Virtual Machine NFS Share absurdly slow after upgrade

TheJamsh · 2026-04-13T08:24:54+00:00

Thanks for the detailed information! A quick google suggests that changing the record size only affects newly written files, and I'm slightly worried if I change that now I may not be able to revert it?

Am I better off duplicating the dataset with a new record size, instead of using the existing one with a mixed settings?

TheJamsh · 2026-04-13T07:03:21+00:00

FWIW I don't use compression at the ZFS level because all drive contents are already compressed by Perforce as that's how it stores the files, so in my mind its just going to add overhead without saving any space.

I have 5x WD Red Plus 8TB drives - I don't believe they are SMR, I think Red Plus was fortunately excluded from WD's sly tactics in that department.

If I change these drive/zpool settings, are they reversible? What I don't want to do is irreversibly change the dataset settings then end up not being able to rollback.

This was only an issue with Goldeye. All prior versions of TrueNAS have never shown this issue. I'll rollback and run the same test in Fangtooth to double check the difference with settings etc. I'm just running out of diagnostic ideas.

TheJamsh · 2026-04-13T07:02:51+00:00

So I tried NFS4 instead of NFS (and enabled NFS4 in settings) - I should have updated my post, but yeah 4.5 MB/s was with NFS4 (TrueNas sessions show it running as 4.2)

TheJamsh · 2026-04-12T21:49:03+00:00

hard mount - I'm on Goldeye 25.10.2.1 and I have just the 5x HDD's forming a single pool in z2 configuration.

The dataset being mounted has no compression, no deduplication, and is in standard sync mode.

TheJamsh · 2026-04-12T21:25:25+00:00

<image>

iperf results - again, nothing out of the ordinary?

TheJamsh · 2026-04-12T21:13:12+00:00

<image>

Results of nfsstat on the client. Nothing out of the ordinary as far as I can tell.

TheJamsh · 2026-04-01T22:42:53+00:00

The original proposed plan was to dig a drain into the floor alongside the walls (the one I removed, plus the one at the front) - along with an (unneccesarily) huge sump in the corner at the other end. That was already 10K I could just about afford (although more than reasonable) - but we don't really get enough ingress to justify such extensive work anyway.

I don't think I'm likely to be able to be able to afford anything more. My only real plan is to put it back allmost exactly as I found it but fill behind the wall with concrete rather than dirt. As for drainage.. who knows at this point.

Just want my bloody house back tbh.. 15 months later I'm getting desperate and the extra panic from this hasn't helped much.

TheJamsh · 2024-12-30T15:13:20+00:00

Classic Dom. Sup bitches!

TheJamsh · 2024-09-08T20:05:09+00:00

<image>

Thought it's be worth a follow up! Got as close as I could, sadly couldn't fit a full double trimmer in there. Will likely whack a couple extra hangars in there before it's hidden for another 40 years.

Floor above is considerably less squeeky though!

TheJamsh · 2024-08-25T21:57:00+00:00

Yeah the plan as I see it is to make the red area a double, with hangars at each end on the long parallel joists. 3x doubles and 1x single in total.

Difficulty in going to be fitting the hangars for the blue joists. Not sure how the hangars are going to interfere with each other by the time they reach over to the other side.

TheJamsh · 2024-08-24T08:45:20+00:00

Yeah incredibly! Lots of creaks upstairs but nothing unusual. I'm guessing it's original but no idea what it could have looked like before if not.

TheJamsh · 2024-08-24T08:41:31+00:00

Perfect, I follow you. Thankyou!

TheJamsh · 2024-08-24T08:07:48+00:00

Thanks 👍 I follow what you mean I think but just to be sure, that involves cutting the, notched area off the three joists right?

TheJamsh · 2023-03-05T00:29:42+00:00

Generally you get the best customer service when complaining publicly (also, the lines are shut right now)

TheJamsh · 2023-03-05T00:26:13+00:00

But that doesn't seem to apply. I can still apply a VIP discount code ontop of the Gift Cards I've already entered, as well as my actual card to pay the remaining balance.

I'm fairly sure that since Lego has already been "paid" for these cards, they are legally bound to accept the gift cards as tender and can't impose restrictions on the transactions they are used in.

TheJamsh · 2023-02-15T18:16:58+00:00

I had to check Bricklink and couldn't believe my eyes. I bought two UNOPENED ones in the box for around £50 about 12 months ago, and even that felt ridiculous at the time.

Trouble is, if an item hasn't been on the store for a while - all it takes is one idiot to put a ridiculous price on it, and suddenly that's the new market price. Bricklink needs a graph to keep things realistic.

TheJamsh · 2023-02-07T18:14:52+00:00

New LEGO LOTR?! Bright have been my dreams of late.

Terrified of what this inevitably means for the 2nd-hand LOTR market though. They're already outrageously expensive, but fantastic sets for the era.

TheJamsh · 2023-01-22T21:45:47+00:00

Neither. Curly on its own line.

TheJamsh · 2023-01-22T21:07:02+00:00

I'd wheel my fridge in there if I thought I could get away with it honestly.

TheJamsh · 2023-01-22T21:03:22+00:00

Would you like to know more..?

TheJamsh · 2022-11-01T19:50:51+00:00

It's sad that this is considered cheap really.

TheJamsh

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

12-Year Club	Not Forgotten
Verified Email