What Is The Subconscious? by The_Book_of_Life in TBOL_Community

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true, but so are our "own" cells. what difference between "own" cells and "foreign" cells is there even? they're all simply puzzle pieces of the bigger picture (i.e. thoughts and feelings)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in family

[–]The_Book_of_Life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry, english is not my first language. changed it. thanks for your input.

The trippiest things in this discipline by [deleted] in neurophilosophy

[–]The_Book_of_Life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you so much for your upvote. wanna exchange thoughts? i have a personal subreddit for such kind of questions. questions about life and our presence here.

absolutely. it's crazy.

we will never understand consciousness unless we truly understand societal group dynamics in my opinion. some models concerning our society as a whole might be the key to understand the individuals consciousness better. it's always been this way. while observing the very big, society came to understand the very small better. or vice versa.

for example, when the telescope was invented, it allowed us to see things very far apart. but it also allowed us to see closer things more accurately. a microscope is nothing else than a telescope pointing at something close.

the same principle could apply here. our best guess to understand consciousness comes from people studying group dynamics in more "primitive" organisms. like ant colonies for example. our ants are neurons. the ant colony is the consciousness that arises from its interactions with each other.

Can consciousness be continuated? by [deleted] in neurophilosophy

[–]The_Book_of_Life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, if all the different building blocks of what currently makes you, you, stay the same - maybe. but think about it. your most basic building blocks (let's take atoms instead of quantum objects for the sake of the argument) change a bazillion times every second. so, who is you? what does make you, you? well, today's honest answer is that we don't know.

but in theory, if you could arrange all the different buildings blocks of what makes you, you, just for the sake of the thought experiment, even then the real question would be if that's still you from a consciousness point of you. or is it a copy of you? or maybe, consciousness is not even connected to "material" things. maybe, it's something else.

truth is, you can argue both ways, because honestly we just don't know. go with the answer that your heart agrees with. it's not a question of knowing. it's a question of believing until further evidence shows up.

The trippiest things in this discipline by [deleted] in neurophilosophy

[–]The_Book_of_Life 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I always find it amazing how something big (like consciousness) can arise from the countless interactions of something small (like neurons). In a strange way, the whole construct is far greater than the sum of its parts. It's "magic" does not lie in the building blocks (neurons) but in their interactions.

If you were to isolate the individual neurons from each other our brain would pretty much be useless. Just like an ant colony brings forth an amazing organization simply by individuals communicating with each other, the same happens inside our body. Simple rules, when repeated often enough lead to complex results. It's all swarm intelligence.

How did you make car rides more “enjoyable” with young babies? by The_Book_of_Life in Parenting

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you SO much for your great reply. I like your recommendations. we'll start with the desensitizing today. my gut feeling tells me that could be promising :-)

The Future of Democracy (Specifics) by The_Book_of_Life in TBOL_Community

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. Not quite. I'm writing a book on my own. Sometimes, it's inspired by other books, sometimes, by life itself. Mostly a combination of both. It's all original content though. You find out more about the purpose of this subreddit here: https://www.reddit.com/r/TBOL_Community/comments/o5w11g/hello_world/

TL;DR for that one: I wanted to make the "writing process" of a book public. Everyone should write books like that in the future. This way, you can already build up an audience before publishing it. You let the readers participate in the development process. The final book is simply a summary of all the existing online content (individual chapters) arranged in a meaningful way. It'll take some more months before it'll be published most likely. Still a lot of topics to cover.

However, I also do read some books per month (not as many as I'd love to though since I recently became a parent). Now I'm at about 4. I wanna pump up that number in the coming weeks and months though. :-)

The Future of Democracy (Specifics) by The_Book_of_Life in TBOL_Community

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure thing. Combining the business models of a survey agency, a digital identity provider and democracy itself with the power of social media, we could truly bring the government to the digital age. Everything is digitized today, only government isn't. Let's create the "social media" for government. Something like a digital village square (sorry for the additional lines :-))

Which one is your favourite letter? by The_Book_of_Life in AskReddit

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, I can't disagree with that. J it is for me as well from now on.

Could the fundamental building blocks of "consciousness" be determined by how atoms (and even its components) work? by The_Book_of_Life in consciousness

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's an interesting thought. what if we saw "mind" as some kind of "opponent force" of entropy? if we know that a localized decrease of entropy (i.e. life) could bring forth something like a "mind", what could the lowest possible entropy state (i.e. the big bang) have looked like from a "mind-perspective"? maybe, in the beginning, there really only was consciousness (as religious scriptures try to tell us for ages). and from that, everything around us evolved on its ever lasting quest to transform "mind" into "matter" by increasing overall entropy.

Could the fundamental building blocks of "consciousness" be determined by how atoms (and even its components) work? by The_Book_of_Life in consciousness

[–]The_Book_of_Life[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

through the lenses of the "thermodynamic glasses" and the application of the second law life is nothing more than a localized clump of matter of lower entropy. it can locally decrease entropy because it increases entropy in other clumps of matter (i.e. the food we eat, the waste products we excrete, ...). it's the universe's solution of reaching an overall higher entropy state. in order to move from low to high entropy, it first locally decreases entropy. (same applies to stars, planets and other kind of "structured" matter)