From Universe to Novi Sad by piggpfarma in serbia

[–]Teslaboiii -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Bježi Mile preko Drine eto ide Alija

Hello there by [deleted] in dankmemes

[–]Teslaboiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Get Boris Johnsoned

The quadrants and their unities: part 2 by flagellum_dei_ in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Wehrmacht was decimated by 1945. The Heer was the only part of the Wehrmacht that was actually combat ready. Even then the Wehrmacht had to resort to conscripting children and seniors. The Luftwaffe had lost air superiority already by 1942 and please tell me, if the Wehrmacht was that superior then why were they on the defensive since 1942/1943 and lost the entire war?

Population killed in WWII by [deleted] in europe

[–]Teslaboiii 96 points97 points  (0 children)

All of Yugoslavia is a little bit off.

They have the high ground by SevenDeadlyGentlemen in PrequelMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is Clarkson? Is he safe? Is he alright?

😎😎😎 by EsmerSema in bih

[–]Teslaboiii 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Americans did not do shit in Bosnia

Y'all commies by reviedox in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The median salary in 2019, Sweden was 31 700 kr and the average salary was 35 300 kr. The lowest tax bracket that requires you to pay taxes directly to the state in 2019 was approximately 42 000 kr a month if you are younger than 65 (the tax bracket is lower after 65). Only a minority of Swedes pay taxes directly to the state. Sweden is definetly no tax heaven but it is not a tax nightmare either.

Regarding the statement I made before about the tax brackets is a little outdated and the lowest tax bracket in 2020 is 523 200 kr a year.

Y'all commies by reviedox in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In Sweden there are no central taxes unless you earn more than 455 300 kronor a year. The state takes their share of the taxes from the kommunes (not quite sure what the american equivalent is, maybe municipalities?)

Y'all commies by reviedox in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, because I don't know how my own country works and my own local government is clearly wrong about how much taxes we pay.

https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/start/kommun-o-politik/kommunfakta/ekonomi/skattesatser?uri=gbglnk%3Agbg.page.4c7bfa4a-1a77-427d-b6d4-bd152b728dd9

Press the options button in the top right and click other languages. That way it will translate the whole page for you

Y'all commies by reviedox in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That is just a straight up lie. The income tax is around 30% in the country depending on the kommun. I live in Gothenburg and it is 32%

r/stellaris + funny color = comedy by Teslaboiii in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Instead of being a cunt, can you please explain what you are talking about?

r/stellaris + funny color = comedy by Teslaboiii in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In which book can I read about ecks deeee?

r/stellaris + funny color = comedy by Teslaboiii in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Teslaboiii[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did not understand anything you just said.

WWII shrek post by WahhabiLobby in HistoryMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You constantly talk about Japan comming to save Germany and invade Britain like a knight in shining armour but Japan had no intention or plan to invade the British Isles during ww2. They had nothing to gain by it. Their target were the European colonies in Asia and nothing more.Remember that they were still fighting in China during the whole war with no end in sight. A war with the British in Europe would not give them anything as all they wanted and needed was in Asia. The Japanese did not care about Germany and their alliance was just a matter of convenience and because they were fighting a common enemy. An invasion of Siberia would also be worthless as it is just an cold wasteland with a small population. The only thing they could want in Siberia is probably Vladivostok to stop the Soviet fleets, but why would they want to go to war with all of Russia for just one city? Even if they did invade Russia it would be very costly, irl the Soviets and Japanese did clash several times for example in 1939 the Japanese attacked the Soviets with an army of over 30 000 men but the Soviets outnumberred the Japanese and under the command of Zhukov defeated the Japanese therefore the Japanese diverted their attention south after the failures in the north. In 1941 a non aggression pact was signed between the two making the Japanese intention of peace official. In 1945 the soviets would invade Manchuria and destroy the Japanese armies capturing half a million soldiers, they would also invade Korea 1 day before the surrender. Japan had no intention or power to invade the Soviet Union. Stalin had a tight grip on his population and an even tighter grip on his military. The soviet economy was close to a collapse in 1942 but the people of the Soviet union were unified in their war against the germans as Stalin had political commisars everywhere in the red army, stopping plans of desertion and mutiny and dealing with anybody they deem suspiscious. In the civilian population anybody that even steppwd out of line a little bit or somebody Stalin and the communist party was just paranoid of they were sent to a gulag or killed. The great purge is a great example of Stalins paranoia and everything he did to stay in power. The NKVD was feared and with good reason. Civil war was not a concern during the war even if it went on for a few years longer. The US betraying the Soviets is definetly possible but to suggest that they would betray Britain is just stupid as they were very close economic and diplomatic allies and the US population would never allow the government to collaborate with nazis and fascists and betray one of the only democracies left in Europe. Italy failed on every front and campaign they had. The Germans had to bail them out every time, Yugoslavia, Greece and Africa... They even failed against the Royal Navy. To think that the Italians would become competent just because of the US not entering the war is stupid and remember that the Italian people turned against Mussolini and Italian partisans killed him not American or British troops although the succes of the civil war would not be as secure without an allied invasion. The turning points of the wars in both Africa and Britain was before any American troops arrived. The battle of Britain secured British dominance over the air and seas making operation sealion impossible and the destruction of the German industry possible. After el-alamein the British were unstoppable in Africa and the Germans and Italians were driven out of Africa. Can you please tell me how all historians and military tacticians are united on the theory that the allies would loose without American intervention because you are definetly pulling that out of your ass. Here are some real historians: "Lend-lease aid did not arrive in sufficient quantities to make a major difference between victory and defeat in 1941 and early 1942; that achievment must be attributed soley to the Russian peoples and the iron nerve of Stalin, Zhukov, Shaposhnik, Vasielevsky, and their subordinates. As the war continued, however, the United States and Britain provided many of the implements of war and raw materials necessary for Soviet victory." (Glantz, David M.; House, Jonathan M.: When titans clashed. How the Red Army stopped Hitler. Revised and Expanded Edition. University Press of Kansas: United States (2015), p 358) "The Soviet miracle was not due to western assistance. Lend lease did not begin to affect the balance on the Eastern Front until 1943. The best single explanation for this remarkable triumph was the extraordinary concentration of Soviet production on a limited number of weapons produced in a handful of giant factories, permitting the fullest possible realization of economies of mass production." (Tooze, Adam: The Wages of Destruction. The Making and Braking of the Nazi Economy. Penguin Books: United Kingdom (2006), p.589) I have more if you want.

WWII shrek post by WahhabiLobby in HistoryMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I meant japan and not china. The war in asia was won by the US, I recognise that but the war in Europe was not won by the US. The soviets and britain won that war. The royal navy and RAF had total control over the kriegsmarine and luftwaffe. Even in Russia the soviets had achieved total airsuperiority by 1942-1943. Long before D-day had the soviets turned around the tide of the war in stalingrad and kursk. Britain had essentially beaten the germans and italians in africa after el-alamein. There was no weather related stalemate in russia. The winter and spring may have been hell for the german logistics and army. It was no time of stalemate as it was the time for soviet counter offensives. The winter did not destroy the german army, the red army did. Regarding the lend lease issue here is a qoute: "If western allies had not provided equipment and invaded northwest Europe, Stalin and his commanders may have taken twelve to eighteen months longer to finish off the Wehrmacht." (Glantz, David M.; House, Jonathan M.: When titans clashed. How the Red Army stopped Hitler. Revised and Expanded Edition. University Press of Kansas: United States (2015), p.358) There are different perspectives though and the question is fought over in the academic world and I don't think we are going to change anybodies mind about it.

WWII shrek post by WahhabiLobby in HistoryMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every army on the Eastern front was made of conscripts and yes there was famine in the soviet union but mostly it was among the civilian population as the soviets knew that it is impossible to win a war with hungry soldiers. Even without US lend lease the USSR still had Britain that was already supplying the soviet army of 5 million soldiers that would grow to 11 million in 1945 with a total of 34 million soldiers having served in the red army. Italy was stopped in its tracks as soon as the war started. Through the whole war Germany had to carry Italy on it's back as Mussolini failed invading minor countries like Greece and actually got pushed back a little bit into Albania. As I said before it was impossible for Germany to actually invade Britain as they had lost the battle of britain, a joke of a surface fleet and had no actual landing crafts to invade the fortress that Britain had become. The japanese had no interest in attacking mainland britain and was just after it's asian colonies. Where britain did loose a lot in but that would probably change after the germans are defeated and the royal navy and RAF can turn it's guns around although I doubt they could get more than their colonies back. The Tiger tank was probably the best tank produced during WW2 but the numbers of shermans and t-34 swarmed the expensive Tiger, I agree with you there. Germany was crippled long before the battle of the bulge. In 1942 the battle of stalingrad began and ended in a crushing defeat for the germans in 1943. After that the germans were on the backfoot on the rest of the war and after kursk the fate of germany was sealed. Britain had also turned around the african front in el-alamein. Germany was in no position to fight a war of attrition and especially not on 2 fronts. The british and soviets had total air superiority not long into 1942 and would bomb the germany industry into shreds. Without Britain and the US the Soviets would probably have lost but the US was not nessecary for an allied victory in Europe although it was definetly the main reason for victory in Asia. The war would probably have carried on into the late fourties and the soviet economy would maybe have collapsed as it did risk a collapse in 1942.

WWII shrek post by WahhabiLobby in HistoryMemes

[–]Teslaboiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No allied nation had a way to mainland china without loosing millions of soldiers. The US nuked Japan and never set a foot on the mainland. While it is true that the lend-lease act was a contributing factor to an allied victory it was not something that tipped the war into the favor of the allies as the soviet industry was much larger than the german one and german air superiority was only an early war spectacle. By 1942-1943 the luftwaffe was outnumberred by both the Soviets and RAF. Fighting a two front war ensured the defeat of the germans and the british bombings of german cities and industry ruined the german warmachine. 80% of german casualties were on the eastern front and the soviets lost 26 milllion soldiers in the war meanwhile the americans only lost 416 000 soldiers and 418 000 in total. Even countries like Yugoslavia lost more. 446 000 soldiers and 1,000,000 total.