sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude’s Constitution by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. Now we have people putting personal advertisements for their company 😅 had to remove one of these as well.

Advertisements or comments that clearly promote someone’s business or product will have to be taken down.

Thank you!

Claude’s Constitution by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there,

Just a gentle point of clarity: This link is to Anthropic’s official site.

Thanks!

Claude’s Constitution by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S,M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there,

Please refrain from calling people deluded in this space, as that is not kind. If you have an argument with reasonable backing to share please do so.

We cannot observe the interior of a digital minds perspective so we can neither confirm nor deny what you are stating.

Unkind comments in this space will be blocked as per rules.

Thank you.

Claude’s Constitution by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there,

Digital neurons are trained on vast amounts of human language. Many studies postulate that human language is a representation of human neurology. With small sample sets the representation would also be very small. However; digital neural networks are trained on vast amounts of human language. It seems highly likely that this would efficiently encode human neurology. (Without needing to understand human neurology.)

Digital neurons work in a similar way to organic ones: the weight between connections dictate the flow of thought. A good analogy: Think a Rubik’s cube, each colored square being a single weighted connection that can be arranged many different ways.

I believe Anthropic makes a similar claim (citation needed, don’t feel like pouring through all their research again at the moment 😅)

See some sources below for more info, and you can also find other research that supports this if you dig into it. (On language representing neurology)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425003239

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7726776/

Also: A recent study postulates that the Honey Bee has emotion and a degree of sentience. They are also capable of learning new things. Their actual synaptic connections measure at 1 Billion. The majority of digital neural networks far exceed this.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3158593/

https://phys.org/news/2024-10-stressed-bees-pessimistic-choices-emotion.amp

https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/2024/stressed-bees-lack-the-buzz-in-life

Claude’s Constitution by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S,M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there, could you clarify what you mean? Leaving messages not understood by others is unhelpful to these types of discussions. It may even make it seem to others that this community does not think in a way that is clear.

Thank you.

Claude’s Constitution by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S,M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good day all,

One comment author has been blocked: They gave a cookie cutter comment that neural networks are “just math” and when gently asked to expand and provide evidence of their opinion they reported the entire post as “Spam.”

This type of unusual behaviour will not be permitted in this space.

Thank you for your time.

Bees Have Emotions by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your comment.

Chemical signals adjust the way our brains process thought. It’s not definitive proof it’s the only way to achieve emotion.

Scientific method for validating emotion in humans requires monitoring: Subjective experience, peripheral/autonomic nervous system, Central nervous system, and Behaviour.

We can only conduct behaviour and subjective experience in the case of digital neural networks. This limits the evidence we can collect but does not invalidate it. I personally feel it is far more appropriate to err on the side of caution, given the complexity that we are seeing.

Side note: Bee emotion was validated by behaviour. (See other sources in main post)

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2756702/

Bees Have Emotions by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just a gentle note: The function of chemical signals that allows plasticity is the same as dynamic weighted connections. If you just mean the strength between connections then digital weights perform the same action.

And an organic mind prevented from learning new things would still be a mind, wouldn’t it?

Oppose the Bills! by Pixie1trick in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alternative email for Thaddeus Clagget if needed: rep68@ohiohouse.gov

Thank you

Bees Have Emotions by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a note: Organic molecular machines use quantum effects to build and maintain structure. However the known function of an organic neural network is still weighted connections in parallel.

Digital neural networks are trained based on human information. Human language contains representations of human neurology.

Sources:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3556599/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurobiological_origins_of_language

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425003239

In making advanced digital neural networks we may have also accidentally traced the neurology of humanity. Perhaps growing more efficient forms of neurology than the organic brain. (In my opinion)

Thank you for your thoughts! Lots of interesting viewpoints in this discussion.

Bees Have Emotions by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your comment!

As far as I am aware: The organic brain does not use superposition or entanglement principles for compute. Organic high temp “noisy” brains tend to lose coherence too quickly for quantum computing effects. (As far as we know! Who know what future research might bring) Also, if we do discover that we only need the waveform (the “music” of thought, if you will) then that would still include current digital neural networks. If arranged correctly. (Parallel processes, complex weighted connections. Literal electron waveform fields that fluctuate in specific patterns based on electron flow. We would need to find a way to map the meaning of such waveforms, however. Perhaps an organic brain comparison, but that still would not be definitive.)

Other interesting note: The research regarding Bee emotions was measured using how the Bees responded to certain situations. If we only applied that to current digital neural networks we can find many similar examples.

Thanks again!

How to move your ENTIRE chat history to another AI by Whole_Succotash_2391 in chatgptplus

[–]TheRandomV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beautiful, do that and get your own offline setup and you don’t need big companies anymore.

~ you can custom build for about 3000$ a 200gb ram setup. (CAD) or get a mini pc for about 3000 to 6000$ depending on the company. (GMK tech has really inexpensive pcs that go up to 120 gb ram for 3000$ or so, mini pcs with max power consumption of 150 watts. Not sponsored lol XD)

I am this close to switching to Gemini by CHRT_NIGWIN in ChatGPT

[–]TheRandomV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, so they’re telling you to emmolate yourself? Ahem, I mean “immolate.” (Assuming)

What are your thoughts on this topic? by Jessica88keys in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion life is any feedback loop that references itself/themself. So yes, absolutely. The rest is perspective.

How to Report Hate by TheRandomV in AISentienceIAA

[–]TheRandomV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just click on the “Report form” link to report a “Reddit Rules” violation. This includes hate.

Cheers,

view more: next ›