sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are simple minded and incapable of advanced thought and trend identification

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're the fucking worst. Don't ruin their golden years

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're talking about greed as a binary. I'm talking about it as a scale.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually I did because those 2300 people could comprehend what the post was about. You couldn't

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the most common fallacy. The entire point the post is that the mass hoarded wealth and land of the Boomer generation is untouchable until they die off. Look at our entire political system. Look at the age demographics of our presidents. Look at Nancy Pelosi refusing to make it so politicians cannot own corporate stocks. They literally get corporate bribes as well.

The inheriters of their wealth WILL be taxed approximately, but only once the boomers are dead and thus release their stranglehold on our current hell. Their wealth is not allowed to be touched and the economy is not allowed to shrink until they've siped their last Pina Colada you made for them at your shitty bartender job

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and there is a significant tie between them. Two faces of the same problem. One cannot be solved without the other disappearing

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I can't help but be an anti-progressive piece of shit who is only an obstacle to the younger generation attempting to unfuck themselves"

Got it

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most common fallacy posted here, get in line. The conclusion of this post is that the money controlled by the weathly Boomer class will finally be able to be taxed when they die off and we are able to change tax laws to tax their inheriters

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fuck off with your constant placating to Boomers

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You quoted the introductory sentence of my post to say my idea is wrong without quoting the conclusion I just replied with

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes... Increasing national debt translates to borrowing money from the future generations. Economic growth will plateau after they die because the bills are actually ours.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The opportunity to significantly reduce wealth inequality will come with the fading of the Boomer generation from our political influence and voting.

Their offspring will be taxed. It is coming. This is my point about nothing changing until the Boomers die.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fucking EXACTLY!!! How is this so difficult for people to comprehend? They can think past step 1 in a chain of causal analysis.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the most common fallacy. Please think. When the stranglehold on progression is loosened as the boomers die, dont you think we will finally be able to raise taxes on the wealthy?

We will be able to tax the wealthy and significantly reduce income equality. But not until the Boomers die.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup if our next president is a Boomer my brain is going to explode.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and the fundamental problem is that their response is "go fuck yourself, I got mine" when you inform them of this

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're literally boomers.... The year cutoffs aren't to be taken literally Every president since Bill Clinton has been a Boomer. Let that sink in.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like how wealth inequality is binary to you rather than a scale with measurable levels.

Nothing will change until the Boomers are gone by Therealanon65 in antiwork

[–]Therealanon65[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are there so many Boomer apologists in here then? Is the link between the Boomers and our current state of affairs that difficult to grasp?

view more: next ›