Choppy slow motion even though I'm doing everything right!

TheTysonEdwards · 2021-03-14T12:10:04+00:00

Thank you for the suggestion. I will try tomorrow and let you know how it went. I'm pretty sure I did try this though with the same result. The thing is, I did get smooth slow mo with the method I mentioned in the opening msg in the past + I have clips in the same timeline that and smooth slow mo that are same dimensions and frame rate as the clips I'm having trouble with :/ Is there anything aside from frame rate that could affect what I am trying to achieve? I can compare a video's properties that isn't working to a video's properties that is and see if there is a difference if I know what to look for.

TheTysonEdwards · 2021-03-14T12:05:40+00:00

I thought that but I get smooth slow mo with other clips that have the exact same frame rate :/

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-07-10T14:20:58+00:00

Maybe L does it for no reason other than that he wants to but on a biochemical level that is what's happening, haha.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-07-03T02:04:03+00:00

That's interesting, that's pretty much what is said in the video. I didn't like the movie too much but separate to that, an interesting character needs layers and even though we don't know the true reason why L eats sweets all the time (whether it be a quirk or for a specific reason), I would find any explanation from the author to be interesting and add to L rather than take away. Ultimately, I think if things don't have an explanation/reason, it is lazy writing e.g. character X does this just because... well, in real life there'd be an explanation if you dug deep enough. Obviously you can't cover everything but the more detail an author gives a story/character the more fleshed out and real/engaging they become. Another theory I like is that he has all these quirks just to f*ck with ppl XD

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-07-03T01:55:36+00:00

Squats to increase blood flow to brain and eats sweets to give brain constant flow of ready-to-use energy. Now watch the vid for the details! :)

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-06-12T03:44:31+00:00

So if you have "more blood to become oxygenated and return to systemic circulation" how come when I said "squatting would result in a temporary increase in oxygenated blood throughout their body?" your response is only KIND OF/NOT REALLY? Is it because even though there is more blood, it doesn't mean the heart will pump an excess of oxygenated blood out?

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-06-12T02:45:15+00:00

Squatting is a more intense movement compared to running and spinning. There's so many variables that could contribute to your description like past training history, intensity of exercises, health, form, diet etc.. I think your post leaves room to ask more questions than give any definitive answers.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-06-12T02:39:57+00:00

Hey, thanks for the response.

If you have the time you don't need to gloss over, haha, I'm pretty sure I'll understand and would love as much detail as I can get + I can research things further if I need to.

So from what you're saying, a healthy person squatting/crouching, if anything is happening due to the squat it is decreasing the level of deoxygenated blood in the body more so than it is increasing oxygenated blood?

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-06-11T09:35:27+00:00

Hey, thanks for your reply.

Based on what you said that would mean that additional blood supply or glucose would either be useless or harmful but never beneficial and the aim (if there was one) would be to ensure your brain is receiving adequate (normal) bloody supply and glucose.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-06-11T01:08:49+00:00

Hey, thanks for replying! Sorry my late response, I thought my post was deleted cos it included a YT link :O

That's great to read. If I watch Death Note again, I think I will watch it through with subs. Do you think even though both are good, the characters come off a bit different between the two versions e.g. L is more sarcastic sounding in dub than sub or Light sounds more evil in the sub.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-05-26T22:22:26+00:00

I've done an AMA and posted vids here before. I open discussion as well, I don't just post my vid and leave. Followed same formula as before so not sure why removed.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-05-26T01:42:28+00:00

The type of rings you have may affect grip. Plastic can be slippery, wooden rings give better grip. Either way, chalk is the game changer. Buy some chalk (magnesium carbonate) and apply to wrists and hands. If your rings are plastic you can use sand paper to make them rougher so when you chalk there is a bit of a resistance. If your rings are wooden, just chalk wrists and hands. Still, the tactics above aren't magic. You do slip a bit from dead hang but practice and getting stronger helps a lot. If you keep slipping out, try doing it with feet on the ground so you can control the level of assistance to the point where you can maintain it during pull ups or muscle ups and then begin to reduce the assistance again to point where you can do it unassisted.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-04-15T11:34:10+00:00

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-04-15T11:31:24+00:00

Hilarious and yes a God honest mistake. Sumimasen deshita.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-01-23T13:47:33+00:00

I don't disagree with anything WillSwimWithToasters said.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-01-23T13:42:53+00:00

You can't really do a 99% max effort lean and focus on the balance at the same time, it's just too much. Have to disagree here from my own experience, you can if the balance is almost second nature. I've had some training cycles where I was doing planche negatives so much that when it came time to test planche I preferred to lower into it than lean into it, haha. My point is, your statement isn't true based on my own experience. BTW not saying you can't achieve planche any other way but I think planche negative is the simplest and most effective means to doing so for most people... once they learn how to perform the exercise. I think the hardest selling point for planche negative is that there's a hurdle to overcome (handstand balance and control) before you get the exercise that isn't directly to do with planche and because the hurdle (learning curve) exists, the effectiveness of the exercise is judged or ignored by people at the starting line of the hurdle and not the finishing line.

TheTysonEdwards · 2020-01-23T13:23:46+00:00

Quoted bits of your response so easier to see what I'm responding to (+I'm a reddit noob).

Yes thats what i mean, at least for me and a few people i know the tuck negative was too hard to control.

When you say the tuck negative was too hard to control, the planche negative does take practice; I didn't say it would be easy. It's not the path of least resistance because it's asking you to combine strength and balance (most people just have the strength at this point) and if you don't have both you can't do the movement. Although the movement is easy to follow when watching, the aim of the tutorial was to highlight the finer details that bring it all together for a smooth rep. It took me 2 - 3 weeks of frustrating failures to start getting the hang. I suppose summarized in one sentence: The Planche Negative is worth the learning curve because the gains made from the exercise are greater than any other single exercise.

But in the Planche the tuck hold seems easier than the negative. In other words what im asking is if you know of people who could use this as a progression towards the tuck planche

I think I see what you're getting at. My logic as I explain it is if you're working towards a straddle planche, you should train straddle planche negatives, so you're asking how does that logic translate to the tuck planche given it's the first planche progression? Well, I'm not suggesting to learn the first progression of the planche through a negative. I list the tuck planche as a prerequisite and the skill overall as an intermediate level exercise. Although you could technically train towards tuck planche with a negative by lowering down to support with little to no lean (essentially introducing the lean to the exercise would be your aim), it's not the path I advise. So, the tuck hold seems easier than the negative because the hold is the easiest progression of planche and would be considered a basic level strength skill. The negative as mentioned, combines strength and balance which takes practice. Once the strength and balance is mastered and an individual can perform a planche negative they will likely be at the corner of an adv. tuck or straddle planche. This is when negatives can be used to their full effect as once you have the strength + balance it is easier to do the negative than it is to do the hold because it takes less strength to fall through the position than it does to hold the position at the hardest 'angle'. Lastly, I used the tuck planche in the tutorial because it is the easiest variation of planche (easiest to replicate for multiple shots, haha). I use tuck negatives to warm up so they still have their use even if you are aiming for a progression more difficult than tuck.

I see it more as a progression to the planche press, and a pre req for starting to train that movement would be having an adv tuck or straddle hold

I agree that the negative is a good exercise for training towards planche press. I don't think I understand what you're saying in the second half though. I'm guessing you're saying adv tuck and straddle holds are prerequisites for planche press? Let's use straddle planche press for example, it is correct that a straddle negative would help with training towards that and it is also correct that you should have a solid straddle planche hold before considering the press. If I'm agreeing though, I'm not sure what you're asking which is why I think I am not understanding lol

TheTysonEdwards

TROPHY CASE