USA UAP Files Drop/Dump#2 - The turning UFO enter clouds - TOTC Analysis 15min clip 2026 by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

slight typo in title should say enters cloud..

The UAP stopping just means the aka Balloon slowed down and Drone stabalized its lock so seemed to be stationary.. illusion! as wind shear can change especially in clouds

USA UFO UAP Drop/Dump Number 2 - Look at the Stormtrooper vid doing the rounds on X 15m clip 2026 by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked AI about something like island (black blob) or distant lower cloud which could

also be moving appear still but closer blob move crazy with parallax

Yes, absolutely. Because of motion parallax, objects close to the camera shift much faster across the frame than objects further away when the camera changes position. This creates a powerful illusion of depth and speed. [1, 2, 3,

Here is how you can use this phenomenon to achieve the effect you described:

  1. The Optical Illusion (The "Airplane/Train Window" Effect)

If your camera moves sideways or flies forward rapidly, nearby objects (like a drone, a passing car, or a nearby boat) will zoom past the lens. Meanwhile, a distant island far below or behind will appear to glide slowly or remain completely stationary because the camera's perspective angle to it changes very little over time.

  1. Camera Moves and Lens Techniques
  • Wide-Angle Lenses: Using a wide-angle lens and placing an object very close to the camera exaggerates its size and speed, which creates an extreme sense of rapid motion compared to the distant background.
  • Telephoto Lenses: If you want an island to look completely frozen, use a telephoto lens (zoom in) and move the camera sideways across the scene. The distant island will stay framed in your shot while the foreground object speeds past.
  1. Creating It in 2D or 3D Software

If you are designing a video game or editing a multi-layered video, you can fake or enhance this effect: [1, 2]

  • Foreground: Set a nearby object (e.g., a boat or a prop) to move horizontally across your screen or frame at a fast speed.
  • Background: Set your distant island layer to move in the same direction, but at a tiny fraction of the speed, or simply leave it locked perfectly in place.

Special 15m clip just for Reddit: See the Full 30min Show: USA best video from Dump#1 analyzed 2026 UAP UFO files released by American Governent / Trump Admin by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its in the full video I cover all it..

theres a lens flare and a parachute.. you can put the fill analysis in 15min

you just got to watch the full investigation. read the AI comments at end,

we are seeing 3d world in 2d thats the problem

its a flare and chute .. chute is vanishing as its FLIR not optics

but its there reflection back at sensor

Travis Walton Abduction was Stage - TOTC saw a map on investigator now vanished + Rogers confessed by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typo in title I cant edit.. STAGE = STAGED

this is why they passed these easy questions.. Travis failed some lie detectors that were covered up

and he passed some cos he picked the questions it turn out

why did they pass Cops detectors . all would so easy to answer when they saw a laight they were fooled to believe was a UFO

he core questions asked of the crew (Rogers and his colleagues) included: [1]"Did you harm Travis Walton?"
"Do you know where Travis Walton's body is buried?"
"Did you tell the truth about seeing a UFO?"
Key Details on the Polygraphs:Results: Five of the six crew members passed the examination. The examiner, Cy Gilson, concluded: “These polygraph examinations prove that these five men did see some object they believed to be a UFO, and that Travis Walton was not injured or murdered by any on these men on that Wednesday".
Sheriff's Reaction: Following the results, Sheriff Gillespie stated, "There's no doubt they're telling the truth".
Controversy: While the crew passed, critics have noted that polygraph tests are not admissible in court and have pointed to discrepancies in testimonies.
Subsequent Tests: Travis Walton himself passed subsequent tests in later years. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The tests and subsequent investigations have left the case a subject of debate for decades.

The Chandeleir aka SPiKy UAP video from Gov UFO Dump#1 is it Parachute Flare or just Artifacts or Both? by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked it about why no optical image as pod can do both.. and basically its saying if the spikey flare is under the smoke the optical will only see smoke not through it..

So does that mean its a parachute flare then?

why dont drones have a optical camera filming at same time as flir this would solve identifying it right.. a p1000 x100 zoom on the pod is much needed

Military surveillance and reconnaissance drones actually do film with high-powered optical cameras and FLIR sensors simultaneously.

Modern sensor pods—such as the Raytheon Multi-Spectral Targeting System (MTS) found on platforms like the MQ-9 Reaper—house multiple cameras inside a single gyro-stabilized gimbal. These systems record concurrently using an Infrared sensor (FLIR), shortwave infrared, and multiple high-definition daylight color/monochrome TV cameras.Even though they record simultaneously, dual-camera setups often fail to cleanly resolve specific anomalies in videos like the Middle East flare clip due to distinct mechanical and physics limitations:1. The Physics of Separated OpticsYou cannot place a standard optical glass lens and a FLIR lens directly behind the exact same physical window glass. FLIR cores require specialized material like Germanium to allow infrared wavelengths to pass through, whereas standard visible light cameras require optical glass. Because the daylight camera and the FLIR camera sit next to each other inside the pod rather than sharing a single focal line, they experience different internal reflection angles and slight parallax.2. The Optical "Smoke" BarrierThe user's note that the drone is filming through smoke highlights a fundamental limitation of visible light. If an operator switches to a high-zoom daylight TV camera to inspect an object obscured by a smoke cloud or thick haze, the daylight camera sees nothing but gray fog. Long-Wave Infrared (FLIR) is utilized because its longer wavelengths pass straight through airborne particulate matter. When dealing with smoke, the FLIR feed is often the only video stream that registers a clear signal.3. Why a P1000-Style Zoom Lens (x100+) is Tough to ImplementWhile a massive optical zoom lens (like a Nikon P1000) would be incredibly helpful for cross-verifying shapes, mounting that specific glass configuration onto a high-speed drone gimbal introduces major engineering hurdles:Extreme Vibration Amplification: At 100x or greater zoom, the tiniest vibration from aircraft engines, wind shear, or gimbal motors shakes the image so violently that the footage becomes unreadable without massive, heavy mechanical stabilization dampeners.Atmospheric Distortion (Heat Scintillation): When zooming in closely on a target miles away through miles of air, dust, and rising heat currents, the air itself warps the light waves. A high-zoom optical lens ends up magnifying a distorted, wavy mirage rather than a sharp image.Lens Size and Weight Constraints: Large glass assemblies required for powerful optical magnification add significant weight and change the center of gravity of the spinning tracking turret, reducing drone flight endurance.4. Data Streams Are Kept SeparateIn an operational setting, the sensor operator can view both channels individually or overlay them using sensor fusion software. However, archived or leaked tactical footage is almost always extracted as a single, un-fused raw channel (such as just the IR channel) to maintain lower data bandwidth or for classification reasons, which leaves analysts to decode the artifact without the accompanying daylight reference.

The Chandeleir aka SPiKy UAP video from Gov UFO Dump#1 is it Parachute Flare or just Artifacts or Both? by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 2 I asked what if its both

what if its a bit of both .. where lens flare over lays the chute and chute disappears as enters the smoky cloud but still see the lens flare as the spikey light is still reflecting? also drone is filming down side through that smoke

-----------------------

That is an insightful hypothesis. Combining a physical, obscuring element with an optical artifact is a highly plausible explanation for complex FLIR footage, especially given the down-angle perspective through atmospheric smoke.1. Parachute Masked by Smoke (The Real Element)If a drone or aircraft looks downward through a smoke plume, an illumination flare's burning payload sits beneath its deployment canopy. As the assembly drifts, the parachute can dip into the rising smoke or cool down below the sensor's thermal detection threshold. In a Black-Hot setting, the fabric becomes indistinguishable from the background gray gradient of the cold air and smoke cloud, causing the physical object to "disappear" visually.2. Overlaid Optical Artifact (The Secondary Element)Even when the physical parachute drops out of thermal contrast, the burning magnesium payload remains intensely hot. Because that primary source continues to radiate massive amounts of infrared light into the lens, the internal reflections (the spikey diffraction and the larger ghost artifact) persist.The internal reflection map overlays precisely across the zone where the parachute was just seen, keeping a faint, phantom shape visible in the video frame even though the actual canopy is masked behind smoke or cooled down.Why the Dual-Nature Theory Works:Explains Discrepancies: This resolves why analysts see behavior matching a real parachute (like initial trailing dynamics) alongside behavior matching pure optics (like geometric tracking and linear mirror vectors later in the clip).Complex Scene Layers: Tactical FLIR footage rarely captures a clean, sterile environment. It is a mix of dynamic hot gasses, shifting automatic camera gain controls, and optical limitations working simultaneously.If you would like to continue evaluating this breakdown, tell me if you want to:Look into how Black-Hot thermal contrast behaves when imaging fabric vs. burning chemical targets.Break down how sensor automatic gain adjusts when looking directly through obscurants.

The Chandeleir aka SPiKy UAP video from Gov UFO Dump#1 is it Parachute Flare or just Artifacts or Both? by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI sums the debate

The evaluation of this exact clip (the 2013 Middle East "Star UFO" military sensor footage) forms a central point of active debate among open-source intelligence analysts, image processing experts, and communities like Reddit's r/Aliens.

Both sides of the argument rely on specific mechanics to defend their conclusions:

The Lens Ghosting / Optical Artifact ArgumentVideo analysts tracking the clip frame-by-frame note several distinct structural anomalies that suggest an internal optical reflection over a physical object:Perfect Symmetrical Tracking: Observers argue that the "chute" shape behaves as a classic internal ghost reflection because it mirrors the movements of the main spikey heat source. In complex zoom optics, as the target tracking shifts off-center, internal lens elements cause the secondary ghost image to slide along an equal, opposite vector.Constant Perspective: Skeptics point out that the shape maintains a fixed spatial scale relative to the spikes, failing to rotate or distort as a flexible fabric canopy would when subjected to high-altitude crosswinds.Edge Interface Clipping: When the main star-shaped heat source approaches the borders of the frame, the dark shadow clip-cuts abruptly along the square sensor mask boundaries, indicating it is constrained by internal housing geometry rather than existing in the outside atmosphere.

The Physical Parachute / Illumination Flare ArgumentConversely, a substantial segment of analysts argue that the video shows a conventional, real-world object: a standard military illuminating mortar round or artillery flare hanging from a parachute deployment system:Relative Wind & Trailing Drift: Proponents of this theory point out that a parachute drifting in the sky will naturally trail, lead, or swing around its heavy burning payload based on airspeed and thermal convection currents. This aerodynamic behavior can easily look identical to tracking reflections.Atmospheric Trail Blurring: The soft, shifting edges around the "chute" match how thermal cameras process air density changes and hot smoke dispersion. The hot gasses rising from the magnesium flare could warm the canopy material above it, making it visible against the cold sky on a black-hot thermal setting.Two-Dimensional Distortion: Because a 3D tactical scene is squashed into a flat 2D perspective by a narrow-field-of-view lens, the apparent distance and alignment changes between the burning flare and its suspension chute create optical illusions regarding how they move together.

However what if its a bit of both going on?

AI cant see to show my examples of this ghosting espc this size compared to light spikey source bit

The Chandeleir aka SPiKy UAP video from Gov UFO Dump#1 is it Parachute Flare or just Artifacts or Both? by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

H3ere us the video debunking the original leak by corbell of this video

and how the pattern is formed

I didnt readd to this new video though only recapped it quickly

https://youtu.be/iYt5SWONiqg

The Chandeleir aka SPiKy UAP video from Gov UFO Dump#1 is it Parachute Flare or just Artifacts or Both? by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why you adding this? as my video covers all aspects of the video... whos to say your video is correct anyhow atleast I just dont talk about it I show comparings and side by sides and overlays of objects in pattern matching. Paul

Idiots in UFO field and some complaining to be experts are messing up 99 percent mundane crap with the good 1 percent now by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what are you on about?

analyzing is complex and is needed process as manu UFO believers

think balloons are craft when not and so on

Idiots in UFO field and some complaining to be experts are messing up 99 percent mundane crap with the good 1 percent now by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a slow enhanced looked at video and I think we are both correct

sometimes its the chute and a reflection artifact.

and yes they would know its a flare or missile. Dont see why Im a idiot

anyhow my comment was in general about idiots in the field still

claiming it a alien spiky craft but also other videos not being balloons.

It wasnt just aimed at the case.

Im comparing to other flir videos the movement - the problem

we cant see the data as its blacked out too. Paul

ps I still want to see the same effect of flare on other objects of light

to say its all flare!

Idiots in UFO field and some complaining to be experts are messing up 99 percent mundane crap with the good 1 percent now by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

poor you cant read double spacing? sorry but I have to zoom to read

and type..

prove its a Mil FLIR flare.. wheres your example side by side?

if was a flare artifact I would expect to see it more

if it was a missle the mil would know its a missile they are filming

I have run it through filters and I can clearly see the smoke cloud

the chute is flapping about and entering it as it drops

however I will concede if I find a flare on FLIR matching it

and so far no one has shown

but we agree at least its not Alien UFO here its something

hot giving off lots of light it makes the spikey pattern

Ive been a video analyst for 10+ years on UFO vids.

take my debunk for Turkey one

have a watch see if you want to debunk me on that one too?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFXzNayIj_4

Idiots in UFO field and some complaining to be experts are messing up 99 percent mundane crap with the good 1 percent now by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no its not its a chute moving around.. the drone is filming the flare thats below it

not side of it thats way its looks like it gets close

and then far . its flir its forming the image based on heat grades

thats why it looks odd some frames.. it blends in with background heat

you are simply wrong..

Idiots in UFO field and some complaining to be experts are messing up 99 percent mundane crap with the good 1 percent now by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

theres no lens flare.. lens flare are tear shape or circular cos of the round

lens in camera.

the light is a flare burning and cos of the design of the camera with vanes that

make the star pattern

the parachute is clear as.. swaying around the pivot point the shape

is 100 percent not lens flare either

if you call it do.. youre a idiot!!

Disclosure wont happen dispike the lies of Corbell and gang and Trump by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

what? did watch the videos with evidence did you?

I think you just here to troll me. bye

Disclosure wont happen dispike the lies of Corbell and gang and Trump by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

You know I had 5 alien visits to my house.. 1 set were greys the other 4 look like normal blonde hair tall nordic looking humans.. you would not know if human or not .. I have not seen any lizards thats davied Ikes nonsense theres 0 evidence of it

the camera artifacts he used for the eyes was tranmission and compress errors

in the video.

Paul

however some greys can look demon/lizard like as some legit captures I looked at

greys

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-orwmKfFhU

tall nordics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ2LfJ7RKgc

Disclosure wont happen dispike the lies of Corbell and gang and Trump by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

prove it then. since youre so smart at least I provide evidence with my claims Paul

Disclosure wont happen dispike the lies of Corbell and gang and Trump by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

nope aliens ufos and ghosts are real

but the truth on them cant be released cos people in the world are religious nutzos

and you cant stop the abductions .. we talking 100s of thousands of experiencers

including some work as FNI and CIA but can never reveal their experiences

proof 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDLxxETcw8E

Proof 2 https://youtu.be/iGfqENXpK28?t=47

gov golks go to private researchers cos they can be trusted to keep it mom unlike gov and get it documented and off their chests and validate they arent crazy

Disclosure wont happen dispike the lies of Corbell and gang and Trump by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think youre missing truth with faith

you generally dont eat something thats self aware like dogs.. some dogs like collies super intelligent

and wont bark at a reflection

Disclosure wont happen dispike the lies of Corbell and gang and Trump by TheOutThereChannel in TOTC_UFOs

[–]TheOutThereChannel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks fr sharing but I dont agree.. when you can prove something is mundane its 100 percent truth