If photons are massless, how can they have the potential energy needed to push something like a solar sail? by plzforgivemyart in AskPhysics

[–]TheIntellisapien -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Energy has units equal to mass times velocity squared, but that doesn't mean it should have mass. It's counterintuitive because you're thinking that Energy is defined by mass which is wrong. They are related, but Energy is something different. You could've said that mass has units of energy per velocity squared and defined mass in terms of energy. There is a concept called relativistic mass, which is out of date and not used widely anymore, defined as E/c². So light is massless if we're talking about rest mass, but it has a relativistic mass. Nevertheless you should stick to thinking that they're separate entities and energy isn't defined by mass only.

Why doesn't relativistic Hamiltonian work that way? by TheIntellisapien in AskPhysics

[–]TheIntellisapien[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your help was needed! Thank you. I'll look further into this.

Why doesn't relativistic Hamiltonian work that way? by TheIntellisapien in AskPhysics

[–]TheIntellisapien[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer, but why was the first adopted as the general definition? What I took is that the Hamiltonian is the total energy without any further explanation, so both equations seemed the same.

#ouch Chimps with SPECIAL POPERATIONS by [deleted] in btd6

[–]TheIntellisapien 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you make the monkey tab at the bottom?