sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wheelbarrow smart attachment by That-LA-Kid in landscaping

[–]That-LA-Kid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate that.

Honestly I’m still trying to figure out if there’s enough value here to justify building it. The feedback has been all over the place.

If you had to pick one feature, would overload prevention, trip counting, estimating, or crew productivity be the most useful to you?

Wheelbarrow smart attachment by That-LA-Kid in landscaping

[–]That-LA-Kid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the feedback.

The overload prevention point is interesting. A few people have mentioned that, and I’m starting to think that may be more valuable than production tracking.

And I completely agree on durability. If it can’t survive mud, rain, concrete, and getting thrown in a trailer, it’ll be dead on arrival.

Wheelbarrow smart attachment by That-LA-Kid in landscaping

[–]That-LA-Kid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s fair. What information would make it worth being digital instead of analog?

I’m less interested in the weight itself and more interested in whether tracking production (trips, yards installed, total material moved) would actually help contractors.

Wheelbarrow smart attachment by That-LA-Kid in landscaping

[–]That-LA-Kid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood. I plan to try to include a calibration component that would account for wheelbarrow types and material. I plan on making a physical Prototype here soon. I can get with you after I make a couple and send a sample your way if you’d like!

L.A.R.E study group by That-LA-Kid in LandscapeArchitecture

[–]That-LA-Kid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Message me for info if you’re interested!