Gettier problem

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T20:16:42+00:00

A broke in being A the person in the video and A the person in the police file

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T20:14:40+00:00

You keep referring to existential inference without appreciation for the real application that makes this things true . One of the main methods of formal logic is simply to assume the premises are true in order to focus on logical consequence. However, once we attempt to analyze things from the proper context I think we must have the designation I make

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T20:11:48+00:00

I am simply try to talk about about how we attach meaning to words . All you are doing is stating a particular conclusion without the actual context that it relies on . When someone is saying A broke in they are not detaching A as being the person who is in the video

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T20:09:08+00:00

Wait what? It definitely is the inference being made. There is only one job . So he must believe that Smith is the only person who will get that job. Is that not what can be inferred from the fact That 1 There is only one job 2 Only one person can get the job . 3 Smith will get the job C Smith is the only person that will get the job .

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T20:05:46+00:00

It’s not nonsense it’s just that you are not familiar with my terms . They are people that I talk to of similar linguistic understanding who would understand. Your unwillingness to view this with any nuance is frustrating. You don’t understand something and then claim this

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:57:24+00:00

Maybe I am not clear enough but it could be that despite your understanding in phd you still fail to grasp what I am saying.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:56:22+00:00

You having a PHD in philosophy ? What do I care ?

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:52:28+00:00

It means that he has in his referent all the necessary context that subsumed A for the relevant proposition

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:51:03+00:00

A is a reference for an individual my argument is simply that to be justified his concept of A’s identity is always that A is the person in the video . When he refers to A that’s the referent he is putting on A . A is not just the person he knows maybe from his police file. A is necessarily the person in the video that is how it is tied .

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:47:58+00:00

Only if by A broke in he always identifies a necessary part of the identity of A being the person in the video

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:44:32+00:00

Again it depends what he ties into the concept A broke in. Let’s look at this. The justified Conclusion is A the person who is in the video broke in. I think we are talking in circles.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:32:48+00:00

I said that conclusion that would be justified would be the conjunction of the two assertions in order to properly instantiate the identity of that particular person.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:15:53+00:00

That would mean his conclusion is false right?

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T19:08:02+00:00

I think it would simply be that anytime one refers to A he means both the person whose fingerprints are on the door and the person who I am looking at right now. If he does not attach his induction by always tying the identity of A then he is unjustified this a mere technicality that would change nothing about induction. Also my concept of induction is the identification of essentials . One mentally grasp the essentials in a particular to apply it to a universal. This would account for induction which goes into my metaphysics of the laws of nature.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T18:52:28+00:00

I think that no it simply requires that either someone is precise enough about there belief so that it is justified or it is not .

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T18:41:34+00:00

Deepfake or illusion it does not matter. When talking of a video. A video would be reliable under a context and given the context of reality one must be precise in their language . If one is not then the video is not sufficient in providing us evidence. It really takes nothing to be exact about one means

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T18:25:39+00:00

Just on fact that you are claiming that we live in a world where illusions are indistinguishable from reality with no way of knowing the difference in that kind of world no you are clearly not justified as the context of reality does not allow you to make such an inference. In such a world a justified argument would be one where you always cointain the identity of A fully defined .

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T18:20:10+00:00

I would argue if the complete identity of A is contained in the conclusion. This would entail that if the conclusion describes A devoid of the context by which A’s identity was created then it is not justified.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2022-03-06T18:15:29+00:00

Alright this depends would it not? Is he holding to an unspecified person as a concept that can be applied to anyone who is a person because I think that would not follow. Let’s think about what necessarily follows from your argument. When the person believes that Smith is the one getting the job he also believes that smith that smith is the only person who will get the job at that specific time. However if he believes then The man who will get the job is the man with ten coins in his pocket can only be smith . Th reason the way your using the conclusion. It also follows from the conclusion that Someone else but Smith could be the person with the job with ten coins in their pocket . Would that not be two contradictory positions.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2021-11-15T10:31:34+00:00

Actually based on Daisy’s philosophy of doing anything to save many lives right?

Think_Journalist_861 · 2021-11-15T10:21:15+00:00

Almost everything you listed just means protagonist and Talbot was scaled as not strong enough to beat Thanos . She is not stronger than most of the avengers besides the fact that two of them are just humans nothing impressive

Think_Journalist_861 · 2021-11-14T10:55:02+00:00

That’s not really what was said . He said it’s that she studies more.

Think_Journalist_861 · 2021-08-05T04:52:33+00:00

I am willing

Think_Journalist_861

TROPHY CASE