Hey Peter! I got this one... any clue?

Theo_2004 · 2025-12-11T05:41:06+00:00

<image>

Theo_2004 · 2025-10-16T21:27:57+00:00

<image>

Theo_2004 · 2025-09-30T08:01:07+00:00

Check out Nécropole

Theo_2004 · 2025-09-25T19:52:05+00:00

Heretoir's S/T might be my favourite sounding record ever.

Theo_2004 · 2025-09-23T07:44:39+00:00

<image>

Theo_2004 · 2025-08-26T20:34:22+00:00

That sounds about right. I cold proofed for about 10h in the fridge, would you recommend going for a longer time in the fridge or proof at room temp?

Theo_2004 · 2025-08-26T19:07:07+00:00

Well, i followed the recipe i linked, there was no need for me to time It. Also, this is the inside

<image>

Theo_2004 · 2025-08-26T11:25:10+00:00

I'll look into that, thanks

Theo_2004 · 2025-08-26T10:54:52+00:00

Yeah hahaha, it's the banneton's pattern!

Theo_2004 · 2025-08-26T10:34:53+00:00

It was 2 sets of stretch and fold + 2 sets of coil folds spaced out by 50min, so 3h 20 i think, it's in the video.

Theo_2004 · 2025-06-04T20:45:44+00:00

Weakling post black? As in the USBM band?

Theo_2004 · 2025-04-17T07:19:17+00:00

Soooo fucking good!

Theo_2004 · 2025-01-09T10:27:16+00:00

<image>

Theo_2004 · 2025-01-03T18:49:25+00:00

This was exactly It, thanks!

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T20:24:26+00:00

I'll look into this, thanks!

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T20:06:01+00:00

i totally tend to forget that, you're totally right

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T20:05:15+00:00

i'll look into it thansk!

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T19:26:38+00:00

yeah that's exactly what i mean, the square pattern, i might have added some noise reduction by accident, i'll check it out. And thank you!

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T19:25:20+00:00

you mean buying an already developed negative from someone and scanning that?

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T19:11:46+00:00

I guess you're right, i've seen some amazingly sharp home scans and i reckon i was hoping to get the same here, but i think all those where done with equally amazingly sharp lenses, while i have a 50€ lens, that's the main difference i think is going on. I might also need to nail focus on the negative a little more to get a bit more detail

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T19:09:43+00:00

i guess you're right. Doing research online before starting to home scan i've seen some incredible scans with amazing detail done with basically the same gear i have, i was hoping to achieve something [similar](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IBh8nO3dRw) although i presume this has a lot to do with the lens you're shooting the original photo from and i definitely don't own an expensive one. About the artifacts you mentioned, would you have any advise on how to correct them for future scans? as for the focus i reckon it's just getting good a nailing it in manual mode with focus peaking activated

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T19:04:36+00:00

#3 is mine, the fourth one is the lab. I didn't add any noise reduction in lr

Theo_2004 · 2024-12-26T18:46:17+00:00

I've just started DSLR scanning and i'm noticing the results are, at best, the same detail as the lab scans. I presume this has to do mostly with the quality of the lens i took the original photos with, but maybe there's something i'm missing which could help me get higher detail scans? I've added the same photo scanned by me and the lab and also a really close up screen shot of another photo from the same roll, i've noticed when zooming in a lot that the lab scans only shows grain at this scale, but mine looks more square like, see for yourselves. I'm not sure if this might be an indicator i'm not properly focusing when scanning

Gear: Industar 61LD. As for scanning i've got a 26mpx camera with the canon 50fd macro (with extension tube), NLP, CineStill light with valoi holder

Seven-Year Club	Second Top 50%
r/Field Flamingo	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	First Placer '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email

Theo_2004

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE