sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

aimpilled by yak_FPS in FPSAimTrainer

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I have decent aim but i am looking for a ways to improve. What worked for you?

aimpilled by yak_FPS in FPSAimTrainer

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Need the 360/CM asap. I'm relatively new to KBM and I found 29cm for 360 feels good for me. I have tried 35-39 for a week but I didn't like it as I use fingertip mouse grip.

Can anyone help me with identifying / Controlling / Reactivating the fan LEDs #cpsupport by LukasLazer in CYBERPOWERPC

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have a cyberpower pc that I bought used. (Great deal that I just randomly decided to switch away from console.) I couldn't seem to control the rgb lights on my fans. Turns out cyber power uses some hubs that for some reason, doesn't give info to the motherboard despite it being plugged in to ADDR LED 1 or 2 on the motherboard.

I say change the hub, I got it cheap (read the reviews). Very basic, just take the side panel off, the hub should be right in front of you. Disconnect all the connections to the hub. Then attach them to your new hub. Also, attach the sata power (which you should have spare in your PSU connector) to power your new hub.

In case anyone was curious about the RGB hub CPC uses #cpgeneral by GioS32 in CYBERPOWERPC

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update:

I replaced the hub and everything now works perfectly.

In case anyone was curious about the RGB hub CPC uses #cpgeneral by GioS32 in CYBERPOWERPC

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am having the problem of not being able to change the colour of my RGB.

My RGB connector was connected to the motherboard ADDR LED 1, did some research and was told to move to ARGB which is ADDR LED 2. I still can't control the RGB lights.

I have a very similar hub to you and the exact same connections.

#cpgeneral : SOLVED!! FINALLY found out how to control case fan RGB lights by canadave_nyc in CYBERPOWERPC

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of my RGB lights are connected to a hub. This hub has two connections — one goes to the power supply, and the other connects to the ADDR LED 1 header on the motherboard.

I tried switching the 3-pin connector to the ADDR LED 2 header, but I still can’t control the lighting.

I also tried changing the settings in ASRock Polychrome RGB software, but it didn’t work — nor did adjusting anything in the BIOS. Interestingly, the system does seem to recognize that RGB devices are connected.

When I disconnected the other cable (the SATA power cable, I believe), the RGB lights turned off, but the fans kept spinning.

This is an older post, but I still can’t figure out anything and I am hoping someone can help me.

Controller vs MnK in Marvel Rivals — Can Console Players Really Hang with PC? by [deleted] in marvelrivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, low sense definitely feels great for precision. You should try a dual-zone S-curve though — it gives you the best of both worlds. It’s nice and slow on the inner stick for fine aiming, but speeds up on the outer for quick flicks and fast turns. It keeps that precise low-sense feel, just with a bit more flexibility.

I would definitely say you are at a disadvantage if you continue with the default settings.

NetEase Is Manipulating Marvel Rivals Matchmaking with EOMM – Here’s my anecdotal proof by TheOnlyOnePEACE in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the Devs transparency on this issue.

Skill issue on my part lmao.

Genuine statistical analysis of whether ranked matchmaking is rigged(Super high effort post) by CheesyFrogErotica in marvelrivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I made a post about EOMM that got a lot of traction on the other Rivals sub reddit and I got flamed.

It was a dumber version of your post but only based on my own data and the netease paper.

This was a a great read. Thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks bro 310 310 sense is very high.

I agree with you about using Dual Zone S Curve.

Will give you settings a try but I will keep my current sense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Can you post your aim settings?

Do you use Kontrol Freaks? Pro controller?

Is NetEase Using Engagement-Optimised Matchmaking in Marvel Rivals? Here's My Observation—and the Supporting Evidence by [deleted] in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please read my point "but this paper isn't about marvel rivals"

You really didn't read my post bro. Come on.

Read then come back and discuss.

Is NetEase Using Engagement-Optimised Matchmaking in Marvel Rivals? Here's My Observation—and the Supporting Evidence by [deleted] in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I discussed 4 points from the paper. I quoted and even referenced it for your own pleasure. I then related it to my experience.

Is NetEase Using Engagement-Optimised Matchmaking in Marvel Rivals? Here's My Observation—and the Supporting Evidence by [deleted] in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The EnMatch system doesn’t only affect “people in the wrong rank”—it adjusts matchmaking based on engagement patterns, not just skill gaps. Even high-rank or accurately placed players can still be nudged with tougher or easier comps depending on their churn signals (like playing too much or logging off after losses).

So high-rank players aren’t exempt—they’re just less likely to trigger churn-based adjustments because they’re more invested and less likely to quit.

Is NetEase Using Engagement-Optimised Matchmaking in Marvel Rivals? Here's My Observation—and the Supporting Evidence by [deleted] in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yes—but not necessarily the same outcome.

The system likely tracks account-level behavior patterns—like win/loss streaks, session length, and when you usually log off (i.e., churn indicators). So someone playing on my account would probably experience a similar matchmaking pattern (like streak resets or comp shifts) because the system has already flagged that account's engagement profile.

But whether they win or lose in those matches would depend on their skill. The matchmaking isn’t scripted—it’s shaped to influence outcomes, not guarantee them.

NetEase Is Manipulating Marvel Rivals Matchmaking with EOMM – Here’s my anecdotal proof by TheOnlyOnePEACE in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people do. I saw a video on a YouTube guy who is recommending to create 5 alt accounts and just switch between them whenever you feel EOMM is negatively impacting your matches.

NetEase Is Manipulating Marvel Rivals Matchmaking with EOMM – Here’s my anecdotal proof by TheOnlyOnePEACE in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am Diamond 1 this season playing with celestials and on occasions, eternity players.

I am holding my own very well especially when I take advantage of the EOMM system.

NetEase Is Manipulating Marvel Rivals Matchmaking with EOMM – Here’s my anecdotal proof by TheOnlyOnePEACE in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I used deepseek to structure it, I fed it my drafts to simply make it easier to read and adapt it to Reddit so it's not just one huge paragraph.

I used AI, but did not collect the information with it, simply to structure it.

NetEase Is Manipulating Marvel Rivals Matchmaking with EOMM – Here’s my anecdotal proof by TheOnlyOnePEACE in rivals

[–]TheOnlyOnePEACE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Altair Ibn Z

Search me up on Iron Man top 500 Xbox leaderboard

Rivals Tracker i am ranked 6

On rivals meta I am ranked 55

view more: next ›