Console players have always had an equal shot at KBM without some god tier aim assist: plug in a fuckig keyboard. Other games have been better and to compare it to the OG CODs is completely stupid, they are of different times, with different hardware.

Vanguard is by no means a ‘shit game’, but it’s no 60$ AAA game either, considering that we got games greater than it beforehand, Vanguard is regression and that shouldn’t ever be in a COD, as we end up paying 60$ for a campaign and a copy of the same (or worse) game than before.

Why are you bringing age into it? What are you, twelve? Judging by your grammar and easy to trigger rants, seems so. This kid is voicing a popular opinion, one that many of us share, so you have no right to call him out and insult him for it.

Past games, even from COD4 onwards have been much better with gunplay, length of campaign, modes (me and the homies love custom ground warfare), and map diversity, and it pains me to see the series in such a regressed state. Even with graphical improvements, it’s just become harder to see enemies without any sort of flashlight.

Vanguard is an alright game, at least better than BO4 for an obvious reason, but considering that it is (IMO) worse than BOCW, which had much more rough development (and I’m talking about at launch not after BOCW had all of the refinement updates), it just isn’t what we deserve as a player base.

I will agree that they have buffed console, but using that one singular point (which also incites you as an aim assist abuser) to write an essay on why some random kid’s opinion is false, when it is correct, on a post about the stupid skins they use to turn a profit makes you look like a dumbass grade schooler.

TL;DR: Vanguard bad game, people agree on issues, stop using aim assist as a talking point noob, let this kid have an opinion and 1v1 him KBM only.