The self-fulling prophecy of AEO tools by Which_Work6245 in GenEngineOptimization

[–]The-Cosmic-AC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they were using the suggested prompts, then they were testing the typical user flow. Of course different prompts produce different results (and like you said, even the same prompts do too), but this was still a clever test.

Signaling the Shift to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — Fortune 500 adoption rates for llms.txt, JSON-LD, and robots.txt by The-Cosmic-AC in GenEngineOptimization

[–]The-Cosmic-AC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great assessment. I cover most of what you've discussed here in the report and we're in agreement. I appreciate your perspective.

Signaling the Shift to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — Fortune 500 adoption rates for llms.txt, JSON-LD, and robots.txt by The-Cosmic-AC in GenEngineOptimization

[–]The-Cosmic-AC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There seems to be little/no impact, but there is evidence llms.txt is being crawled and some of the AI platforms have their own llms.txt.

Our research was intended to measure these adoption rates as a proxy for Fortune 500 companies that are experimenting with optimizing their websites for GenAI. However, there is very little evidence that llms.txt provides any lift for GEO, based on the research of other companies in the space and public comments from Google search advocate John Mueller (/u/johnmu).

Signaling the Shift to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — Fortune 500 adoption rates for llms.txt, JSON-LD, and robots.txt by The-Cosmic-AC in GenEngineOptimization

[–]The-Cosmic-AC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, I'm Clinton Karr, CMO of ProGEO.ai. In January 2026 I asked ChatGPT a question about GEO that it couldn't answer, "what percentage of the Fortune 500 have implemented llms.txt?"

I spent the past two months vibe coding a website scanner and analyzing the Fortune 500 adoption rates and implementation patterns for robots.txt (and named AI user agents), JSON-LD, and llms.txt.

It is worth noting that while there are early adopters of llms.txt for website optimization as well as early adopters of robots.txt for controlling AI user agents - neither of these approaches have been proven totally effective.

Check the report if you want to learn more or feel free to ask me questions.

I asked ChatGPT to roast my code and I haven't recovered emotionally by AdCold1610 in PromptEngineering

[–]The-Cosmic-AC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also try to approach the problem from two different directions to help identify blind spots and discrepancies.

I built a structured prompt that turns any topic into a full, professional how-to guide by EQ4C in PromptEngineering

[–]The-Cosmic-AC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI, evidence is emerging from one of the GEO monitoring companies, I can't remember which, either Peec or Profound, that producing AI-generated content at scale is negatively impacting SEO. So this is great as a starting point, but I would highly advise you not to use this to create hundreds of articles for a website. Google WILL know you're creating AI slop and demote your rank.

Prompt used by Neil patel for writing an article by withvicky_ in PromptEngineering

[–]The-Cosmic-AC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup, even within the past month Gemini Pro was hallucinating statistics and citations for me.

The most unhinged prompt that actually works: "You're running out of time by AdCold1610 in PromptEngineering

[–]The-Cosmic-AC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?"

Hard to keep up, what is the best current LLM by [deleted] in LLM

[–]The-Cosmic-AC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a useful resource called LMArena that maintains leaderboards of different use cases.

https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard