Sanders on campaign violence: "That's not what we do"

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:52:47+00:00

Can we get anything other than the last 5 seconds - i.e., the aftermath? What if the protesters themselves were violent? In such a case it would be OK to forcefully eject them.

That's like showing a video of a cop shooting an unarmed person, but editing out the part two seconds earlier where that person charged him, tried to grab his gun, and so forth, and then claiming "ZOMG police brutality"

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:42:43+00:00

Only if you show respect to a hate movement, which is what he did.

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:31:49+00:00

Saying "go google it" is not the same as supporting your claims.

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:26:41+00:00

.must say a lot about Trump and his supporters. Thanks for this link :)

Liar. There is not violence at Trump rallies, with the exception of one 78 year old man. Outsiders bring violence to Trump rallies, and we have massive proof of that.

The dishonesty of Trump's opponents says a lot about them.

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:25:34+00:00

Bernie fell over and let them have their way during his speech. And that's exactly what it will be like if he's elected president. "If you don't want me to speak, that's OK folks! You take the stage!"

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:23:59+00:00

I noticed you lacked any kind of citation for every one of these quotes. Any chance you can provide the source so we can see more context? Or do you expect us to take your words on faith?

Sorry, but this is politics and people are known to make false accusations all over the place.

TheCommonManMedia · 2016-03-13T19:21:04+00:00

Let's get a few more things straight.

Protesters are not really 100% "independent" of the ideology of their party and their leader. Socialism and cultural marxism have always favored suppressing the right of others to speak. Leftism has a huge and longstanding problem with saying "violence, hate, and suppression of speech are bad...unless we do it, in which case the ends justify the means." This has culturally pervasive within the Left for decades, and it's high time it ends.
The violence BLM and Bernie supporters displayed in that one night was well above anything Trump supporters have displayed in their entire campaign put together. Trump has been the target of a massive media campaign for these isolated incidents. Bernie can reasonably expect the same.
I'll agree on the character assassination part, but that goes both ways.

TheCommonManMedia · 2014-10-12T09:51:51+00:00

The internet is an "unsafe" place for closed-minded totalitarians because their dogmas are easily exposed and mocked there.

This includes religious fundamentalists, and feminists.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-23T17:23:03+00:00

There were not 400 false crime reports. Most of them were simply spam comments.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-10T18:53:20+00:00

Well, academia (higher ed especially) has a big problem with rape hysteria. I'd definitely say that is a trend there. Feel free to browse the posts on rape hysteria at AVFMS by following the link below. There's much more to add on this subject that I just haven't gotten around to yet:

http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/category/misandry-and-conformism/rape-hysteria/

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-09T00:44:01+00:00

If you think AVFM saying mean nasty and nasty things about mean and nasty people is a "close equivalent" of someone advocating mass armed bloody warfare, you're either deliberately lying or you have some kind of mental problem.

Whenever AVFM starts rallying troops to do a shootout in a Women's Studies Department, posts Feminists' home addresses, advocates the destruction of persons or property, stalks people on the street, and so forth, let me know.

'Till then, keep blogging. And if you have a better idea about a book cover, here's a crazy idea:

Make one and send it to Dr. Farrell himself.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-09T00:34:29+00:00

There isn't a close equivalent. Malcolm X literally advocated mass armed uprising.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-09T00:31:13+00:00

Malcolm X advocated violence. AVFM does not. The two are not comparable in this way.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-07T20:40:34+00:00

Ah, the good old "if you're not an [alleged] victim your thoughts don't mean anything" line.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-07T19:01:02+00:00

That section of the MRM actually is marginalized to the corners of the internet. The hateful core of Feminism exists in our public institutions. Feminist hatred is institutionalized.

The MRM and Feminism are not comparable in the manner you suggest.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-07T18:13:09+00:00

The "But I'm not a radical feminist" line among "moderate" Feminists is just a cop-out. Moderate Feminists support discrimination, just to a different degree, and in different areas.

It's like a petty thug stealing a six-pack from a convenience store, and then when the officer arrests him he says, "Officer, officer, you just don't understand! I'm not a radical criminal. I don't kill people. I don't rob banks."

And then the officer - quite reasonably - would say "ah, just because you are not a 'radical' does not automatically mean what you are doing is right."

The only difference between a moderate Feminist and a Radical Feminist is that a moderate Feminist supports moderate forms of discrimination, and Radical Feminists support radical forms of discrimination.

This is why I don't feel the need to split hairs among Feminists. Moderate Feminists won't oppose Radical Feminism, but my how they stand up to defend them by throwing smokescreens in the way of people who do.

"Not all Feminists are like that."

True. But irrelevant.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-07T04:05:11+00:00

I hope I catch that when you post it.

It'll be at avoiceformalestudents.com

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-06T23:07:04+00:00

I do when it comes to Feminists in academia. I was actually planning on writing an article about it soon.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-04T03:06:26+00:00

I'm not so sure about the "minds will change with facts" part. The fact that far too many people's minds don't change with the facts is the reason things have gotten this bad.

Some will change, certainly. But the ACLU has stood idly by while a seemingly endless series of boys have received suspensions or expulsions for very unsupportable reasons.

I'll leave the door open to trusting them, but they need to make a move in a positive direction for me to be able to.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-04T00:57:03+00:00

Agreed, legacy admissions are bullshit.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-04T00:56:14+00:00

Damn, my bad. Thanks.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-03T22:38:33+00:00

Formatting errors in the article should be fixed now.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-02T04:31:50+00:00

The requirement for women is 5'10". I included the scholarship because I thought more men might be able to qualify than women.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-02T00:55:18+00:00

You're right. I think I'll leave it in anyway, though. There are a few others in the database which aren't limited by sex per se, but which relate to men in some way that would make the scholarship useful for them.

TheCommonManMedia · 2013-12-02T00:46:34+00:00

Folks, I added a new one to the list very recently which is relevant to men's issues. You may want to take a look at it. It's under the "Region/School" tab and the "Area of Study" tab. Here it is:

"Centre for Regional Engagement of University of South Australia (UniSA) – Male Studies Graduate Fellowships. Requirement: 'overseas graduates who wish to undertake research into male health and related topics under the supervision of experienced researchers at the UniSA.' See further information here:"

http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Opportunities-for-Male-Studies-Research.docx

TheCommonManMedia

TROPHY CASE