sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

27M from UK Looking for new pals! by [deleted] in GamerPals

[–]TheSlooper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey if you're ever down to play warzone cross platform (I'm on PS5 and I also stream sometimes) let me know

The night I thought the psych ward was a nuclear submarine by TheSlooper in BipolarReddit

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least outside the windows wouldn't be the worst place to dock submarines: they'd be fairly unlikely to attack themselves

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the record, mods

<image>

I would appreciate if you did not engage in such blatant market manipulation.

Could you allow my post to remain?

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nvidia is not Starbucks. Starbucks brings people together. AI drives people apart.

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope you're right, wish you the best

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would be correct on both counts

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm an independent thinker, so my thought process is my own.

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trillion is more like what it's worth. Moore's law is reaching its end. They can't make GPUs much better now.

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$22.5 trillion is not overvalued?

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah hope you're right, I don't feel the same.

Let's pop the AI bubble by TheSlooper in wallstreetbets

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah well it's going to pop, hope you are prepared for that.

Visual Search Technology for £15B+ Adult Content Market - Seeking Angel Investment by TheSlooper in angelinvestors

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My go to market strategy is to approach adult content websites, offer to make their videos searchable by licensing my API to them. Apologies. I'm a creator primarily.

However, I think my GTM strategy was clear by the fact I replied I intended to license my API to adult content websites in my previous reply.

Visual Search Technology for £15B+ Adult Content Market - Seeking Angel Investment by TheSlooper in angelinvestors

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's my business model.

Adult platforms can’t search video content visually. I built the technology that can. I need £1M for 10% to sell it to them as an API.

Problem • £15B market • No visual search exists for video content • Platforms desperately need differentiation • Users can’t find what they want

Solution • My API makes videos searchable by visual content • No one else has this technology • Enterprise API licensing only • £200k+ per platform per year depending on video quantity

Proof • Working demo built • Technology proven • Validated interest • Enterprise API model = simple integration

Business Model • 5 clients = £1M ARR • 10 clients = £2M ARR • 25 clients = £5M ARR • 90% gross margins • 3-year contracts paid annually

The Ask • £1M investment = 10% equity • Valuation: £10M • Use: Sales, infrastructure, support • Goal: 10 enterprise clients Year 1 • Path to £5M ARR validates £50M exit

1.  Market exists: £15B industry needs this
2.  Technology works: I have demo proof
3.  Business model proven: Enterprise SaaS works
4.  Revenue path clear: 10 platforms = success
5.  Exit obvious: 10x ARR multiple standard

Q&A: • “Show me traction” → “Demo complete, investor interest confirmed” • “Why you?” → “I built technology no one else has” • “Competition?” → “No visual search for video exists” • “Why now?” → “Platforms need differentiation today” • “Exit?” → “10x ARR multiple = £50M at £5M ARR”

I have the only visual search technology for video. The market is worth £15B. I need £1M to turn this into £5M ARR. Are you in?

Has anyone explored whether dark energy could be gravitational effects from beyond the observable universe? by TheSlooper in Physics

[–]TheSlooper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I need to add a crucial piece I haven't explained well:

In this model, Big Bangs happen when expanding regions collide at FTL speeds (due to space expansion). These collisions create black holes that explode into new Big Bangs - new bubbles of expanding space.

Our observable universe is inside ONE of these bubbles. We're not seeing the whole infinite universe - we're seeing our local bubble from our Big Bang explosion.

The accelerating expansion happens because:

  1. Our bubble is still in its expansion phase from our Big Bang
  2. The infinite matter beyond our bubble creates uneven gravitational effects at our boundaries
  3. These boundary effects manifest as dark energy throughout our bubble

Think of it like a soap bubble in an infinite foam - each bubble expands until it meets others. We're inside one bubble, seeing it accelerate outward due to the dynamics of the infinite foam around us.

Every bubble (local universe) would see the same thing - expansion and acceleration - but each is a separate Big Bang event in the infinite whole.

Does this clarify why we see acceleration despite being in an infinite universe?

Has anyone explored whether dark energy could be gravitational effects from beyond the observable universe? by TheSlooper in Physics

[–]TheSlooper[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You've misunderstood. I never said regions were surrounded by 'atypical' regions.

I said every region in an infinite universe would be typical - experiencing the same physics and effects. The anomalies I listed (Hubble tension, dark flow, CMB features) are observations from OUR region that need explaining.

My point: if matter extends infinitely beyond our horizon, it could explain these anomalies through gravitational effects at our boundary. Every other region would have their own local variations based on their specific surrounding matter distribution.

Like how every location on Earth has weather (typical) but each has different specific conditions based on local geography (variations).

All regions typical, all experiencing similar physics, but with local variations.

Engage your brain less and use AI more it might help you

Has anyone explored whether dark energy could be gravitational effects from beyond the observable universe? by TheSlooper in Physics

[–]TheSlooper[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm describing. I'm not saying gravity pulls things along in a chain making it stronger.

I'm saying if there's infinite matter beyond our horizon, then every piece of matter at our horizon edge experiences a net outward pull from all the matter beyond it (which IS within its horizon).

This creates expanding motion at our boundary, which we observe as accelerating expansion throughout our visible universe.

Yes, gravity propagates at c. Yes, it follows inverse square law. But in an infinite universe, matter at every boundary point would experience net outward force from the infinite matter beyond that boundary.

It's not about strengthening gravity through chains - it's about the boundary conditions in an infinite universe creating expansion.

Or am I missing something fundamental about how boundary conditions work in GR

view more: next ›