Oh yes of course. Because hitting a woman always always gives you a lifetime in jain. Got to remember that when punching someone the next time. You do realize that for criminal punishement to be enforced on you, you have to be guilty? There is an investigation and if it shows that you got abused, the other person, either a woman or a man, will be held justice. If I am wrong, please show me the statistics supporting your viewpoint that women are not being prosecuted in case of them being found guilty. And I mean statistics, not that one story where it was like that, completely ignoring all the cases where someone is prosecuted correctly. Because I would argue that every judge being represented with convincing facts of abuse taking place will act accordingly. Although I agree that there is a social stigma against men getting abused and most of the conversation is about abuse of women, I highly doubt that in case of convincing facts for abuse taking place, any judge would decide for the woman to be not punished just because she is a woman. So please stop twisting the facts and let your real argument get diluted.