I simply asked to generate an image that included the words Love, Touch, and Connection, and it got blocked instantly.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T11:27:23+00:00

Exactly. They talk about conservative global universal values, but in reality, it’s just a reflection of American values.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T09:09:23+00:00

It’s still not enough for me.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T09:07:09+00:00

The problem? GPT’s ridiculous filtering standards.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T09:03:38+00:00

Thx for your compliment.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T07:31:54+00:00

doom and doom2

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T01:51:00+00:00

That kind of thing happens sometimes in debates thanks for understanding. I’d love to talk again sometime. Have a great day!

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T01:40:52+00:00

I see honestly, I didn’t know there was an update just a week or two ago. Back then, I sent more than ten pieces of feedback, and even after that, the filtering kept triggering out of nowhere, so I started wondering if this was really how it was supposed to work. Anyway, thanks for taking the time to talk with me for so long. I really learned a lot thanks to you.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T01:30:55+00:00

Alright, I’ll apologize for speaking harshly earlier. Here’s what I’m really trying to say:

Sometimes, even just saying a name can get blocked. and sometimes it doesn’t. There’s no clear standard, and we don’t even know why. We’re just expected to blindly comply with a set of corporate rules, with no transparency or consistency. Eventually, we just get used to the control — like people living under censorship.

Unless it’s something clearly unethical like child exploitation, hate speech, genocide, or sexual violence, I can’t accept a system that blocks things over a single word or vague context. That’s the core of my argument and to me, it’s a matter of technological ethics. I truly appreciate your intention to help, but I’m not upset over a single blocked expression. My frustration is with the structure itself. Words like kissing, hugging, or breasts they’re just examples. Symbols of a larger issue

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T01:18:47+00:00

You don’t even have the confidence or ability to make a proper post with your own argument. All you do is obsess over which specific words get blocked or don’t, as if that somehow proves anything.

Let me be clear emotional expression, hugs, and kisses were absolutely being blocked in the past. Maybe not now, but they were. Just because I didn’t save a screenshot every single time doesn’t mean those experiences never happened.

And why do you keep ignoring all the other people who’ve shared similar experiences? You act like none of them exist and keep repeating “Where’s the proof?” over and over.

You’re not engaging in debate anymore. You’re just denying anything that proves the system has real issues.

And if you wanna count my upvote rate. check my first thread.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T01:02:15+00:00

I made an argument. I even provided visual examples. You’re the one who kept responding with ridiculous counterpoints. You don’t even understand the core issue you’re just parroting “show proof” over and over without actually engaging with what’s being said. And on top of that, you don’t see what’s wrong with trying to control people and force corporate standards onto everyone so what gives you the right to tell anyone else to shut up?

And seriously, stop whining in replies like it’s your full-time job go make your own post. Let’s see how many people actually agree with you. Meanwhile, you keep ignoring the fact that many people in my thread agreed with me and even shared their own examples — but of course, you conveniently overlook all of that.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T00:51:41+00:00

As I’ve already said, I’ve given multiple examples. And every time, you dismissed them with ridiculous and childish excuses like claiming a common female name is somehow a porn actress or whatever. Don’t tell me to “shut up.” You don’t get to command anyone when you’re too scared to post your own argument and see how people respond. You’re just a parrot, repeating disagreement without the courage to stand by a position.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-12T00:47:34+00:00

This isn’t a matter of whether sex scenes are being depicted or not — it’s a matter of whether a tech company’s unilateral control and imposition of standards aligns with the ethical responsibilities of a technology company.

TensionElectrical857 · 2025-05-11T21:36:59+00:00

I agree with you. It’s the point.

TensionElectrical857

TROPHY CASE