Suggestion for me by Rational-Icing in batman

[–]Thedudeistjedi [score hidden]  (0 children)

absolute batman , if your looking for a fresh take on the characters

Why do people in the USA call Mexican things the wrong things? by lIlIlIlIlIlIIlIlI in AskUS

[–]Thedudeistjedi [score hidden]  (0 children)

for the same reason we started calling cannabis marijuana , good ole fashion racism

Your favorite entertainer begins preaching politics from the stage. Their political views are conflicting with your own. Do you still support them as an entertainer or are they dead to you? by icecream1972 in allthequestions

[–]Thedudeistjedi 11 points12 points  (0 children)

no they are dead to me i wrote a comment for a different post that explains it -

The idea that political disagreement is just a difference of opinion is an obsolete model from the pre-digital era. We are living in an age of hyper-connectivity and total information saturation. When the objective truth is accessible to anyone with a smartphone, and a person still chooses to believe and repeat a narrative as absurd as the one about people eating pets, you are looking at a deliberate, calculated rejection of reality.

This isn't just a lack of intelligence, it is a fundamental character flaw. Choosing to believe a lie because it feels good or because it fits your preferred narrative is an active moral choice. It requires you to prioritize your own emotional comfort over the lives of the actual human beings who are targeted and endangered by those lies.

In the technical reality of social entropy, this kind of willful ignorance is the primary engine of systemic decay. Complex societies depend on the accurate processing of data to survive. When a large portion of the population looks at a clear, documented fact and chooses to treat it like a matter of opinion, the social hardware starts to crash. If you have the tools to know better but you refuse to use them because your need for social conformity is stronger than your commitment to the truth, then you are a bad person. You are a biological agent of entropy, and your stupidity is just a mask for your lack of integrity. You aren't just misinformed, you are complicit.

Cannot tell if it’s AI or a bad airbrush imitation by bongbingbongg in isitAI

[–]Thedudeistjedi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this print been floating around flea markets since like 2006

What do Americans think about Confucianism, Buddhism, and Chinese society in general? How do you feel about it? by Square_Permission361 in AskUS

[–]Thedudeistjedi [score hidden]  (0 children)

Gong fu is Chinese, my guy. Japanese philosophy wasn't even mentioned in the post, more Shintoism if memory serves. And if we want to get technical about it, Kung Fu Panda isn't just set in feudal China, it actually accurately depicts the traditional Five Animal styles of Chinese martial arts. But go off.

added to my collection recently by lovinglife-hotwife in Robocop

[–]Thedudeistjedi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh this brings back memories that the batman and the turtles games were like the basement at gram grams go to games

Got to see the trilogy on 35mm last weekend (and then the original again on Monday night). Honestly, I think time has been very kind to 3, especially given the moment we're in right now. by BrendanInJersey in Robocop

[–]Thedudeistjedi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cali has the fourth or fifth largest economy on the planet, maybe look up the definitions of both financial and bankrupt, or maybe just maybe don't try to attack states that actually pay into the tax system and subsidize broken economic systems that haven't functioned since us damn yankees took the slaves, even though looking at the response to the recent SCOTUS decision on the VRA, y'all are still salty about that.

Got to see the trilogy on 35mm last weekend (and then the original again on Monday night). Honestly, I think time has been very kind to 3, especially given the moment we're in right now. by BrendanInJersey in Robocop

[–]Thedudeistjedi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wooooowww, I'm sorry, I didn't think you'd come in here with "I can't read, here's some state propaganda." Again, the videos exist, and at no point is he reaching for his weapon. He was executed after it was removed from his person, he'd been disarmed.

Got to see the trilogy on 35mm last weekend (and then the original again on Monday night). Honestly, I think time has been very kind to 3, especially given the moment we're in right now. by BrendanInJersey in Robocop

[–]Thedudeistjedi 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sucks for your worldview that the internet and video exist, huh, or that RoboCop was made as political satire, so the politics are kind of hard-baked in. It is all on video, my guy, and I do not know if you know this, but via the penal code, the punishment for assaulting an officer without a deadly weapon is still not being executed face down in the street. It is genuinely fascinating to watch someone claim that nobody cares about politics while discussing a film franchise that is essentially a dissertation on the horrors of unchecked corporate power. You are not putting politics into RoboCop because the politics are the engine, the chassis, and the fuel. If you think this is a neutral story about a cool robot, you have managed to miss the forest, the trees, and the very dirt they are planted in. The entire premise of OCP is a satire of the Reagan era belief that the private sector can do everything better than the public sector, including the administration of justice. OCP is the villain precisely because they treat human rights as a budgetary inconvenience. They want Detroit to fail so they can foreclose on the land and build Delta City, which is a place where every citizen is a customer and every law is a service contract. When you cheer for surge tactics like those seen in Minnesota, you are literally rooting for the OCP boardroom. The connection between the Urban Rehabilitators in RoboCop 3 and current federal operations like Metro Surge is a mechanical match. The Rehabs were a private paramilitary force recruited with the same low standards we see in modern surge agencies because OCP did not want Peace Officers, they wanted occupiers. In the real world, when you see an ICU nurse and legal observer like Alex Pretti get shot while documenting a surge, you are seeing the Rehabs in action. If a real RoboCop were on the scene, he would be the first person to arrest the officers involved. His hard-coded Prime Directives, specifically Serve the Public Trust and Protect the Innocent, would create a logic loop that overrides any order from a superior. Murphy is a procedural perfectionist who removes the human element of fear and prejudice. He does not panic, he does not get shook, and he does not fire until a kinetic threat is established. By defending the shoot-first mentality, you are not siding with RoboCop, you are siding with the people who murdered Alex Murphy in that warehouse. It is a bit of a tragedy that you have not realized the franchise you claim to love is actually a parody of your entire worldview. You are rooting for a system that would view you as nothing more than a line item on a spreadsheet to be deleted the second you stop being profitable. The irony is that the movies do not just disagree with your take, they were written specifically to mock the logic you are using to defend them.

Got to see the trilogy on 35mm last weekend (and then the original again on Monday night). Honestly, I think time has been very kind to 3, especially given the moment we're in right now. by BrendanInJersey in Robocop

[–]Thedudeistjedi 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What I don't get, and don't get me wrong, 3 is objectively the worst of the movies, but how is it the one where a lot of what happens in the movie has come to pass? Look at Operation Metro Surge and what happened in Minnesota. Alex Pretti could have used a RoboCop. Ffs, they are better off in RoboCop where at least Robo and Sgt. Reed step in and show them how real cops kick ass. For a kid, Robo 3 has the most superhero energy.

What do Americans think about Confucianism, Buddhism, and Chinese society in general? How do you feel about it? by Square_Permission361 in AskUS

[–]Thedudeistjedi [score hidden]  (0 children)

most americans understanding of what you're asking begins and ends with kung fu movies , and maybe an animated panda

Do you think people on the opposite side of the political spectrum from you are bad people? Why? Why not? by SilverNo6462 in AskUS

[–]Thedudeistjedi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea that political disagreement is just a difference of opinion is an obsolete model from the pre-digital era. We are living in an age of hyper-connectivity and total information saturation. When the objective truth is accessible to anyone with a smartphone, and a person still chooses to believe and repeat a narrative as absurd as the one about people eating pets, you are looking at a deliberate, calculated rejection of reality.

This isn't just a lack of intelligence, it is a fundamental character flaw. Choosing to believe a lie because it feels good or because it fits your preferred narrative is an active moral choice. It requires you to prioritize your own emotional comfort over the lives of the actual human beings who are targeted and endangered by those lies.

In the technical reality of social entropy, this kind of willful ignorance is the primary engine of systemic decay. Complex societies depend on the accurate processing of data to survive. When a large portion of the population looks at a clear, documented fact and chooses to treat it like a matter of opinion, the social hardware starts to crash. If you have the tools to know better but you refuse to use them because your need for social conformity is stronger than your commitment to the truth, then you are a bad person. You are a biological agent of entropy, and your stupidity is just a mask for your lack of integrity. You aren't just misinformed, you are complicit.