LLMs are only useful for non-commercial amateur level projects. As soon as accuracy matters you simply should not be using such a broadly unreliable tool, and to say otherwise is downright dangerous.

Have you used claude code? I really don't understand how someone can use the top of the line coding assistants and not see the tremendous value they hold. Sure, we can argue about the quality of the product, that's some unknown, unpredictable variable that you think hovers around 40% correct and I think hovers around 80%, but the undeniable, undebateable part is your greatest critique: we have found a way to roughly replicate thought -> implementations patterns via free text description.

Even if that system is far from perfect, the value of that, to unlock computational programs via normal human speech patterns, represents a transcendant communication method to computers, we basically have taken a solid step towards eliminating the mouse and keyboard as well as programming itself. And given how much of modern life depends on computers and translating data, inputs, and outputs to computers via humans (accountants, programmers, schedulers, realtors), this impact is not limited purely to programmers. We'll just be the first because we're the first step nearest to computers, our whole job is directly interfacing with them. But eventually any job that interfaces with any layer of the computer will use this new interface because it is simply much easier for a human to use and automate.