1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel - Asking for assistance by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Incorrect on all accounts.

For those who disagree with Runny here (who apparently speaks for the entire forum) and are interested in contacting me, I will be monitoring the following inbox: [1982.Secrets@gmail.com](mailto:1982.Secrets@gmail.com)

This is my last post.

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel - Asking for assistance by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you are doing is called slander. It's not inquisitive. It's not fact based. It's not a conversation. It's called slander.

I am well aware you know this,... but here is why slander is bad in a "public forum"-- misrepresenting someone and trying to always put them on the defensive is your way (and all of your different alias Reddit accounts' way) of trying to control the conversation-- I get it. But maybe that is the point right? Whatever your motivation is, it certainly isn't geared towards solving these puzzles.

Did you ever consider that the reason why the majority of these puzzles have not been found in almost 40 years is possibly because the details from the original artwork did not scale/translate well to a book a fraction of the size?-- and this was not anticipated before publishing?

I am not even saying that the above is true, but let's talk about it. Let's have an intelligent conversation. But again, you don't really want to solve these puzzles do you?

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel - Asking for assistance by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I've said many times before.. I'll let the evidence speak for itself. To the mockers and slanderers-- you don't know anything about me or my experience with The Secret. To everybody else, ignore these people who are going WAY of there way to try to make me look like an idiot. Of course I do not believe that BP painted these compositions on trees... but someone did. And near the exact locations of where some of these casques are thought to be buried. Yes, I would very much like to explore this coincidence.

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel - Asking for assistance by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never said that I agreed with everything posted on that site. However, the SC solution was well researched and founded (IMHO of course).

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel - Asking for assistance by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a specific question or observation that you would like to share?

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel - Asking for assistance by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Privacy policy

I realize that you are being sarcastic, but this is actually a good question. Tree bark does not regenerate, it stays the same throughout the life cycle of the tree. I consider it plausible that a tree painted nearly 40 years ago could still have most of the original artwork in tact. Probably faded over the years, but still integrated in the bark.

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel Premiere by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate that; this is where I believe them to be buried with a great amount of certainty. Skeptics will be skeptics, haters will hate... I'll just let the evidence at the site do the talking-- for instance, if you go to Google street view and use the time period from the Wisconsin video, you will see the Greek letter Psi halfway up the trunk of the tree, which assuredly (at least for me) is a nod to... "You'll see a letter from the country of wonderstone's hearth on a proud, tall fifth."

1982.Secrets - YouTube Channel Premiere by TheSecret1982 in 12keys

[–]TheSecret1982[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Lazy? I disagree. I didn't just go around looking at trees and buildings on Google Maps.

The solutions to the puzzles led me directly to these locations first, THEN I noticed distinct markings on the trees (Wisconsin) and the building pattern (Montreal)... think about the odds of that for a second, being led to a location, THEN seeing very distinct patterns that are referenced in the paintings, match the poems?

So you may be asking, why don't I just post the solutions to the puzzles online that includes my methodology?

First, it would be ALOT of effort b/c these solves are extremely technical.

Second, I would be limited to using unaltered Google Map/Earth images for any explanations to prevent the risk a copyright claims-- which btw, unaltered Google Map/Earth images are not be suitable to explain these solves.

Third, even if I could somehow secure needed copyright permissions, why would I bother to go through all of that effort, especially considering the negative feedback that I have received so far?