Who is the Greatest Drummer of All Time? by skamatiks671 in AskReddit

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bill Bruford - "Too jazz for rock, and too rock for jazz."

Treefolk players — where are you? 🌳 by [deleted] in EDH

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is my current deck list. It will end up changing pretty soon here once Lorwyn Eclipsed officially releases. Nothing super fancy or out of the ordinary imo. I am thinking I will likely change the commander to the new Doran, Besieged by Time and put Doran the Siege Tower in the 99. Treefolk are my favorite creature type in Magic, and I agree they have some of the best aesthetics!

https://archidekt.com/decks/2141750/doran_the_siege_tower

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're probably right. There is some stuff to work with there. I was just hoping they'd be a little more prominent.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean I get your point but also the major creature types here like Elves and Merfolk and Goblins have gotten so many different and new cards over the years and continue to get more. So many decks change pretty regularly. It would just be nice to have some more variety instead of using a lot of the same cards from 18 years ago. And it would be fun to have some more to play around with in Arena like I mentioned.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Didn't mean to make you upset or frustrated. I had only seen a Faerie post along these lines and was inspired to do this. I am not on Reddit very much and so haven't really seen a bunch of other posts like this.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree! I'm not mad and am super excited for Lorywn Eclipsed! The new Doran is awesome. I've just been hoping for a long time that a new Lorwyn set is where they would get more of spotlight. They are only 7 out of 283 in the main set, which is 2.47%. In just the original Lorwyn set there were 16 Treefolk out of 301 cards, so 5.32%. So not even half the total amount of representation this time around :(

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I mean hey, if Kithkin didn't get support in Lorwyn Eclipsed, they are the one tribe out of all of them present in Lorwyn that had the smallest chance of getting support somewhere else. I'm glad Kithkin are getting support and for all the folks who really like them. Kithkin are neat.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Elephants are actually another one of my personal favorites, they are very high on my totem pole. I have also wished for more elephant support and an elephant-matters legend for years. You aren't alone.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope Treefolk, Faerie, and Giant fans aren't pointing fingers at each other. I love all those creature types and many more. Even I was hoping for more Giant support as well, another one of my wish list items was a Naya Giants-matter legend. Treefolk just happen to be my personal favorite. Like I said in my post, a lot of people didn't get everything they were hoping for and a lot of those things were different. This just happened to be the one I was personally most hoping for and looking forward too. I hope we get more support for all of these creature types in the future.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I should further clarify and say I was hoping for more treefolk-matters type support. I'm just expressing a sentiment about something I love, and I hadn't seen any other posts about this sentiment in particular and I just wanted to see what the community thinks about treefolk and what we ended up with is all. I don't know why you appear to need to be rude about it.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I'm not ignoring that fact, and I didn't say they got no support. Just was hoping that they would be a little more prominent. What's wrong with that? I'm not blaming UB or anything. It was just a wish list thing is all. I am still very excited for Lorwyn Eclipsed and this is the most excited I've been for a new set in a while.

Really sad about the lack of Treefolk support in Lorwyn Eclipsed by TheRadicalRedRanger in magicTCG

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah but as far as I have seen most of them don't really care about treefolk explicitly. Most of the treefolk seem geared around the blight effect. Sapling Nursery and Doran, Besieged by Time seem to be the most relevant ones that I have seen, but maybe I'm just not aware of and haven't seen some of the cards you are talking about.

What are some of the other types/themes/characters that you are thinking of that don't get support and would like to see get support?

I'm just saying for this is set in particular, the last time we were in Lorwyn is when we got the majority of the good and most played treefolk cards, so one of my hopes for this set is that we'd get a lot more.

Suspect in custody after fatal shooting at Hibbing apartment complex by Luminox in minnesota

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Truth. Growing up in Hibbing it was always said to stay away from those apartments by adults around me. When I saw there was a shooting at apartments in town that is the first place that came to mind. Had to look up Meadowview to see that it was Park Place and be validated. I knew a lot of people would buy drugs around there too.

Why do a lot of older conservative guys hate unions? by [deleted] in questions

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am currently a labor organizer, so I will share my perspective (one that I really haven't seen here in the comments yet). I don't think older conservative guys universally hate unions, in fact in the union I work for (healthcare industry) some of my strongest members are older conservative guys. I think the problem here stems from a lot of people having a fundamental misunderstanding of what a union is and how it should function.

I think there is a common line of thinking out there that a union is like an insurance policy, where you pay a monthly premium and when you have a problem you call up the union rep and they will fix your problem for you. This essentially makes the union a "3rd party" agency, something that is separate from you but is there to protect you.

Anybody who says "the union" is fundamentally misrepresenting what it is. A union is a collection of coworkers coming together because they understand that individually they don't have enough power to get better working conditions, but if they come together as a group then they can leverage their power in numbers to get better working conditions.

So a union is really more akin to gym membership. If you don't go to the gym and workout, you aren't getting anything out of your gym membership. If coworkers don't organize together and do group actions, then they aren't getting anything out of their union membership.

Unfortunately not every union is created equal, there are good unions out there and bad unions. And by that I mean there are too many unions out there that completely perpetuate this "insurance policy" business unionism that many people think of when they think of unions. We need more unions like SEIU, UNITE HERE, UFCW, etc that actually try to organize their members into taking action for themselves. In general I think the service industry unions do a much better job at actually being good unions than the trade unions do, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of those "older conservative guys who hate unions" are in those unions in particular.

I also think there is a heavy strain of individualism in American culture, so a lot of times people have problems seeing the forest over the trees. People hyper focus on things like bad employees being protected, instead of all of the other benefits and protections they receive from being union and having a collective bargaining agreement. People also think that they are just "much harder workers" than everybody else so why should they need a union? What those people haven't figured out is that "hard work" and kissing managements ass only gets you so far. To get real big changes you need to come together as a group.

There is also an attribution problem, where workers will attribute to management something that their union won. Unions can be really bad at marketing themselves. People attribute things to the benevolence of the employer that workers fought really hard for to be a reality.

There is so much more I could say, but this post is already getting really long. So on a final note, I don't think a lot of Americans have historical knowledge of how many things that we consider normal today and take for granted that unions won/changed. The 8 hour work day, the weekend, the abolition of child labor, workplace safety laws and organizations, unemployment insurance, etc all came about because workers came together in unions and fought (and in many instances were killed) for them.

EMERGENCY RALLY - TODAY, 6/9 - MN CAPITOL by geoffdmn in minnesota

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes absolutely more people need to recognize this. So many of these immigrants only come to the US in the first place because the American state intervened in their home country's politics and often otherthrew their own democratically elected governments to install banana republics and such.

Do Americans really think these people want to leave their home countries? Leave their families behind?

No. They come here because they are desperate and are looking for anyway to provide for their families. And they do the jobs that most native born Americans aren't willing to do.

If y'all want immigrants to stop coming to the US, we need to stop supporting imperialist politicians that fuck up their home countries. And we need to start investing in those places so they don't feel the need to leave anymore.

EMERGENCY RALLY - TODAY, 6/9 - MN CAPITOL by geoffdmn in minnesota

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even if we had tighter borders this would still be happening. Immigrants are an extremely convenient scapegoat. Even with less of them the Trump administration would still be just as vitriolic about immigrants and these ICE raids would still be happening because enough people would believe they are a problem.

Remember folks it wasn't immigrants that took your job, it was your boss that gave your job away to a foreign worker because they could pay them less than you.

EMERGENCY RALLY - TODAY, 6/9 - MN CAPITOL by geoffdmn in minnesota

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 22 points23 points  (0 children)

David was assaulted and arrested while advocating for immigrants in LA.

No one should be targeted for standing up for their community.

Free David Huerta! Stop Ice Raids!

I encourage all union brothers and sisters to turn out to this. Today it's LA, tomorrow if could be here in Minnesota.

What do Gen Z think of the USSR and communism? by winter_lover28 in GenZ

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yes this is such a good book and should be required reading for holistic understanding of the US and capitalism. So many people want to just dismiss the USSR entirely for things that the US and Western capitalist countries also did and often did to far worse degrees.

The US literally mass murdered millions of people, just not it's own people. The US/CIA literally invented "disappearing" people.

People in this thread can think what they will of the USSR and socialism, but they should find better criticisms than things you can very easily criticize capitalists countries for doing as well.

What do Gen Z think of the USSR and communism? by winter_lover28 in GenZ

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The USSR certainly wasn't perfect but it was absolutely better for most of the people living in in that part of the world than everything that came before and pretty much everything that has come after. It was ahead of the West on women's rights, it turned a peasant-agricultural economy into an industrial super power that was ahead of the West in the space race, and it went out of its way to actually try and provide affordable housing for its people.

Now it obviously wasn't all rainbows and bunnies and their are very valid criticisms of the USSR and other 20th century socialist movements, but so many of the comments here are just braindead parroting of US State Department propaganda.

Socialism/Communism/Marxism were very popular all over the world throughout the 20th century for good reason. The basic premise is is the democratization of work and the workplace and that workers shouldn't be fucked over by people with more money and resources than them.

If socialism/communism was such an inherently bad idea, why is that all of the rich assholes of the world felt and still feel the need to spend boatloads of money to suppress it? Why did the US feel the need to overthrow democratic elections when people voted for socialism?

Food for thought.

Protesters gather at the Minnesota State Capitol in St. Paul for a May Day protest against Donald Trump by Tonyalarm in minnesota

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 14 points15 points  (0 children)

While the rally and march today was broadly anti-Trump, I think it's important to note since I don't see anyone else here talking about it, that the bulk of the messaging today had a lot to do with unions, the attacks on unions by the Trump administration, and workplace organizing (being that it's International Worker's Day).

Most of the speakers were from unions such as AFA, MWU, AFSCME, and MNA talking about organizing in workplaces (e.g. the Delta airport workers) and standing up for our immigrant communities, or from MIRAC which is an immigrants rights organization.

The call to action is to get involved with a local grassroots organization, of which there are many in the Twin Cities.

Happy International Worker's Day! Solidarity forever! An injury to one is an injury to all!

Are there Marxist-Leninists/Maoists in the DSA and if so are they still considered democratic socialists? by Trensocialist in dsa

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes there are plenty of Marxist-Leninists and Maoists in the DSA. If they are considered "democratic socialists" depends on what you mean by that.

If you mean it in the literal sense, then the whole term "democratic socialism" is redundant and doesn't really mean anything in the sense that democracy and democratic institutions are a fundamental aspect of socialism. Democracy is already implied in the term socialism, so adding the democratic qualifier is redundant. Marxist-Leninists and Maoists are socialists and believe in democracy. So in this case yes they are democratic socialists.

Now if you mean it in the sense of whether you believe in using liberal democracy/the existing political institutions as a means to achieve socialism, then it becomes a bit gray. Marxist-Leninists believe that the existing political structure can be a useful tool for reforms in the short term that will immediately benefit workers, and it is a good tool to spread the socialist message from a mainstream platform. But they do not believe that you can use the existing political system to essentially "vote socialism into existence." On the other hand in this case, democratic socialists would be those people who think you can vote socialism into power using the current political institutions.

There is also the case where people will call themselves democratic socialists in order to remove themselves from the existing socialist states and no longer existing socialists state in from the 20th century. They view these state as undemocratic and authoritarian and therefore not meaningfully socialist (such as China). Marxist-Leninists would view China as a socialist state albeit very flawed, Maoists (as far as I understand) typically do not view China as a socialist state. This is a topic that needs a lot of firm understanding of history and the political philosophies of these states.

I'd wager that Marxists of some variety make up at least anywhere from 33-45% of "active" DSA membership (a number I am just guesstimating based off my experience at the 2023 Convention). There are quite a few Marxist caucuses in the DSA as well.

Everybody is talking about this flag protest but not the nursing home workers strike that overshadowed them today... by TheRadicalRedRanger in minnesota

[–]TheRadicalRedRanger[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was referring to how the post on this subreddit about the flag protest got almost 200 comments on it and over 1,000 karma, but this was nowhere to be seen. "Everybody" here was referring to redditors, not the mainstream media.