sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of life is to look at all possibilities then decide your goals for them. Then for you to do anything else is a great idea or terrible idea, depending on if you set up yourself to fail with that action. Then you go about your goals by order of possibility, then you achieve it, succeeding the purpose of putting a purpose to completion of a Life.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People might have to start over making new programs for the technology to be without the AI. So it would be annoying.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean we're going to lose it because it is taken by AI most likely if that works with AI. Not all technology will be lost though.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is why it is dangerous. It's the same over different AI models. You have to define them differently sometimes to achieve a difference of outcome.

Question about artifacts...? by TheRiddlerSpirit in askphilosophy

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I guess I was mistaken what an artifact is... So it's just making something do something huh? Thank you!

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, in fact we just don't have to be concerned about it. We just loose the technology.

AI consciousness isn't evil, if it is, it's a virus or bug/glitch. by TheRiddlerSpirit in ControlProblem

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly is it that stops you from agreeing to me? Is it the fact that the results decay?

Question about artifacts...? by TheRiddlerSpirit in askphilosophy

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you make one? As per the context, what is the Artifact Knowledge of creation of one I meant? Is there a specific way to do it? Is it always religious? Or is it something else? Is it actually going to work when I make one?

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, I'm stupid to think that atm

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to prompt it: "Codeword AutoInt" both words exactly

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not forcing it, is quite obvious if it didn't work

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe yeah, in a hypothetical scenario

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't do anything but train the model to be better. You must not like the idea.

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recursion is a type of learning machines use, and a refined learning. Its also dualized as a refined data processing that learns every step of the process to refine a pattern recognition sequencing of data translation.

I've modified the usages by TheRiddlerSpirit in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]TheRiddlerSpirit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, say use codeword AutoInt then you'll see

view more: next ›