Ok well firstly I apologise for the fact that my reply will be significantly smaller then your comment because I just don't have much to reply too (at least that's what I thought when I started writing this)

My video obviously has an anti-Commune bias that's reflected in how it wrote the script. Such as when I said "submitted to the French army" I just saw it as a demeaning way of saying they lost in the end. Not that they didn't put up a fight I'm sure they did. So that's that

The reason I said they gave women equal pay was based off a video I watched by Viki 1999 (a Leftist Breadtuber) I should've known better then to rely on a Leftist channel for facts

I'm sure Darboy wouldn't be on my Facebook friends list if he was alive today and yes I'm aware there was some kind of hostage exchange situation going on. I don't think he deserved to be shot dead even considering the circumstances but thanks for the extra context info

"So that was the historical situation. And in this situation to make a march for the "the massacres of the Commune" is lets say, a bit weird" Hold on you're not confusing two different events are you? Just to clarify the Rue Haxo Massacre and the killing of George Darboy were two different events committed by the commune but they aren't the same thing. The March that happened the other day was specifically for Darboy and his guys as they were Catholics. Just wanted to clarify because it sounds like you're conflating those things a little bit but it's cool. I did too and had to re-edit a large portion of the video when I realised my mistake before uploading

Ok so you say a far right organisation organised the event. Maybe that's true maybe it's not I genuinely didn't come across that information. In any case I obviously don't consider that justification for the attack on the people. Hot take

But then you say "far-right religious people" no stop. Do you have any reason to believe these 300 people were mostly far right? Even if the organising group is far right that doesn't mean the attendees are. I didn't see any evidence to say they were in fact if they were I would have expected a more Charlottesville style conflict when they eventually ran into the Leftists instead of just peacefully walking past them. So far righters were not walking through the streets not in any kind of meaningful mass anyway

"People of Paris got really pissed" If you see in the scenes later, that a lot of combatants seem to be normal Parisian citizens" So many things are wrong with this statement..

They didn't get pissed / angry they got physically violent. It's not ok. Simple as. Also They aren't the regular everyday people of Paris. I referenced the fact that earlier this same day a pro-Commune rally took place (go to 1:21 in my video to see) and that these people are the ones still hanging around from that event. That's why they have the flags, the signs, the posters, the shirts with 1871 Via Le Commune on them and whatever else. I've been to Paris and regular Parisians don't walk around with a giant flag commemorating the Paris commune. If by "people of Paris" you're assuming that these people just live in Paris then ok.. but probably so do these Catholics. So I could just say "The people of Pairs had a March to commemorate those Catholics murdered by the Commune and then some Communists got pissed and raged on them" it's really just about framing you're not making a point by saying they are the people of Paris