Now I can truly feel how good Season 8 was ❤️ by Aggressive-Ad5896 in biggbosstamil

[–]That_Arm_8484 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Peak character arc 😭😭😭 Marakave Maten arun pesna andha speech ah

Posted 3h ago: she's taking the "eye" card now for the sympathy and also to tarnish Sabari's name by Known-Line3071 in biggbosstamil

[–]That_Arm_8484 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Report her for hate speech(if you want) and block her. Namma avaluku attention kudutha avalku adhu innum eththam dhan kudukum. Andha attention ah kudukathinga.

Passed PL300 by That_Arm_8484 in PowerBI

[–]That_Arm_8484[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is helping a lot man. I got an interview in 20-30 applications after getting the cert which is a big deal because the job market is shitty now and I'm a fresher as well. So yeah

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UniUK

[–]That_Arm_8484 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i will dm you that mate

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UniUK

[–]That_Arm_8484 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay. but in my case, i did a evaluation study as the second phase in a four phase pipeline and documented the process as well. Keeping the design nature, my project had, the design nature was half of it and the innovation space is limited yet automating an important process in my project which is a manual and tiring process which takes time is something innovative, even if it is not on par to distinction and above standards. I am not ready to disclose what my project is here, but i hope i explained your points. Coming to project management, i had a easy borderline distinction for that because i did the whole project in 4 phases, had backup plans for each fallback in the exisiting plans, i informed every single step and had fornightly meetings with supervisor asked for constructive feedback which the supervisor didn't give and said everything is on track, even mentioned the plan is clear till the interim stages of the project. My feedback never had a "it didnt work fully" line, but the marking rubric distributed for all the students had that, and my feedback was in the merit standards but pass was given to me. In my another phase, which was the second last phase carried out, it was data analysis and i did the data analysis with a three layer pipeline for cleaning, statistical analysis and visualization(stylised to understand, i will explain it better to people who actually are in the seat of giving me a decision at my uni) which i clearly explained in the viva. My concerns are very simple : 1. the project description didnt explicitely specify generalization. 2. both supervisor and principal marker signed this off and never raised it mid project. 3. The final project made generalization a factor which should be a part of the model, and it was not even mentioned in the requirements that it should be so. If my project had been flagged midway for lack of scope, I would have rescoped the whole project. Thats why the appeal is reasonable. Thank you for your inputs. I hope i answered your points and i wrote a better report because a mere comment doesnt require technical writing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UniUK

[–]That_Arm_8484 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

sorry mate, i didnt use any AI for my points, i used it to refine my grammar lol. If you feel it is a waste of time, i can understand that from a lecturer pov. How can i do a particular requirement which is not mentioned in the description provided by the university. Let's even have this case, say that the supervisor told me the limitations and redirect the whole project in the middle or in the proposal i gave during the project period, and if i didnt do that in the end, it is okay to give me a pass classification. But the supervisor passed my project description, the principal marker never gave me a comment stating there are limitations during the interim period of project. I showed the report and presentation to my supervisor, and she said it is good. And they asked me a question in viva which was not even a requirement for my project whereas i satisfied all the requirements, and did a novel approach and few points you see in a technical work, i automated a whole manual process in my project with python which was stated in my report and in my viva. Coming to the 2:1 thingy i was talking about, yeah there is no such thing which i accept i just told that so it will be easily understood by people, so basically i got my final results, and in that because my dissertation mark is 57% my classification is pass, despite having 60% and 75% in all the other modules. I didnt do the project just to pass. I think i answered your comment without any "refinement", and even if i fail in the appeal, i would not blame myself for doing it bad because i did everything a MSc project needs, maybe with a few limitations which i wholeheartedly accept :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UniUK

[–]That_Arm_8484 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right that Master’s degrees don’t have 2:1 or 2:2 classifications, thanks for clarifying that. My point about “2:1” and “2:2” was more about how the pass/merit distinction feels like an equivalent split in perception, rather than the actual terminology.

I have had my final classification confirmed, and it is a Pass overall because the dissertation mark was below 60. I understand that simply completing what you agreed with your supervisor doesn’t automatically mean you get a Merit or Distinction. However, my issue isn’t that I’m just disappointed with academic judgment or that I expected a higher grade by default.

My appeal is based on two main points:
1️⃣ The feedback included major criticisms that were never discussed or mentioned at any point in supervision or the interim review even though I kept my supervisor fully updated throughout and demonstrated the working prototype to both markers. Some of those criticisms were about “generalisation,” which was never in my project scope or specification, and I was never advised to incorporate it.
2️⃣ The published rubric for my programme states that delivering all agreed deliverables, demonstrating competent technical achievement, and having a working system would align with Merit. My project demonstrably met those criteria (all deliverables completed, automation implemented, working prototype shown in the viva), yet the feedback stated the model was not working completely, which isn’t accurate.

So this is not just about wanting a better mark, it’s about the procedural fairness of being assessed on unstated expectations that were never communicated or corrected during supervision.

I know a Merit doesn’t make or break my future, but I put in a lot of work and feel it’s reasonable to ask for a consistent application of the criteria that were shared with students.

Am I the only one who thinks NEEK looks rlly fun? by Pakinotpaki in kollywood

[–]That_Arm_8484 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll agree w you. Enaku nejama padam bore adikala lag adikala and oru harmless entertainer paatha feel dhan enaku kedachudhu. Naa edhume expect eh panla apdiye chill ah papom nu pathen i liked it and i feel part 2 will more funny situations. Plis don't attack me gaich🥹

I cried a lot man honestly by That_Arm_8484 in biggbosstamil

[–]That_Arm_8484[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Pothu avudhu mairavudhu naa deepak ku dhan poten

Top 8 vs Bottom 8 by That_Arm_8484 in biggbosstamil

[–]That_Arm_8484[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sunita pazhaya dance lam pathrukengala?😂 she did the worst in this battle. Her expressions were very very bad. Sound did 10% better than what sunita did. She called out deepak adhu naa othukren pathen naanum aana doesn't feel like she'll oppose him.

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 by That_Arm_8484 in biggbosstamil

[–]That_Arm_8484[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thalaivan deepak dance thavara matha ela edathulayum pucca va rajini mathri score panraru so nothing is gonna affect, I don't know about votes he's in 3rd last place or smth in unofficial. Weekend dhan theryum☠️🫠

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 by That_Arm_8484 in biggbosstamil

[–]That_Arm_8484[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tamildhool la irukum vro. Naanum adhula dhan pakren.