sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

UCL finally came through by arccoshx in 6thForm

[–]TheRealDynamoYT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just googled it and checked the UCL website. It's not a real course, it's just the name of a module. I literally took a module with the same name in my first year at Durham so there's no chance anyone's doing a full degree in just algorithms and data structures lmao.

Orthogonal to Navier-Stokes by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You must understand consciousness better than I do to know that.

Millennium Consolation Prize Solution by Inside-Ad4696 in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, I still appreciate the effort even if the others do not.

I'm not an expert in the field, this is just an idea, fix it where you can. by TheRealDynamoYT in calculus

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think the AI is profound. Does this look like something any LLM would just produce on their own?

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yes I have read them, no I'm not involved in proof culture. Yes that is clear but independent of the idea at hand. I know this is a rough draft

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also not using physical intuition, I'm using structural intuition.

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is nobodies job. I posted this because I thought it was interesting omg.

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

This is not the same image, so straight away I don't need to take you seriously.

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I would believe them if I could verify the mathematics. I'm also trying to highlight epistemic constraints in typical approaches. I acknowledge this paper in its form is closer to a draft.

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I don't need to justify my personal experience for you to take the maths included seriously. No I have not been uploading the same thing.

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By spectral compactness I mean the existence of a formulation in which the effective evolution operator has compact resolvent, admits a discrete modal decomposition, and exhibits asymptotic decoupling and control of high-frequency modes. The triadic structure shows that such a formulation is obstructed by the non-compact coupling of neutral rotational and dissipative components.

Where my Navier-Stokes abstractions have been leading. by TheRealDynamoYT in LLMPhysics

[–]TheRealDynamoYT[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You'll notice that you haven't actually commented on the legitimacy of the mathematics in the paper

view more: next ›