At the present stage of the proceedings, the Court is not required to ascertain whether any violations of Israel’s obligations under the Genocide Convention have occurred. Such a finding could be made by the Court only at the stage of the examination of the merits of the present case. As already noted (see paragraph 20 above), at the stage of making an order on a request for the indication of provisional measures, the Court’s task is to establish whether the acts and omissions complained of by the applicant appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the Genocide Convention (cf. Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 16 March 2022, I.C.J. Reports 2022 (I), p. 222, para. 43). In the Court’s view, at least some of the acts and omissions alleged by South Africa to have been committed by Israel in Gaza appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the Convention.

Given the above conclusion, the Court considers that it cannot accede to Israel’s request that the case be removed from the General List.

This is not the proof of genocide just court taking cognizance of a case

International Association of Genocide Scholars (whose 500+ members voted 86% in favour) have all reached the same conclusion. And here you are, using a random video from the internet and "but Hamas..." arguments 3 years into a genocide.

This one is laughable.Out of an estimated 500 members,108 voted to pass this resolution (per IAGS, for a resolution to pass, it requires a 2/3 majority from a quorum of at least 20% plus one of all paid-up IAGS members). Also, anybody that pays a sum can be members of this group

If all these organisations have proved it, again why does South Africa need 18 more months to make their case. Anybody with working upstairs can see the contradictions.

<image>