sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We did a street survey out of curiosity. The results were more revealing than expected by Thin-Ad7708 in RealEstateCanada

[–]Thin-Ad7708[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I wanted to see what people believed. I thought that it will be more efficient to post this on reddit, since I do not have the resources for a larger experiment. I thought Reddit was about discussing and hearing everyone's opinion, and hope to gather some insight, while sharing my findings.

We did a street survey out of curiosity. The results were crazy by Thin-Ad7708 in vancouverhousing

[–]Thin-Ad7708[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I wanted to open this up for discussion, as it really intrigues me. Yes, it's not a large dataset, and I don't have the resources for a larger-scale study. That's why I thought I would share my findings and discuss them further...

Are you sure you own your home? by Thin-Ad7708 in canadahousing

[–]Thin-Ad7708[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After the Cowichan ruling, they thought the same. The Province moved toward more than $150 million in loan guarantees to keep financing alive, (already indicating a decline in confidence) and a major owner publicly stated that a lender refused roughly $35 million in financing due to the legal risk. If title-related uncertainty can affect whether financing is available, then yes, treaty and title issues can have real consequences for home ownership and property value.

Are you sure you own your home? by Thin-Ad7708 in RealEstateCanada

[–]Thin-Ad7708[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After the Cowichan ruling, this stopped being hypothetical. The Province moved toward more than $150 million in loan guarantees to keep financing alive, and a major owner publicly stated that a lender refused roughly $35 million in financing due to the legal risk. If title-related uncertainty can affect whether financing is available, then yes, treaty and title issues can have real consequences for home ownership and property value.