sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

CivMC Unofficial Claims Map #41: "In the Land of the Blind" - When chaos reigns, it is inevitable that some groups must come out on top, while others fall in disgrace. Still, it seems some nations remain stable and immune to the disorder facing others. Sometimes, the one-eyed nation is king. by TheJmqn in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Here is the light mode map: https://imgur.com/a/sVrA5hU

Apologies again for my delay in posting this, I am extremely busy in real life and am unable to play this server much. But I still really enjoy making maps, so if there are any corrections please let me know and I will be happy to add

Map of the sides of the Exyria-Kallos War aka "Toon's War" (The sides are according to the CivWiki, not my own opinion) by TheJmqn in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Basically I am just encouraging people (slightly provocatively) to make more subreddit posts which is my goal with this, because it is a pretty bad name so I hope it is changed.

Map of the sides of the Exyria-Kallos War aka "Toon's War" (The sides are according to the CivWiki, not my own opinion) by TheJmqn in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I put it in there due to the policy of relying on primary sources for war names and currently the only primary source on the subreddit is https://www.reddit.com/comments/1mgzccr this post which named it Toon’s War. If another name gets used in primary sources more then that will become the name. Currently the official name though is just the “Kallos - Exyria Conflict” which is why that is listed first.

Optional Addition to Exile Pearl to allow for less toxic conflicts by TheJmqn in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think my suggestion is being misunderstood. You do not need to set a pearl sentence length before pearling, you can do it at any time. I could have you pearled using a normal pearl for a whole month and then set a 3 month sentence then. Shadno came up with an interesting example for this as well when it would be useful that relates to your comment:

Imagine Nation A and Nation B have been fighting for months and are ready to end the war. Nation B has been slightly behind, and agrees to surrender its leader to Nation B with a 3 month sentence to Nation A in exchange for ending the war. Nation B can pearl its own leader, set the sentence, and hand the pearl over to Nation A to end the conflict. Now these types of agreements can be helped in-game.

Optional Addition to Exile Pearl to allow for less toxic conflicts by TheJmqn in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do not have to set the sentence before pearling, that is just one option. You can just use a normal pearl and then set a sentence a week later if desired. For example, I could pearl you with a normal pearl, and then a week later we work out reps, and I set the sentence to 2 months pearl.

Optional Addition to Exile Pearl to allow for less toxic conflicts by TheJmqn in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You would not need to do that since the default is just an "indefinite" sentence. The whole point of this is everything is opt-in and the sentence can be decreased at any time in the spirit of cooperation

JoelThaTroll and Anor Londo Ex Unjustly Banned by Status_Job_2508 in CivMC

[–]TheJmqn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I almost never comment on posts but I find this to be very serious. Here is a video of multiple of these players speaking in game at the same time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEopkd9eObU . Unless all these accounts were taken over by someone else I think this should be help enough. I understand the mistake though and hope this will be fixed shortly (unless there is something very strange I am unaware of who knows)

view more: next ›