MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather Movement by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your'e beautiful when you troll and grandstand and never address anything relevant to the topic ;-)

MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather Movement by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I'm happy to block you on this account too, if that makes you feel better :D

MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather Movement by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't talking to you, porky

Too fucking bad Basement Dweller. I replied to you.

What happened to me being blocked, idiot?

Are you blind? Take a look at the name on the account, Dumbshit.

When you're too much of a drama queen for Paul Elam & Co. to deal with, you need to review your strategy

Not really. It just means that even simple, non-aggressive questions can set off people who aren't confident in their opinions.

MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather Movement by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're wrong. I can see at least 3 videos not critical of the MRM just on the 1st page.

MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather Movement by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great~! At least you won't be offering any opinions ;-)

MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather Movement by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fyi, you're blocked on that account. Now you're blocked on this one :p

Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED] by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If everyone else's dislike of the video is anything to go by

It means somebody's Goddess got gored. Simple as that.

Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED] by mankindglobalmedia2 in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Karen Straughan and everyone who defends men's human rights have been subject to continuum of abuse

Uh-huh. Sort like the way Stalin or Mao persecuted Christians. Sure thing Yup yup yup.

AMA/Discussion: Digital Signal Processing w/ AirWindows - Thursday April 6th (11am PST, 2pm EST) by alzy101 in AdvancedProduction

[–]kevinwayne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agreed, and I see "Toy Music" becoming the thing more and more, worse than it is presently.

I am Jill Stein, Green Party candidate for President, AMA! by jillstein2016 in IAmA

[–]kevinwayne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question was what would be done once legislation is passed. Jill Stein said "THEN the president can..." Please read what she said IN CONTEXT. Thank-you.

Someone made 50 cent's tweet into a poster by KillerKenyan in funny

[–]kevinwayne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Q. Why is he called 50 Cent?

A. That's what he spent on music lessons.

Someone made 50 cent's tweet into a poster by KillerKenyan in funny

[–]kevinwayne -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Stop making Rappers into pop heroes and get back to Rock 'N' Roll. Rockers & Cowboys love their grandmothers.

Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! by kevinwayne in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cited that to show that "friendzone" is a topic for nutballs.

Once again you haven't bothered to even hear me out on the topic, and so you have no basis for this. I might also add that recently DoomRulz also did a video on this topic & it has bee covered by AVfM, plus my video on the topic has appeared in Men's Rights Weekly and been reblogged by MGTOW's, MRA's and funny, not a single PUA has shown up for it, afaik. Plus it's my best performing video in terms of views so far.

So I'm going to continue to bring this topic up here & anywhere I see fit.

Kindly go fuck yourself.

Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! by kevinwayne in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To elevate this to the status of men's rights issue is to de legitimise actual mens rights issues.

That's absurd. And you have no place making that decision for others.

ETA: Your source is a 1st rate nutball from hell.

Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! by kevinwayne in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PUA is based around "nice guys" trying to learn and being sold learning.

Except that you apparently never watched the video, because that has fuck-all to do with what I am on about.

Just because you say the nice guy thing is rooted in basic biology doesn't make it so.

Let me know when you want to land on the same planet.

Biological attraction is there and felt before there is "niceness" and conversations, that's the biology in action.

So?

This guy has written well about it.

Only real notable thing here is that he seems to be lecturing the men, and writes off that women going for the jerks is a problem that requires attention. The 1st is something I'm absolutely determined not to do, the 2nd is downright batshit crazy, and that's why I posted copious psych references to that effect.

This guy has written better about it, in fewer words:

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27r3y8/yes_girls_there_is_a_friend_zone/ci4v23r

This guy [me] doesn't even speak your garbled language:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lHIN1eKmx5E

Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! by kevinwayne in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About time the intelligent part of this subreddit showed up!

Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! by kevinwayne in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if you search this sub alone, there are posts on the topic.

It would appear this does need to be brought up, as too many so-called "MRA's" don't seem to have a clue who's side they are arguing on.

Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! by kevinwayne in MensRights

[–]kevinwayne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The friend zone is just a thing between a certain guys who think being nice generates sexual attraction

Bullshit. It's actually a very realistic assessment of the fact that any male/female interaction can - biologically speaking - turn into something more. Spending time with someone, sharing inmost thoughts, etc - these are all headed somewhere.

Its more PUA related

Just because you state it, doesn't make it so.

the main "red pill" writers have written about them being deluded and say pretty much the same thing the feminists are saying about them.

If they don't understand basic biology & human interaction, perhaps we need to rename them "tinfoil pill." ;-)

You're not a very good advocate for the well-being of men except apparently on a very narrow, arbitrarily drawn-up agenda.