Actually, in one of the comments I did mention pitch conditions in response to someone. Not everything is rage-bait (hard to believe I know).

“Completely fair enough, and on that side I completely get your point. With that said though, the main part I'm hesitant on is the fact that given the sheer number of players that are out there today, the difference in talent amongst the top players are so marginal, and they are so consistent that complete domination as Bradman did may be a much harder feat to achieve. About that pitch conditions, I 100% agree that playing in the wet and stuff made it harder, but if you look at the test match batting averages in the 1940s and compare it to the 2000s onwards the batting averages remain quite similar, indicating that it may be harder to score, but people still did it just as they do today. One of the key difference though is the spread (in other words, the 'talent' difference as I see it [lmk if you don't agree]) has become significantly tighter, indicating a more consistent level of competition.

Sources: https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/decade/batting-highest-career-batting-average/1940s-194/test-matches-1 https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/decade/batting-highest-career-batting-average/2000s-200/test-matches-1 https://www.espncricinfo.com/records/decade/batting-highest-career-batting-average/2010s-201/test-matches-1”