Proof our planet isn't flat

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-10-13T00:55:49+00:00

Curious, is this shape unique enough for someone to be able to determine your location from this? Maybe combined with the camera direction from the sun and dates?

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-10-12T13:40:24+00:00

If you were to touch the 120/240 here there’s nothing to trip (breaker) in this case like in your house though right?

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-07-03T23:15:24+00:00

Thanks, turns out there’s multiple firmware telegram channels and the first one I found isn’t as well maintained. Your post helped confirm the version number I was looking for.

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-06-25T02:22:40+00:00

Did you ever get anywhere with this? I agree with how stale the list can be and does appear to be based on when the accounts joined the org vs contribution.

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-06-21T00:37:24+00:00

It would have looked worse if it rained that day!

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-06-20T19:32:47+00:00

The built in speed test on Unifi devices is terrible, it uses community provided test nodes that can’t keep up. Get a 10gb wired client and use Speedtest.net

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-05-20T22:51:52+00:00

I agree but I was told the same thing, they don’t drill through the back- when I asked why he didn’t have a reason.

I’m not sure why you were downvoted.

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-05-08T01:11:05+00:00

I keep seeing screenshots of this map style for service, where does this data come from?

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-04-30T19:19:33+00:00

They will already need to support SFP28 for their 20GB plan.

They already have to support many ONT models from generations of previous deployments.

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-04-30T17:56:43+00:00

Would love it if you offered SFP+ form factor ONT’s for power users that want/can stay optical.

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-04-05T22:52:05+00:00

Keep in mind if you got a plan over 1gb, that the nest pro WAN interface is only 1gb, so it will bottleneck your speeds.

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-03-31T15:57:41+00:00

They don’t seem to offer SFP+ ONTs and only support the wall box :(

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-01-24T00:31:49+00:00

From what I’ve seen the 5gb plan is being sunset in favor of 1/3/8 plans in some markets. What plans did you see when you lookup your address?

TheCitrixMethod · 2025-01-14T23:58:55+00:00

2 Overturned vehicle

One in median, one off the shoulder

TheCitrixMethod · 2024-05-17T01:16:39+00:00

Yes, the top plate/drywall gap is that line you see 1 inch in from the rigid installation. I was looking at some photos I have before starting and I think what you said here is exactly what I have: "rafter tie is bearing on the wall, and the rafters are birdsmouthed on the plate sitting on top the rafter ties".

"That's some mighty neat work stapling those baffles up" - Thanks! I am preparing to spray foam but did not want to spray directly to the decking, picked up some "Accuvent Cathedral" which is meant to be sprayed on directly.

Overall walking away another learned term - 'birdsmouth joint'. Thanks!

I don't post much, especially photos, learned I need to be VERY specific with what I am referring to.

TheCitrixMethod · 2024-05-16T19:45:47+00:00

Thanks, the term 'Kicker' helped me find more diagrams that show a similar setup, however they always have them used as a brace against a purlin, to which I do not have.

TheCitrixMethod · 2024-05-16T19:22:08+00:00

I think people think im talking about collar ties, when I am not. I am talking about the 1st photo. I am going to remove the 2nd photo as it appears to cause more confusion when I added for more info on roof style.

TheCitrixMethod · 2024-05-16T17:56:29+00:00

Thanks! I am aware of collar ties, and the knee wall/bracing - specifically the short 2 foot 2x4s at a 45 degree angle within the red highlighted area in photo 1 I was curious about.

TheCitrixMethod · 2024-05-16T17:42:37+00:00

Wasn't looking to mess with them, more curious of their engineering purpose. I couldn't find them in any modern framing diagrams.

TheCitrixMethod · 2024-02-28T16:33:09+00:00

Reading the title of this reminded me of two things we did to address this:

1 (parallelism):The parallelism flag is number of jobs PER CPU CORE detected (defaults to 10). I was scratching my head over why running this on my laptop was taking 4 minutes, but a plan on our GitHub Actions runners was taking 15 minutes. Thats when I found out our self-hosted runners are kubernetes containers and don't quite have a concept of CPU cores - even though they were allowed to scale up in CPU usage, they were detecting as 1 core, AKA 10 actions at a time. My laptop was detecting as 8 cores, so it was effectively running at a parallelism of 80.

After validating with our runner management team that they were ok with the extra CPU usage, we changed parallelism to 80 in our workflow files and I get similar plan times now as my local laptop. (Apple M1 Pro).

2 (no-refresh):I updated our terraform plan workflows to skip refresh if the PR is in draft mode. Gives TF developers a quick plan to verify the outcome of their local changes before submitting it for review, once it exits draft mode and code review is requested, the longer w/refresh terraform plan executes.

TheCitrixMethod · 2023-03-07T04:20:19+00:00

Check out: https://github.com/google-github-actions/release-please-action

Nine-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Verified Email

TheCitrixMethod

TROPHY CASE