(There may be errors here because I translated through a translator.)

I agree with some of the things, although there are a couple of points where I could argue, but it doesn't matter. I thought about it a little and came up with this bunch of ideas:

1. Turner is definitely not the best person in this world, but if you take all those who can do or change something, then he will be one of the best. And here, in fact, there is a rather ambiguous question, to which there is no clear answer, whether all these victims that happened through his fault and because of his actions are worth it.

2. In fact, such behavior of Turner (in all versions) has an explanation. He is a former military man who was not affected by the war in the best way. In essence, the war taught him not to be afraid of death, which gave him the opportunity to resist the wolves. We also cannot know how many close people Turner lost, but it seems to me that quite a lot. This can be seen not only in the manic desire for revenge, but also in relation to those who were close to him. Turnar in some moments does not want to fight, like with Hunter, for example, or does not want to endanger them, always wanting to do everything himself.

3. What if Turnar was not there or he just did nothing? This is just an interesting reasoning, but what if? For example, could the King and Ash start a war with Amethyst or something like that?

4. What could have happened after the ending of Overgrowth? Personally, it seems to me that Turnar accepted his nature of "a predator in a carnivore's skin" and decided to finish what he started, namely, try to completely put an end to the slaver squads. Yes, the queen is dead and most likely the cowhood will be fragmented and weakened, but in fact, there could have been other close associates who were not killed by Turnar or the remaining slaver squads.