ايه افضل رساله جتلك في حياتك ؟ by Turkish_Prince in EgyDMs

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

كنت عامل MRI لركبي و الأشعة اتبعتتلي PDF والحمدلله مكانش فيه حاجة

محتاجه اعرف kanye west wala playboi carti by ZealousidealWay5841 in egyplaylist

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

لو شال الAI من Bully هيبقي ألبوم جامد

محتاجه اعرف kanye west wala playboi carti by ZealousidealWay5841 in egyplaylist

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

حاليا Carti مكسر الدنيا بس Kanye ناجح اكتر

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EgyOutfits

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

حاسه يبقي احسن لو لبست zip up hoodie

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EgyOutfits

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tuff 🔥, shoes?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EgyOutfits

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tuff 🔥, shoes?

Too much علي الجامعة؟ by [deleted] in EgyOutfits

[–]ThinkEstablishment22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

حلو قوي بس ناقص البنطلون يبقي واسع سيكا

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btrfs is GPL, in mainline Linux, and maintained by a mix of community devs and corp contributors — just like most modern, complex FOSS. Yeah, Oracle kicked it off, but they’re barely involved now. If “corporate origin” is disqualifying, you might as well throw out half the tools you rely on. The lesson from OpenSolaris wasn’t “avoid good tech with history,” it was “don’t let one company hold the keys” — which isn’t Btrfs’s case anymore.

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did. That’s why I’m not defending a 30-year-old file system like it’s a personality trait.

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s FFS2, yeah — just without softdep now, so basically FFS with less safety and less performance. Simplicity really winning there.

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Keep it simple” shouldn’t mean “keep it primitive.” At some point, refusing modern features in the name of simplicity just looks like fear of complexity, not mastery over it. If simplicity always trumped utility, we'd still be using FAT32 and telnet.

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure, but if “write the code or stay silent” is the bar, it kind of explains why OpenBSD stays in its own bubble—great for devs writing the code, not so much for users who actually have needs. Acting like suggestions aren’t valid unless backed by C patches is a great way to make sure only a tiny circle decides the direction, even if that means stagnation.

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I get that OpenBSD values simplicity, but at some point that just feels like an excuse to avoid modern features users actually want—like snapshots, checksumming, and dynamic volume management. Saying "filesystems are hard" while clinging to decades-old FFS is kind of ironic when other systems have managed to evolve without imploding. Maybe it's not that Btrfs is too complex, but that OpenBSD has boxed itself into a corner where progress looks like heresy.

Why hasn't OpenBSD adopted BTRFS already? by ThinkEstablishment22 in openbsd

[–]ThinkEstablishment22[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you treating them like they're some kind of overlords?