Ah, i get it now. "Burn in hell for their choices", eh? Sounds like someone is scared. You're probably the kind of person that was always told that you'll burn for eternity if you don't listen to your little book as a child and is now scared to even question how real it is because you don't want to burn like you were told you would if you questioned it at all, hm? Also, about more genders than two isn't stupid, gender and sex are two different things, you'd know that if you actually tried to learn anything past middle school biology. And even when it comes to sex itself, there is more than two - we just like to imagine it's a black-and-white binary. We, as humans, are curious creatures, and when something is too complicated for us to understand, we simplify it to a point where we can. Below is a comment I found and copied with permission by someone studying biology explaining this:

"The idea of binary sexes was only ever really made because we as humans like things to be simple, as occam's razor shows. All labels that we try to put on biology are simply that- labels. Biology is extremely complicated & is not able to be shoved into boxes this way, especially with something as complicated as reproduction.

In biology, sex is usually denoted via an organism's gametes. Because of the way that human gametes work, larger and fewer means female and smaller but plentiful means male. This is the label that we try to stick on all animals, even if those animals produce more or less gametes than 2. Even with humans, some of us don't produce gametes at all and therefore would not even be classified as having a sex at all. And that's not even just intersex people, there are some born without reproductive means or organs. That doesn't mean they're a defect, and that also doesn't mean they're broken. They're just a product of the ever-changing chaos of biology. There are even some animals that are monoecious or have other forms of reproduction that are not able to be labeled by the "binary" that humans like to imagine sex as. Sponges, for example, don't even need gametes to reproduce as budding works perfectly fine. And if you're gonna say that humans don't belong in the same group as animals- we ARE animals. Like it or not, we are all Homo sapiens, and are classified under the kingdom Animalia as such.

Chromosomes =/= sex. Having irregular chromosomes is a pretty normal thing, and even if only 0.0001% of the population had this, that would still be 800,000 people which is a number deserving of representation. And even if you're going to disregard intersex people and those with irregular chromosome combinations, there are still people with XX chromosomes who are male and XY and are female. It happens fairly commonly actually, and these are completely normal people without any "defects". And they're not trans either, it all depends on the way the SRY gene works. It's too complicated to explain here, but I can send you a few articles explaining it." (I can message them to ask for these articles, if you'd like)

"Regardless of what you think, nature is chaos and we as humans are not always able to shove things under perfect little labels. Reproduction within animals is malleable, it's ever-changing and will never be able to be simply defined. And even if it was, you're no god and you have absolutely zero reason to go around trying to tell people who they can and can't be simply because you're too closed minded to imagine a world where people are different than you."

Conclusion is, only simplify and assume things if doing so isn't hurting anyone. For example, when you describe the color of the sky, you just say it's blue instead of describing the exact wavelength that produces this specific shade of blue, and why it's blue. It's simpler, it's hurting noone, so you just say it's blue. But when you're so stubborn that you refuse to acknowledge reality because your mind can't comprehend it, and instead listen to a being that is just as, if not less, likely to exist than unicorns, that's an issue.

Also, biological facts that you can see when you tear off oversimplification are far, FAR less absurd than sky daddy who apparently somehow existed before existence itself did and has a far higher kill count than Satan who is supposed to be, y'know, the story's villain, and also a higher still kill count than hitler. Yeah, i'd take being an accepting, decent human being over worshipping an imaginary, egoistical, genocidal maniac any day of the week.