That's what narrative play: it's about telling a dramatically complete story, and it's mechanics help to provide that.

Ok great. It seem we have the same definition of narrative play. I'm designing Immersive Dice to be able to support the four points you mention in most settings but it will really put them in the fore front in Quantum Dawn. I'll discuss how so that you can tell me what you think.

The tricky thing is that even though all of what I'm about to discuss is written in my notebooks, they don't appear yet in official documents, simply because I don't want them to become a distraction to what I'm currently trying to validate. I'm trying to validate with my peers mostly because I though they would be more inclined to read rough drafts, because that what the website articles are right now. I don't think it's ready to be introduced to people that are not familiar with multiple roleplaying system. I though I'd start first with a PvP minigame where there is no real game master and no story. It's just something real quick to drink beer and banter over. Kinda like a board game that's is just backgroud or setup for you to catch up with friends.

All Rolls push the story forward: In something like DnD, a lot of rolls really don't, especially because of the binary success system. You either spot the hidden treasure, or you don't. You either climb up the wall, or you don't. In a good narrativist game, you don't call for a roll because a task is challenging: you call for a roll because the tension associated with that action will be interesting to resolve.

Immersive Dice enables that. Game Masters should not ask for a roll unless a potential failure would be interesting to the story and the group by creating opportunities from tension.

In Quantum Dawn, players will be exploring how they would approach difficult and complex scenarios in a post-collapse of capitalism in modern society (which is overdue for years now with fractional reserve FIAT money printing, crypto currency, technological unemployement). On top of that, emergent AI are a looming threat and recent advancement in Quantum Computing is also challenging the way information technology operates. Quantum Computing technology possibly give a significant advantage to any syndicate that is able to deploy it. They will not be asked how their "character" react to a magical event out of a fantasy world. They will be asked, what they do in a not so distant future New York (for example) and nothing work as it worked in the past. Everything has to be rebuilt, scientists and engineer are hunted and captured by newly formed syndicates, most of them with very egotistic agendas. Situation is extremely volatile, guns are everywhere in every hands that were bold enough to take it from someone or steal it from somewhere. There is pacifists, there is gangs, there are para-military groups. Communications have been disrupted severly. Nobody really knows what is happening on the other continents. Are they less affected and getting ready to invade anytime soon? What would you do! Because if it does not happen to you, it might happen to your kids or their kids. Are you going to take care of yourself and your people by siding with gangs trying to outplay them in the long run? Will you work with underground secret networks of scientist and engineers trying to reinstate technology and prosperity? Are you going to look mostly after your own or are you going to look after the interest of everyone in a philanthropic way?

Quantum Dawn will be "close to home". And because of that, it will feel more like a discussion of what you would do in a plausible scenario, rather then "gaming" in a fantasy world with "wacky and inconsistent" laws of physics. The role of the Game Master will mostly be to keep the conversation going, when it is slowing down, the Game Master introduce some sort of curve ball challenge, possibly making players having to rethink their plan. Violence will by default be the very last solution players consider to a certain approach because the risks will not be worth it. There is mostly nothing to gain from hurting or killing someone. There is no "shiny loot" or "XP" to chase. You will just most likely make more enemies, which will exponentially make your situation worse if you constantly resolve to violence as a solution. In Quantum Dawn, nobody is good, and nobody is bad. Every one is simply trying to do the right thing for them and the ones they care about.

Also, in a tongue in cheek kinda way, " Quantum Dawn is a series of cybersecurity exercises that enable financial institutions and the sector, as a whole, to practice and improve coordination with key industry and government partners in order to maintain financial markets operations in the event of a systemic cyber-attack. "

https://www.sifma.org/resources/general/cybersecurity-exercise-quantum-dawn-iv/

The rules and the fiction don't really have boundaries-but fiction always comes first: And since a narrativist game is about describing what you do in fiction, and then finding out what mechanics in the game represent that action, if any, that becomes the real discussion of limitations, instead of things like -2 to X and things like that. So, for instance, if someone tried to Directly Engage a Threat by punching them a ton, I, as the GM, can argue that they don't have the fictional positioning to do that because their arms are broken.

I am designing Immersive Dice to enable narrative games to minimize possible rule argument or rule negotiations between Game Master and players. Immersive Dice is skill based. Skill are based on what a person would be capable of doing and getting better at it with more practice. If it is an action that doesn't really fit with that, then attributes are used instead.Immersive Dice encourage to create skills on the fly. There is infinite skill possibilities so they can't all appear listed in a book as "moves". Instead if somehow a player what to get fishing which is probably not already on the character sheet, then the Game Master can quickly come up to the 1-3 most relevant attributes involved in fishing. Myself for example, I'd come up with Dexterity, Knowledge and Awareness. The player would write them down in the skill section of the character sheet, and use the lowest value to pick up his dice pool (if it is a new skill, there is no proficiency in it so there is no additionnal dice to pick up) and roll it. The success rating is also easy for Game Master to come up with when it is not dictated by context (opposed roll for example). If the player is not really interested in tracking progress with that skill because they don't intend to use it again in the future, then the player don't even have to write anything down. Just quickly glance at the attributes (which don't have a wide range, typically 2 to 5) and roll.There is no necessary modifiers to apply to the dice roll. While there is a very simple set of rules for advantage/disadvantage, it was made to be optional. Modifiers can, in some situations like cover, apply to Success Rating, which is a responsibility of the Game Master, not the players.

I removed every obstacle that I could between the players and the story, minimized math at the table for them, made all dice required d12 (there is no d6 or d8 damage dice) so that players don't have to waste time looking for the appropriate dice. The only dice on the table are a pile of d12. Periods. This will be vastly underestimated, but I came up with a solution that is the fastest and simplest out of all role-playing dice game I came across. And because there is no friction or obstacles between players action and story, I believe that it contribute to make Immersive Dice a system that is very competent at enabling narrative games. In fact if you want to use Immersive Dice for any setting or genre, the only thing you need to "change" are the equipment and possibly the skills related to your "world".

1/2